Skip to content

Histopathologic Effect of Calcium Electroporation on Cancer in the Skin

Phase II Investigation of the Histopathologic Effect of Calcium Electroporation on Cancer in the Skin (CAEP-B)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04259658
Acronym
CAEP-B
Enrollment
17
Registered
2020-02-06
Start date
2020-04-20
Completion date
2023-07-27
Last updated
2023-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

calcium, electroporation, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, cancer, metastases

Brief summary

In this phase II study we investigate the effect of calcium electroporation on cancer in the skin investigated by histopathology.

Detailed description

In this non randomized phase II study, we will explore histopathological tumour cell death mechanisms in 24 patients with breast cancer metastases or other cutaneous or subcutaneous malignancy. The primary endpoint of the biopsy study is to evaluate differences in tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) population in tissue samples from treated cancer tumours two days after calcium electroporation treatment compared to samples taken on the day of treatment before the calcium electroporation procedure. TIL content in biopsies will be evaluated by pathological examination and specified in percent of cells. Patients will be followed up to 3 months and depending on number of treated tumors, biopsies will be taken at different timepoints after one or two treatments with calcium electroporation. Other analyses will include differences regarding tumour type, immune marker expression levels over time, vascular effects and regressive changes as well as examining changes in systemic immunological markers.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTCalcium electroporation

Patients with cutaneous metastases will be treated with calcium electroporation.

Sponsors

Zealand University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective phase II clinical study: Patients with cutaneous metastases will be recruited at the Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital (ZUH). One cohort of 24 patients with respectively disseminated breast cancer or other solid tumour malignancies, will be included. This will be a non-randomized trial. All patients will have been offered the standard of care and all available alternatives before entering the protocol. Calcium electroporation will not be compared to other means of treatment. All patients will be treated once and patients with over 3 metastases will be offered retreatment of some of their metastases. A maximum of 2 treatments per patient will be conducted with an interval of minimum 4 weeks. The patients will be followed with regular examinations for 3 months, starting from first treatment day.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Trial subject must be able to understand the participant information. * Histologically verified cutaneous or subcutaneous, primary or secondary cancer of any histology. * The patient can undergo any simultaneous medical treatment (endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy etc.). * The patient can undergo radiation therapy during the study period, provided that the treatment field does not involve the treated area. * Performance status ECOG/WHO ≤2 * At least one cutaneous or subcutaneous tumour measuring at least 5 mm. * Both men and women who are sexually active must use safe contraception (contraceptive coil, deposit injection of gestagen, subdermal implantation, hormonal vaginal ring or transdermal patch.) * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation * Allergy to local anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effect of calcium electroporation on tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) population.2 daysThe primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate differences in TIL population in tissue samples from treated cancer tumours two days after calcium electroporation treatment compared to before treatment (biopsy taken on the day of treatment before the calcium electroporation procedure). TIL content in biopsies will be evaluated by pathological examination and expressed as percent of cells.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumour inflammation signature (TIS)3 monthsGene expression signatures including the 18-gene TIS will be calculated as a weighted linear average of the constituent genes.
Molecular subtype classification3 monthsGene expression profiling according to tumour histology.
Size of lesion3 monthsTo clinically measure changes in lesion size 1, 2 and 3 months after treatment using caliper measurement. Changes in size due to biopsies will be accounted for.
TIL population and tumour type3 monthsTo describe any relation between change in TIL population (percentage of cells) and tumour type before and after calcium electroporation.
Tumour regression3 monthsTo describe presence of regressive changes including necrosis at different timepoints (percentage of tissue).
Residual tumour3 monthsTo describe presence of residual tumour (yes/no) and description of topographical location.
Vascular effects3 monthsTo investigate vascular effects of calcium electroporation including changes in capillary structures by histochemical staining for endothelial biomarkers CD31 and/or CD34.
Clinical response to intervention3 monthsTo document evolution of tumours before and after treatment using digital photography including a ruler.
Complete response at patient level3 monthsTo sum number of patients with complete response after one or two treatments, respectively. Complete response will be defined as disappearance of all target lesions.
Complete disappearance of treated lesions (in relation to all lesions treated)3 monthsTo sum number of lesions across all patients with complete remission after one or two treatments, respectively (expressed at percentage of all treated lesions).
Tumour type3 monthsTo establish number of treated tumours with complete response depending on tumour type.
Changes in immune markers3 monthsProtein expression levels of immune markers e.g. markers for the innate and adaptive immune system and markers of the STING pathway compared from before treatment and at different timepoints up to 3 months.
Importance of previous irradiation3 monthsTo investigate differences in effect depending whether the treated tumour was in a previously irradiated area.
Adjacent non-tumour tissue3 monthsTo evaluate effect on adjacent non-tumour tissue.
PD-L1 expression over time3 monthsTo assess PD-L1 expression over time by biopsy.
Relation between change in PD-L1 expression and response3 monthsTo investigate any relation between change in PD-L1 expression and tumour response.
PD-L1 expression in relation to cell types3 monthsTo describe PD-L1 expression in relation to cell types found in the tumour environment
PD-L1 expression of different tumour histologies3 monthsTo describe PD-L1 expression on different cell types of the different tumour histologies investigated.
Western blotting3 monthsTo examine frozen tissues samples by western blotting in order to support any of the above mentioned endpoints.
Systemic immune factors after calcium electroporation3 monthsBlood samples may be analyzed for NK cell- and T-cell gene expression levels. Levels before and after treatment will be compared.
Current measurement1 monthTo measure current during treatment as indicated by the pulse generator.
PCR3 monthsTo examine frozen tissues samples by PCR. Relevant gene expression will be compared before and after treatment in breast cancer and non breast cancer samples.
Systemic immunologic response3 monthsTo detect signs of systemic immunologic response from any routine scans before and after treatment in the inclusion period.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026