Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer Disease, Late Onset, Cognitive Deterioration
Conditions
Keywords
TMS, rTMS, Alzheimer Disease
Brief summary
Severe alterations of brain networks connectivity have been described in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has gained evidence as an effective tool to modulate brain networks connectivity, leading to a recovery or reorganization of both local and remote brain regions functionally connected to the stimulated area. The investogators propose an innovative tailored network-based rTMS treatment to ameliorate cognitive symptoms in mild AD, through the boosting of connectivity within brain networks affected by AD pathophysiology. The combination of the proposed intervention with an integrated multi-modal imaging approach will allow to evaluate the neural mechanisms underlying the clinical response to the treatment and to define quantitative markers of clinical impact on AD. If successful, the present proposal would immediately impact on patient's quality of life, with important implications for the time and costs of delivery of rehabilitative services.
Detailed description
Currently, no effective cure is available for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has gained increasing attention as a potential treatment for various neurological and psychiatric disorders, but available rTMS studies are flawed by inaccurate anatomical targeting, inadequate sample size, unsatisfactory controls and lacking blindness. To date, the elective target area of rTMS interventions in AD has been the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a core area of the Central Executive network (CEN), which plays a key role in regulating executive functions, attention and working memory. While the CEN has recently been described as dysfunctional in AD, AD pathophysiology has been mainly associated with the breakdown of the Default Mode network (DMN) and with structural disconnection of its parietal nodes. The DMN plays a crucial role in episodic memory retrieval and incorporates various brain regions, among which parietal areas are highly connected with the rest of the brain. The present multicenter, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study has the ambition to provide evidence of the efficacy of two tailored network-based rTMS treatments in mild AD, through the enhancement of connectivity of CEN and DMN. Innovative integrated multi-modal imaging investigations will further enrich this proposal allowing to identify quantifiable markers underlying the clinical impact of rTMS on AD.
Interventions
DEVICErTMS
25 min of high frequency (20 Hz) repetitive TMS applied at 100% of resting motor threshold (rMT).
DEVICESham rTMS
Placebo intervention will consist in the same procedure but using a sham rTMS coil.
Sponsors
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
Ministero della Salute, Italy
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The study will be a double blind trial, i.e. both patients and clinicians involved in the assessment will be blind to treatment allocation.
Intervention model description
After recruitment, patients will be randomized and assigned to one of three rTMS treatments: DMN (N=20), CEN (N=20) or placebo (N=20). The rTMS treatment will consist of 2 phases: an intensive phase and a maintenance phase. The intensive phase will involve 3 weeks of treatment, 5 days per week (15 sessions in total). The maintenance will consist of 1 session of treatment every 2 weeks for 5 months (10 sessions in total). Overall, the patients will undergo 25 sessions of rTMS delivered over 6 months. At baseline (T0), at the end of the intensive phase (T1) and at the end of the maintenance phase (T2) all patients will undergo a clinical and cognitive assessment and a multi-modal imaging data collection.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Mini-Mental State Examination score \>=16, \<=24 * Anti-cholinesterase treatment for at least 3 months prior the start date
Exclusion criteria
* Enrollment in other clinical and pharmacological trials * Previous evidence of any other CNS disorder (e.g. epilepsy, infectious diseases, frontotemporal, Parkinson or Pick's disease) * History of major psychiatric disorders * History of alchol or substance abuse * Stress-related skin problems * Current consumption of psychiatric medication * Presence of metal implants or any implanted electronics
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in ADAS-Cog scale scores | At baseline (T0), up to 4 weeks (T1), through study completion, an average of 6 months (T2) | A brief neuropsychological assessment used to assess the severity of cognitive symptoms of dementia |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in CANTAB battery scores | At baseline (T0), up to 4 weeks (T1), through study completion, an average of 6 months (T2) | The scores on two tests of CANTAB battery (www.cambridgecognition.com): * Change in Associative Learning test (PAL) * Change in Spatial Working Memory test (SWM) |
| Change in brain connectivity | At baseline (T0), up to 4 weeks (T1), through study completion, an average of 6 months (T2) | TMS-evoked cortical responses (TEPs) will serve as markers of reactivity of the stimulated area as well as markers of the connectivity between targeted cortex and functionally connected areas underlying DMN or CEN. |
| Change in brain plasticity | At baseline (T0), up to 4 weeks (T1), through study completion, an average of 6 months (T2) | A theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol will be used to probe plasticity changes |
| Change in MRI measures of functional and structural connectivity | At baseline (T0), up to 4 weeks (T1), through study completion, an average of 6 months (T2) | — |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactDebora Brignani
Outcome results
None listed