Skip to content

Is Long-term Use of Amantadine Effective in PD?

Is Long-term Use of Amantadine Effective in Parkinson Disease?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04260581
Enrollment
32
Registered
2020-02-07
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2020-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Parkinson's disease, Amantadine, Long-term effect

Brief summary

The investigator aims to assess whether long-term use of amantadine is effective in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Detailed description

Amantadine is used in the early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, amantadine is known to be relatively weak compared to other antiparkinsonian drugs such as levodopa, dopamine agonist or Mao-B inhibitor and its effects are limited in early months, so it is rarely used than other drugs. Recently, several studies have identified the long-term effects of amantadine on dyskinesia, but the basis is still insufficient. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the long-term effectiveness of amantadine in patients with PD. Participants who have used amantadine since the early stages of diagnosis undergo clinical evaluations including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Freezing of Gait-Questionnaire (FOG-Q), Non-motor Symptom Scale (NMSS) and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). Then, participants stop taking amantadine. To investigate the long-term effect, clinical evaluations except MoCA are repetitively assessed at 4- and 8-week follow-ups.

Interventions

DRUGDetermination of drug effects through amantadine cessation

Patients will discontinue amantadine, which has been taken since beginning of diagnosis.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients who have been taking amantadine since the beginning of diagnosis 2. Patients who have taken amantadine for more than five years 3. Patients with Parkinson's disease who are aged 40 years or older

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient who stops amantadine or is hypersensitive to amantadine 2. Patients who have undergone brain surgery, including deep brain stimulation 3. Patient identified as atypical parkinsonism 4. Patients with psychiatric conditions such as dementia, major depression or bipolar disorder who are difficult to assess 5. Patients who are currently unable to follow up at our hospital

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scoreBaseline, 4 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 132\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scoreBaseline, 8 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 132\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II scoreBaseline, 4 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 52\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II scoreBaseline, 8 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 52\]
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV scoreBaseline, 4 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 24\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV scoreBaseline, 8 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 24\]
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Hohr and Yahr stage scoreBaseline, 4 weeksHohr and Yahr stage score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 5\]
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 scoreBaseline, 4 weeksParkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 156\]
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I scoreBaseline, 4 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 52\]
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Freezing of Gait Questionnaire scoreBaseline, 4 weeksFreezing of Gait Questionnaire score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 24\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Freezing of Gait Questionnaire scoreBaseline, 8 weeksFreezing of Gait Questionnaire score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 24\]
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Non-motor Symptom Scale scoreBaseline, 4 weeksNon-motor Symptom Scale score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 360\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Non-motor Symptom Scale scoreBaseline, 8 weeksNon-motor Symptom Scale score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 360\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 scoreBaseline, 8 weeksParkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 156\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Hohr and Yahr stage scoreBaseline, 8 weeksHohr and Yahr stage score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 5\]
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I scoreBaseline, 8 weeksMovement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. \[minimum 0, maximum 52\]

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026