Aphasia, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
aphasia, language, rehabilitation, speech-language pathology
Brief summary
Every year approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke, and up to 40% of those Veterans will experience stroke-related language impairment (i.e., aphasia). Stroke-induced aphasia results in increased healthcare costs and decreased quality of life. As the population of Veterans continues to age, there will be an increasing number for Veterans living with the aphasia and its consequences. Those Veterans deserve to receive aphasia treatment designed to facilitate the best possible outcomes. In the proposed study, the investigators will investigate optimal treatment intensity and predictors of treatment response for a novel word retrieval treatment. The knowledge the investigators gain will have direct implications for the selecting the right treatment approach for the right Veteran.
Detailed description
Difficulty retrieving words is one of the most common language complaints in individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. The negative consequences related to word retrieval impairment include increased health care costs and decreased quality of life. A variety of treatment approaches exist to improve word retrieval, and most of the treatments result in immediate improvement on trained words. However, long-term improvement and improvement on untrained words or behaviors is less common. Additionally, the investigators currently know very little about optimal treatment administration parameters, and the investigators know even less about predictors of treatment response. To make the best use of the limited clinical resources available for aphasia treatment, and to maximize outcomes for Veterans with aphasia, the investigators must: 1) develop clinically translatable treatments that yield widespread and lasting effects and 2) develop clinically accessible ways of identifying who will acquire benefit from a specific treatment approach. This study takes on these two challenges by investigating dose frequency (massed vs. distributed practice) effects and by identifying the language, cognitive and neural predictors of response to Intention treatment (INT), a novel word retrieval treatment. Specifically, the investigators will address the following aims: Aim 1: To investigate dose frequency effects on maintenance and generalization of INT gains. Outcome measure: Word retrieval accuracy for trained and untrained words. Aim 2: To identify the language and cognitive variables that predict response to m-INT vs. d-INT. Outcome measure: Language and cognitive ability as measured by standardized assessments. Aim 3: To identify the neural predictors of response to m-INT vs. d-INT. Outcome measure: Tissue health and task activation location as measured by structural and functional MRI.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALIntention Treatment for Anomia
Word retrieval treatment for aphasia that engages right hemisphere intention mechanisms using a left-hand circular gesture.
Sponsors
VA Office of Research and Development
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Assessments will be conducted by study staff blind to treatment condition
Intervention model description
Delayed-start controlled trial with stratification across two groups (massed-INT, distributed-INT) based on severity of word retrieval deficits.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* English as primary language * \> 6 months post-onset a left-hemisphere stroke. Multiple strokes are acceptable as long as they are confined to the left hemisphere. * Diagnosis of aphasia * Presence of word retrieval deficits * Adequate comprehension as judged by ability to complete two-step commands on the Western Aphasia Battery.
Exclusion criteria
* Severe apraxia of speech or dysarthria * Clinically significant depression * For MRI safety: implanted medical devices, metal in the body and claustrophobia.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional MRI scan | Baseline | Task-based activation location (from functional MRI scans) will be obtained at baseline to investigate neural predictors of treatment outcome. |
| Number of correctly named pictures | Through study completion, an average of 6 months; Change from baseline to 3 weeks (post massed-INT) or 12 weeks (post distributed-INT), change at 3 months post-treatment, change at 6 months post-treatment | Change in the ability to correctly name 10 trained and 10 untrained pictures will be measured at 4 time points |
| Number of correctly generated category members | Through study study completion, an average of 6 months; Change from baseline to 3 weeks (post m-INT) or 12 weeks (post d-INT), change at 3 months post-treatment, change at 6 months post-treatment | Change in the ability to correctly name 5 trained and 5 untrained category members will be measured at 4 time points |
| Western Aphasia Battery | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate language predictors of treatment outcome |
| Boston Naming Test | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate language predictors of treatment outcome |
| Test of Everyday Attention | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome. |
| Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome. |
| Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome. |
| Digit Span Backwards | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome. |
| Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Sorting | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome. |
| Structural MRI scan | Baseline | Tissue health (from structural scan) will be obtained at baseline to investigate neural predictors of treatment outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Trails | Baseline | This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed