Breast Cancer, Physical Activity
Conditions
Keywords
active video game, telemedicine, cancer survivor, women's health, support group, survivorship, mhealth
Brief summary
Breast cancer survivors, from diagnosis until the end of life, go through many transitions. One major transition is the significant decrease of physical activity immediately after diagnosis. Despite the known benefits of physical activity-speeding recovery time and reduced cancer recurrence risk-only 1 in 3 survivors met physical activity recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week. Physical activity interventions have shown effectiveness in helping breast cancer survivors increase physical activity during treatment, but limited evidence-based physical activity interventions have been incorporated into the clinic and community. To address this limitation, the investigators are partnering with the UTMB breast cancer support group to conduct a 12-week physical activity intervention, Pink Warrior. The goal of this study is to compare an intervention that uses active games versus an intervention uses pedometer to encourage physical activity such as walking within breast cancer survivors in active cancer treatment. The study will include breast cancer survivor between the ages of 18 - 70 whom currently gets less than 150 minutes of planned physical activity per week and received a breast cancer diagnosis within 0 to 6 months. Participants will be randomized to participate in the support group using the active video game-based physical activity intervention (Wii and Xbox active games) or to participate in the existing UTMB breast cancer support group with pedometers (Digi-Walker CW-700/701). The investigators hypothesize that by engaging in active video gaming, breast cancer survivors will be motivated to initiate and maintain physical activity during treatment. This will ultimately increase functional capacity and prevent functional disability in breast cancer survivors.
Detailed description
Increasing and maintaining physical activity among female breast cancer (BC) survivors during treatment remains an unresolved problem in BC survivorship care. BC survivors, from diagnosis until the end of life, go through many transitions. One major transition is the significant decline of physical activity immediately after diagnosis. Despite the known benefits of physical activity-speeding recovery time and reduced cancer recurrence risk-less than 30% of survivors met physical activity recommendations. Physical activity interventions have shown effectiveness in helping BC survivors increase activity during treatment, but limited evidence-based activity interventions have been disseminated into the clinic and community. To address this limitation, we are partnering with the UTMB breast cancer support group to conduct a 12-week physical activity intervention, Pink Warrior, which will investigate the feasibility of implementing active video game-based physical activity intervention among BC survivors undergoing treatment within the support group setting. Participants (N = 60) will be randomized to participate in the support group using the active video game-based physical activity intervention or to participate in the existing UTMB breast cancer support group with pedometers. Our specific aims are: Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of active video game-based physical activity intervention among BC survivors undergoing treatment within the support group setting. Measures of feasibility will include weekly attendance records, number of completed home-based worksheets, number of participants completing the program activities, technological issues, and adverse events. Aim 2: Compare the support group using the active video game-based physical activity intervention to the existing UTMB breast cancer support group with pedometer. Primary outcomes will be changes in physical activity. Secondary outcomes will be changes in physical function, dietary pattern, and quality of life. Aim 3: Develop tools for implementation of the Pink Warrior intervention within the clinic and community settings. A trainer's manual for the Pink Warrior intervention will be developed and UTMB Breast Cancer Support Group facilitators will be trained by research staff to implement the program.
Interventions
12 sessions of teleconferenced support group meetings, including active video game play + self-paced walking monitored by Fitbit wearable device
3 monthly sessions of in-person standard support group meetings + self-paced walking monitored by pedometer
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Provide informed consent 2. Diagnosed with primary female breast cancer 3. 55 years to 79 4. Able to speak, read, and write in English 5. Able to travel to UTMB locations and/or MD Anderson Victory Lakes 6. Able to move arms and les as well as ambulate 7. Has a smartphone, tablet or computer and daily access to a reliable internet
Exclusion criteria
1. Pregnancy 2. Diagnosed dementia 3. Currently engage in 150 minutes or more of planned moderate intensity physical activity 4. Currently involved in another physical activity intervention
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Walking Physical Activity as Measured by Change in Daily Steps From Baseline to 14 Weeks | Baseline to 14 weeks | Difference in mean of daily steps taken from Actigraph accelerometer worn for 7 day period from baseline assessment to 14 week assessment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life as Measured by the Change in FACT-B Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks | Baseline to 14 weeks | Quality of life score as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast measure at follow-up, scored for physical, social, emotional, functional, and breast well-being (here we report the total score of these subscales). The range for this scale is 0-123, with 0 indicating a better outcome. |
