Skip to content

Manual Therapy, Kinesiotape and Strength Training in Soccer Players With Recurrent Ankle Sprains

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy, Kinesiotape and Strength Training in Improving the Range of Ankle Movement, Stability, Strength and Pain in Soccer Players With Recurrent Ankle Sprains

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04257916
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-02-06
Start date
2020-02-10
Completion date
2020-05-10
Last updated
2021-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Sprains

Keywords

Kinesiotape, Myofascial, Ankle sprain, Pain, Stability

Brief summary

Introduction. The ankle sprain is one of the most prevalent injuries in soccer players. The muscle strength deficit is one of the variables that can most influence the development of a sprain. It has been indicated how the Kinesiotape and the myofascial direct induction technique can improve functionality. Aim. To verify the effectiveness of the KinesioTape and the myofascial technique combined with strength training, in the reduction of pain, Rom increase, stability and strength in subjects who suffered ankle sprains. Study design. Randomized, multicentric clinical study with follow-up. Methods. A random assignment of the subjects recruited in two study groups will be carried out: experimental and control group. The treatment will last 4 weeks, with 2 weekly sessions, of 50-60 minutes. The intervention includes the application of kinesiotape and myofascial treatment with strength training. The study variables will be pain (VAS), mobility (goniometer), stability (ProKin balance) and strength (MicroFet). A descriptive statistical analysis will be carried out calculating the main statistical characteristics. By means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test the distribution of the normality of the sample will be assessed. With the t-student test for related samples we will calculate the difference of means between the evaluations made in both groups. With an ANOVA of repeated measures we will calculate the intra and intersubject effect. The calculation of the effect size will be done with the Cohen formula. Expected results. Improvement in stability, increase in range of motion, decrease in pain and increase in strength.

Interventions

OTHERExperimental

Myofascial technique intervention of the subastragalar joint, kinesiotape and eccentric training with isoinercial machine. The intervention lasted 4 weeks. Each treatment session lasted 50 minutes, with 2 sessions a week. Between training sessions, the indicated break was 48 hours.

Myofascial technique of the subastragalar joint and eccentric training with isoinercial machine. The intervention lasted 4 weeks. Each treatment session lasted 50 minutes, with 2 sessions a week. Between training sessions, the indicated break was 48 hours.

Sponsors

Investigación en Hemofilia y Fisioterapia
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male soccer players * 18 to 35 years old * History of ankle sprain recurrences

Exclusion criteria

* Players who suffered a sprain in the previous month * Footballers who were taking anti-inflammatory drugs * Players undergoing another type of physiotherapy treatment at the time of the study * Soccer players who do not sign the informed consent document.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline ankle range of motion after treatment and at 1 monthScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visitIt will be done with a digital goniometer (Get my Rom model - Iphone 5 - Interactive Medical Productions). The movements of dorsal and plantar flexion, inversion and eversion will be measured. In measuring dorsal and plantar flexion, the goniometer will be placed on the 5th metatarsal. In measuring the inversion and eversion, the goniometer will be placed in the plantar part in line with the metatarsals. The unit of measure is the degree.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline isometric ankle strength after treatment and at 1 monthScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visitA digital dynamometer (MicroFet®2 model - Hoggan Health Industries) will be used. To measure dorsal flexion, the instrument will be placed in the dorsal part of the foot in the region of the metatarsals, and for plantar flexion in the plantar part at the level of the metatarsals. In the eversion and abduction movements, the instrument will be placed in the lateral portion of the 5th metatarsal, while for inversion and adduction in the medial portion of the 1st metatarsal. Each movement will be repeated three times, one minute break.
Change from baseline stability after treatment and at 1 monthScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visitIt will be done with the PWalk instrument. The software will allow measurement for 30 seconds with eyes open and closed. This measuring instrument will allow to evaluate: the movement with respect to the center of pressure in the frontal plane and sagittal plane (measured in mm). The evaluation will be done in charge.
Change from baseline ankle joint pain perception after treatment and at 1 monthScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visitPain assessment will be assessed through the visual analogue scale (VAS). Anteroposterior and mediolateral movements will be performed. This scale is used using a scale of 0 to 10 points, where 0 indicates no pain and unstable, 10 indicates the maximum pain perceived.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026