Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Robotic Assisted Rectal Cancer Resection Alone vs. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Robotic Assisted Rectal Cancer Resection Alone vs. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04265417
Enrollment
98
Registered
2020-02-11
Start date
2015-01-06
Completion date
2016-12-01
Last updated
2020-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery, Rectal Neoplasms, Robotic Surgery

Brief summary

Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery for patients with rectal cancer. However, it's safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone vs. robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to discuss aforementioned question.

Detailed description

Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery for patients with rectal cancer. However, it's safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone vs. robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to discuss aforementioned question. From January 2015 to November 2016, a consecutive wave of 49 patients underwent robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction and 49 matched patients underwent conventional robotic assisted rectal cancer resection were systematically analyzed in this study.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobotic Assisted Rectal Cancer Resection Alone

participants in this group underwent robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone, the specimens were extracted through the incision on the abdominal wall.

PROCEDURERobotic Assisted Rectal Cancer Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

participants in this group underwent robotic rectal cancer resection,the specimens were extractd through anus and vagina.

Sponsors

Taiyuan Li
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. T stage 1-3; 2. aged between 18 to 75; 3. the tumor margin is at least 4 cm from the anus; 4. body mass index ≤30kg/m2; 5. no distant metastases; (6)tumor size≤5cm.

Exclusion criteria

1. emergency surgery for intestinal obstruction or massive bleeding; 2. history of abdominal or pelvic surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalUp to 36 monthsTo determine the survival differences between NOSE group and RARC group. Overall survival is defined as the time from surgery to death from any causes
Disease-free survivalUp to 36 monthsTo determine the survival differences between NOSE group and RARC group. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from surgery to local or distant recurrence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative hospital stay30 daysTo determine the surgical and patients burdern differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Postoperative visual analogue scale scale on day 11 dayTo determine the surgical differences between NOSE group and RARC group. Maxium sacle is 10, miniun scale is 0. 0 represents no pain. 10 represents maximun pain.
Time to pass flatus30 daysTo determine the surgical differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Hospitalization costs30 dayto determine the patients burden differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Specimen length30 dayTo determine the surgical differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Proximal margin30 dayTo determine the pathological differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Operation time1 dayTo determine the differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Histological differentiation30 daysTo determine the pathological differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Number of lymph nodes harvested30 daysTo determine the pathological differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Postoperative white blood cell count30 daysTo determine the surgical stress response differences NOSE group and RARC group
Postoperative procalcitonin30 daysTo determine the surgical stress response differences NOSE group and RARC group
Postoperative C-reactive protein30 daysTo determine the surgical stress response differences NOSE group and RARC group
Distal margin30 daysTo determine the pathological differences between NOSE group and RARC group
Estimated intraoperative blood loss1 dayTo determine the differences between NOSE group and RARC group

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026