Dual Trigger, Urinary HCG or Recombinant HCG, Which is the Best !?

Dual Trigger, Urinary HCG or Recombinant HCG, Which is the Best !? a Prospective Randomized Controlled Comparative Study

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04265495

Enrollment

600

Registered

2020-02-11

Start date

2020-02-09

Completion date

2021-12-01

Last updated

2021-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

IVF

Keywords

Dual trigger implantation,, HCG, OHSS, ANTAGONIST

Brief summary

a comparative study among dual trigger, urinary HCG and recombinant HCG regarding the outcome of ICSI- antagonist cycles

Detailed description

a comparative study among dual trigger, urinary HCG and recombinant HCG regarding the outcome (oocyte quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate as well as the incidence of OHSS) in ICSI- antagonist cycles

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

OTHER

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

22 Years to 40 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients \<40 years of age who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles using a GnRH antagonist protocol

Exclusion criteria

* age: \> 40 years * BMI \> 30 , * long agonist protocol * were chromosomal and genetic disorders, abnormal ultrasonogram of the uterine cavity

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
clinical pregnancy rate,	4 WEEKS
implantation rate,	2 WEEKS
incidence of OHSS.	1 WEEK

Countries

Bahrain

Contacts

Primary ContactKamal eldin Rageh, M.D.

dr_kamal_rageh@yahoo.com0097333153871

Backup ContactAhmed Barakat, FRCOG

ahmed.barakat@yahoo.com0097317727888

Outcome results