Clinical Evaluation of Four Aesthetic Restorations in Non-carious Cervical Lesions

Clinical Evaluation of Four Aesthetic Restorations in Non-carious Cervical Lesions: a Randomised Controlled Split-mouth Clinical Trial

Status

Withdrawn

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04261140

Enrollment

Registered

2020-02-07

Start date

2019-07-31

Completion date

2021-05-31

Last updated

2020-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Noncarious Cervical Lesions

Keywords

High-viscosity glass ionomer, bulkfill composite, flowable composite, nanohybrid composite, cervical lesion

Brief summary

To compare the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer, flowable composite, bulkfill composite and nanohybrid composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).

Detailed description

One hundred fourty NCCLs were randomised into four groups according to a split-mouth design. Clinical evaluations will be performed after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.

Interventions

OTHEREQUIA Forte Fil

Apply cavity conditioner (20% polyacrylic acid) 10 s on enamel and dentine, rinse Mix 10 s and apply bulk-fill Apply EQUIA coat and light cure for 20 s unit

OTHERClearfil Majesty Esthetic

Apply in 2-mm increment, light cure for 20 s

OTHERNexComp Flow

Apply in 2-mm increment light cure for 20 s

OTHER3M Espe Bulk-fill

Apply in single increment up to 4 mm; light curing for 20 s

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

20 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* had at least four non-carious symmetrical cervical lesions, * had permanent dentition and were older than 20 years old, * had cervical margins in dentin

Exclusion criteria

* periodontal disease * pregnant or breastfeeding * being under orthodontic therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
evaluation of restoration on cervical lesions	6 months	According to FDI criteria (aesthetic, biological and fuctional) score 1, clinically very good; score 2, clinically good; score 3, clinically sufficient; score 4, clinically unsatisfactory; score 5, clinically poor. Scores 1-3 show clinically acceptable restoration, while scores 4 and 5 indicate failure

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026