Skip to content

Liposomal Bupivacaine With or Without Hydromorphone for the Improvement of Pain Control After Laparotomy in Patients With Gynecological Malignancies

Wound Infiltration With Liposomal Bupivacaine With or Without Intrathecal Analgesia in Laparotomy for Gynecological Malignancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04258631
Enrollment
105
Registered
2020-02-06
Start date
2020-07-09
Completion date
2023-08-08
Last updated
2024-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm

Brief summary

This phase IV trial studies how well liposomal bupivacaine with or without hydromorphone works in improving pain control during the first 24 hours after surgery in patients with gynecological malignancies undergoing laparotomy. Liposomal bupivacaine is routinely infiltrated into the skin surrounding the abdominal incision, and is effective in providing good relief of incisional pain. Hydromorphone is also a type of pain medication that may provide better management of deep abdominal pain. It is not yet known if giving liposomal bupivacaine with or without hydromorphone will work better in improving pain in patients with gynecological malignancies during the first 24 hours after surgery.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate if no additional intervention is noninferior to intrathecal analgesia (ITA) for postoperative pain experience 24 hours after surgery after laparotomy for gynecological malignancy within an established enhanced recovery pathway which includes incisional liposomal bupivacaine (ILB). II. Evaluate the effect of intrathecal analgesia on patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia after laparotomy for gynecological malignancy. III. Report the impact of ITA use on cost. IV. Validate the Quality of Recovery (QOR)-15 in our population. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine. ARM II: Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine and hydromorphone intrathecally (IT).

Interventions

DRUGHydromorphone

Given IT

PROCEDURELaparotomy

Undergo laparotomy

DRUGLiposomal Bupivacaine

Drug

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgery for suspected (based on consulting surgeon's opinion-imaging, laboratory \[lab\], pathology \[path\]) gynecological malignancy, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to read or understand English * Prehospitalization narcotic use if weekly average daily oral morphine equivalent of \> 20 mg * Chronic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia * Extensive surgery planned (surrogate for post-operative \[postop\] pain): Planned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, abdominoperineal resection, exenteration, use of intraoperative radiation (IORT), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) * Contraindication to neuraxial analgesia: * Coagulopathy * International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.2 current or predicted after surgery (e.g. planned right hepatic resection) * Thrombocytopenia. Platelets (plts) \< 100 * Hemophiliac disease states (hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, etc.) * Patients receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy are excluded according to the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) guidelines * Localized infection at the potential site of injection * Significant developmental or structural spinal abnormalities that would preclude a safe spinal technique. These include spina bifida, tethered spinal cord, lumbar spinal fusion, and active lumbar radiculopathy * Patients with stage 4 or 5 kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] less than 30 ml/min per 1.73 m\^2) * Intolerance or allergy to opioids, acetaminophen, or amide-type local anesthetics * Current pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)Up to 24 hours after surgeryThe Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) is a multi-dimensional survey that measures a patient's benefit from postoperative pain therapy. It assesses pain intensity, opioid-related adverse events, and patient satisfaction with analgesia. Each of 7 questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 where 0=minimal/not at all and 4=maximum/very much. The total score is a sum of the 7 item scores with question 7 scored as 4 minus the patient reported number. Total scores range from 0 to 28 with lower scores representing greater benefit from analgesic therapy. The median total OBAS score for each group is presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative 24-hour Narcotic ConsumptionUp to 24 hours after surgeryVarious narcotic medications are standardized and reported as Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME).
Post-operative Pain ScoresUp to 24 hours after surgeryPostoperative pain is scored on a scale of 0 - 10, with the lower score showing a better outcome.
Time to First Analgesic RequestUp to 24 hours after surgeryAmount of time from leaving surgery to the first request for pain relief.
Use of Intravenous (IV) Patient-controlled AnalgesiaUp to 24 hours after surgeryNumber of patients that used IV, patient controlled analgesia after surgery.
Use of Intravenous Rescue OpioidsUp to 24 hours after surgeryNumber of patients that needed IV rescue opioids after surgery.
Length of StayUp to 1 week after surgeryLength of associated hospitalization in days.
Weight Gain Following SurgeryUp to 24 hours after surgeryWeight difference post- and pre-surgery.
Total Cost of CareEntire hospitalization, approximately 2-5 daysAll medical costs occurring during hospitalization.
Incidence of Adverse EventsUp to 24 hours after surgeryReported as the number participants reporting one or more adverse events on each study arm.
Operating Room TimeApproximately 8 hoursLength of time from when the patient entered the operating room to when they left.
Surgical TimeApproximately 8 hoursTime from first incision to surgical site closure.
Pain ManagementWhole hospitalization, approximately 2-5 daysPharmaceutical costs associated with pain management.
Additional Fluid Requirement After 24 Hours of SurgeryUp to 24 hours after surgeryNumber of patients requiring additional IV fluids after surgery.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Total ScoreAt 24 hours after surgeryThe Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire is a 15-item survey that patients rate to measure the quality of their recovery after surgery. Each item in the questionnaire is graded on an 11-point numeric rating scale with total scores ranging from 15 to 150. Higher scores indicate better recovery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)
Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine. Laparotomy: Undergo laparotomy Liposomal Bupivacaine: Drug Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
59
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)
Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine and hydromorphone IT. Hydromorphone: Given IT Laparotomy: Undergo laparotomy Liposomal Bupivacaine: Drug Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
46
Total105