| Physical Performance as Measured by the Change in Short Physical Performance Battery Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks | Baseline to 14 weeks | Difference in physical performance as measured by Short Physical Performance Battery from baseline to 14 weeks. The numbers reported here are the sum of scores from the subscales. The range for this measure is between 0-12, with lower scores indicating better outcomes. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Body Weight in kg | Baseline to 14 weeks | Mean body weight as measured by a calibrated scale in a cancer clinic setting |
| Waist Circumference in cm | Baseline to 14 weeks | Mean waist circumference as measured by Seca-203 measuring tape |
| Dietary Pattern | Baseline to 14 weeks | Dietary pattern change measured by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-10) measuring fruits, vegetables, dairy/calcium, added sugar, whole grains/fiber, red meat, and processed meat consumption within the past 30 days |
| Self-reported Physical Activity Minutes | Baseline to 14 weeks | Minutes of physical activity as self-reported using the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire |
| Self-reported Physical Function | Baseline to 14 weeks | Physical function score as measured by the PROMIS cancer-specific instrument (PROMIS-CA Bank v1.1-Physical Function) |
| Fatigue | Baseline to 14 weeks | Fatigue score as measured by the PROMIS cancer-specific instrument (PROMIS-Ca Bank v1.1-Fatigue) |
| Exercise Motivation Measured as Autonomous Regulation | Baseline to 14 weeks | Autonomous regulation as measured by the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 |
| Walking Skills in Daily Life | Baseline to 14 weeks | Walking skills as measured by the Figure-of-8 Walk test |
| Self-regulation: Exercise Goal-Setting (EGS) and Exercise Planning and Scheduling Scale (EPS) | Baseline to 14 weeks | Goal-setting and planning measures, adapted from a published, untitled series of items created by Rovniak et al for evaluation of technology-mediated health promotion content. 10 EGS and 10 EPS items on a 5-point Likert scale. Range: 1 (does not describe) to 5 (describes completely) of the goal setting and planning strategies. The higher the score means more exercise goal-setting and planning behavior. (Rovniak et al. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2002, 24(2): 149-156.) |
| Feasibility - Adherence | Baseline to 14 weeks | Adherence as measured by number of participants who complete at least 80% of program activities |
| Feasibility - Attrition | Baseline to 14 weeks | Attrition as measured by percentage of people who drop out of the program |
| Feasibility - Technological Issues | Baseline to 14 weeks | Technological issues will be measured by counting the number of reported occurrences |
| Feasibility - Adverse Events | Baseline to 14 weeks | Adverse events will be measured by counting the number of occurrences |
| Acceptability Scale | Baseline to 14 weeks | Acceptability and satisfaction will be assessed via Vandelanotte questionnaire with 5-point scale responses, measures are adapted from a published, untitled series of items created by Vandelanotte et al for evaluation of technology-mediated health promotion content. Acceptability and feasibility of 3 components on a 5-point Likert scale-activity monitor (7-item), program team (6-item), and the program itself (15-item). Ranged: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The higher the score means that it is more acceptable and feasible. (Vandelanotte, C. and I. De Bourdeaudhuij (2003). Acceptability and feasibility of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention using stages of change: project FAITH. Health Educ Res 18(3): 304-317 and Vandelanotte, C., et al. (2004). Acceptability and feasibility of an interactive computer-tailored fat intake intervention in Belgium. Health Promot Int 19(4): 463-470.) |
| Psychological Feelings Related to Exercise | Baseline to 14 weeks | Perceptions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness as measured by the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise scale. 11 items on a 5-point Likert scale. Range: 1 (I do not agree at all) to 5 (I completely agree) for each of the constructs-autonomy (1-20), competence (1-20), and relatedness (1-15). The higher the score means more autonomy, more competence, and relatedness. |
| Hand Grip Strength | Baseline to 14 weeks | Flexor muscle strength of hand and forearm measured by dynamometer |
| Physical Function as Measured by the Senior Fitness Test | Baseline to 14 weeks | Physical function scores on six components: chair stands, arm curls, chair sit and reach, back scratch, 8 foot up and go, and 2 minute step in place test |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active Video Game Teleconference Support Group Participants will attend enhanced support group meetings via zoom teleconferencing software. Support group meetings will include group play of active video games and discussion of survivorship topics. Participants will self-monitor physical activity using Fitbit wearable activity monitors and will receive a water bottle and tote bag.
Active video game teleconference support group: 12 sessions of teleconferenced support group meetings, including active video game play + self-paced walking monitored by Fitbit wearable device | 10 |
| Standard Support Group + Pedometer Participants will attend standard in-person support groups currently offered by the UTMB Breast Health Center. They will also receive a standard pedometer and a water bottle and tote bag.