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
28 Participants22 Participants50 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
31 Participants24 Participants55 Participants
Age, Continuous56 years56.5 years56 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
55 Participants46 Participants101 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants46 Participants101 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
59 participants46 participants105 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants46 Participants105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 590 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 590 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 591 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)

The Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) is a multi-dimensional survey that measures a patient's benefit from postoperative pain therapy. It assesses pain intensity, opioid-related adverse events, and patient satisfaction with analgesia. Each of 7 questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 where 0=minimal/not at all and 4=maximum/very much. The total score is a sum of the 7 item scores with question 7 scored as 4 minus the patient reported number. Total scores range from 0 to 28 with lower scores representing greater benefit from analgesic therapy. The median total OBAS score for each group is presented.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)4 score on a scale
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)4 score on a scale
Secondary

Additional Fluid Requirement After 24 Hours of Surgery

Number of patients requiring additional IV fluids after surgery.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Additional Fluid Requirement After 24 Hours of Surgery27 Participants
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Additional Fluid Requirement After 24 Hours of Surgery24 Participants
Secondary

Cumulative 24-hour Narcotic Consumption

Various narcotic medications are standardized and reported as Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME).

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Cumulative 24-hour Narcotic Consumption41.4 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)Standard Deviation 31.9
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Cumulative 24-hour Narcotic Consumption17.5 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)Standard Deviation 25
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events

Reported as the number participants reporting one or more adverse events on each study arm.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Incidence of Adverse Events0 Participants
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Incidence of Adverse Events1 Participants
Secondary

Length of Stay

Length of associated hospitalization in days.

Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Length of Stay3.8 days
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Length of Stay3.4 days
Secondary

Operating Room Time

Length of time from when the patient entered the operating room to when they left.

Time frame: Approximately 8 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Operating Room Time6.2 hours
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Operating Room Time5.8 hours
Secondary

Pain Management

Pharmaceutical costs associated with pain management.

Time frame: Whole hospitalization, approximately 2-5 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Pain Management830 dollars
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Pain Management807 dollars
Secondary

Post-operative Pain Scores

Postoperative pain is scored on a scale of 0 - 10, with the lower score showing a better outcome.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Post-operative Pain Scores4 score on a scale
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Post-operative Pain Scores3 score on a scale
Secondary

Surgical Time

Time from first incision to surgical site closure.

Time frame: Approximately 8 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Surgical Time4.5 hours
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Surgical Time4.4 hours
Secondary

Time to First Analgesic Request

Amount of time from leaving surgery to the first request for pain relief.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

Population: Analyses were based on treatment received, not randomization arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Time to First Analgesic Request20.1 minutes
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Time to First Analgesic Request25.0 minutes
Secondary

Total Cost of Care

All medical costs occurring during hospitalization.

Time frame: Entire hospitalization, approximately 2-5 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Total Cost of Care30109 dollars
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Total Cost of Care27776 dollars
Secondary

Use of Intravenous (IV) Patient-controlled Analgesia

Number of patients that used IV, patient controlled analgesia after surgery.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Use of Intravenous (IV) Patient-controlled Analgesia3 Participants
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Use of Intravenous (IV) Patient-controlled Analgesia5 Participants
Secondary

Use of Intravenous Rescue Opioids

Number of patients that needed IV rescue opioids after surgery.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Use of Intravenous Rescue Opioids42 Participants
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Use of Intravenous Rescue Opioids12 Participants
Secondary

Weight Gain Following Surgery

Weight difference post- and pre-surgery.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

Population: Data not collected

Other Pre-specified

Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Total Score

The Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire is a 15-item survey that patients rate to measure the quality of their recovery after surgery. Each item in the questionnaire is graded on an 11-point numeric rating scale with total scores ranging from 15 to 150. Higher scores indicate better recovery.

Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm I (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine)Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Total Score95.5 score on a scale
Arm II (Laparotomy, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Hydromorphone)Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Total Score104.0 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026