Standard support group + pedometer: 3 monthly sessions of in-person standard support group meetings + self-paced walking monitored by pedometer | 10 |
| Total | 20 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Active Video Game Teleconference Support Group | Total | Standard Support Group + Pedometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64.90 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.03 | 63.75 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.35 | 62.60 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 19 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 8 Participants | 16 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 10 participants | 20 participants | 10 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants | 20 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Walking Physical Activity as Measured by Change in Daily Steps From Baseline to 14 Weeks
Difference in mean of daily steps taken from Actigraph accelerometer worn for 7 day period from baseline assessment to 14 week assessment
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Population: One person dropped out of the study shortly after randomization in the standard group and did not have a baseline step value
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Video Game Teleconference Support Group | Walking Physical Activity as Measured by Change in Daily Steps From Baseline to 14 Weeks | -229.52 steps | Standard Deviation 1905.94 |
| Standard Support Group + Pedometer | Walking Physical Activity as Measured by Change in Daily Steps From Baseline to 14 Weeks | 1570.17 steps | Standard Deviation 2355.59 |
Physical Performance as Measured by the Change in Short Physical Performance Battery Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks
Difference in physical performance as measured by Short Physical Performance Battery from baseline to 14 weeks. The numbers reported here are the sum of scores from the subscales. The range for this measure is between 0-12, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Population: One person in the standard group dropped out of the study shortly after randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Video Game Teleconference Support Group | Physical Performance as Measured by the Change in Short Physical Performance Battery Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks | 1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Standard Support Group + Pedometer | Physical Performance as Measured by the Change in Short Physical Performance Battery Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks | 0.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
Quality of Life as Measured by the Change in FACT-B Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks
Quality of life score as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast measure at follow-up, scored for physical, social, emotional, functional, and breast well-being (here we report the total score of these subscales). The range for this scale is 0-123, with 0 indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Population: One person dropped out of the standard group shortly after randomization. An additional person in each group had missing values at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Video Game Teleconference Support Group | Quality of Life as Measured by the Change in FACT-B Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks | 8.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.07 |
| Standard Support Group + Pedometer | Quality of Life as Measured by the Change in FACT-B Scores From Baseline to 14 Weeks | -1.69 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
Acceptability Scale
Acceptability and satisfaction will be assessed via Vandelanotte questionnaire with 5-point scale responses, measures are adapted from a published, untitled series of items created by Vandelanotte et al for evaluation of technology-mediated health promotion content. Acceptability and feasibility of 3 components on a 5-point Likert scale-activity monitor (7-item), program team (6-item), and the program itself (15-item). Ranged: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The higher the score means that it is more acceptable and feasible. (Vandelanotte, C. and I. De Bourdeaudhuij (2003). Acceptability and feasibility of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention using stages of change: project FAITH. Health Educ Res 18(3): 304-317 and Vandelanotte, C., et al. (2004). Acceptability and feasibility of an interactive computer-tailored fat intake intervention in Belgium. Health Promot Int 19(4): 463-470.)
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Body Weight in kg
Mean body weight as measured by a calibrated scale in a cancer clinic setting
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Dietary Pattern
Dietary pattern change measured by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-10) measuring fruits, vegetables, dairy/calcium, added sugar, whole grains/fiber, red meat, and processed meat consumption within the past 30 days
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Exercise Motivation Measured as Autonomous Regulation
Autonomous regulation as measured by the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Fatigue
Fatigue score as measured by the PROMIS cancer-specific instrument (PROMIS-Ca Bank v1.1-Fatigue)
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Feasibility - Adherence
Adherence as measured by number of participants who complete at least 80% of program activities
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Feasibility - Adverse Events
Adverse events will be measured by counting the number of occurrences
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Feasibility - Attrition
Attrition as measured by percentage of people who drop out of the program
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Feasibility - Technological Issues
Technological issues will be measured by counting the number of reported occurrences
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Hand Grip Strength
Flexor muscle strength of hand and forearm measured by dynamometer
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Physical Function as Measured by the Senior Fitness Test
Physical function scores on six components: chair stands, arm curls, chair sit and reach, back scratch, 8 foot up and go, and 2 minute step in place test
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Psychological Feelings Related to Exercise
Perceptions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness as measured by the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise scale. 11 items on a 5-point Likert scale. Range: 1 (I do not agree at all) to 5 (I completely agree) for each of the constructs-autonomy (1-20), competence (1-20), and relatedness (1-15). The higher the score means more autonomy, more competence, and relatedness.
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Self-regulation: Exercise Goal-Setting (EGS) and Exercise Planning and Scheduling Scale (EPS)
Goal-setting and planning measures, adapted from a published, untitled series of items created by Rovniak et al for evaluation of technology-mediated health promotion content. 10 EGS and 10 EPS items on a 5-point Likert scale. Range: 1 (does not describe) to 5 (describes completely) of the goal setting and planning strategies. The higher the score means more exercise goal-setting and planning behavior. (Rovniak et al. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2002, 24(2): 149-156.)
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Self-reported Physical Activity Minutes
Minutes of physical activity as self-reported using the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Self-reported Physical Function
Physical function score as measured by the PROMIS cancer-specific instrument (PROMIS-CA Bank v1.1-Physical Function)
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Waist Circumference in cm
Mean waist circumference as measured by Seca-203 measuring tape
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Walking Skills in Daily Life
Walking skills as measured by the Figure-of-8 Walk test
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks