Skip to content

Probiotic VSL#3 for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Associated to Fibromyalgia

Efficacy and Tolerability of the Probiotic VSL#3 for the Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia and Associated Gastrointestinal Symptomatology: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04256785
Enrollment
110
Registered
2020-02-05
Start date
2018-05-11
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2021-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia, Gastrointestinal Disease

Keywords

probiotic, efficacy, tolerability

Brief summary

The study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of probiotic VSL#3 for the treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia; 50% of the participants received probiotic and the remaining 50% received matching placebo in a double-blind, randomized design.The treatment was administered during a 12-week period and the participants were followed for an additional 12-week period in order to follow the evolution after treatment.

Detailed description

Many patients with fibromyalgia experience associated gastrointestinal symptomatology such as abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, meteorism, diarrhea and/or constipation. To date there is not any specific treatment for these symptoms that markedly impair the quality of life of these subjects. This trial intended to investigate if the addition of a polymicrobial probiotic product, which has shown efficacy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, was also be useful to ameliorate the gastrointestinal symptomatology of patients with fibromyalgia.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVSL#3

sachets containing probiotic

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

sachets containing placebo

Sponsors

Actial Farmaceutica S.r.l.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Elena Pita Calandre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosed of fibromyalagia * experiencing at least 3 chronic gastrointestinal symptoms * signed informed consent to participate * accept to not change previously prescribed treatment during study duration

Exclusion criteria

* mental illness excepting depression * severe organic disease * additional gastrointestinal disease excepting irritable bowel syndrome * pregnancy * breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Bloating and Metheorism Each One Measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scalebaseline and twelve weeks after treatmentVisual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Insomnia Severity Inventory (ISI)baseline and twelve weeks after treatmentThe ISI is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that measures the severity of sleep disturbances in a scale ranging from 0 to 28 points: higher scores indicate more severe sleep disturbance
Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)baseline and twelve weeks after treatmentPHQ-9 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that measures the severity of depression in a scale ranging from 0 to 27 points; higher scores indicate more severe depression. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)
Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 PCSbaseline and twelve weeks after treatmentThe SF-36 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire evaluating the general health quality in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; it evaluates 8 heath domains that yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better general health quality. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score).
Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 MCSbaseline and 12 weeks after treatmentThe SF-36 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire evaluating the general health quality in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; it evaluates 8 heath domains that yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better general health quality. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score).
Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR)baseline and twelve weeks after treatmentThe FIQR is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that evaluates the severity of fibromyalgia symptomatology in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; the higher the score, the worse the severity of the disease. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)
Change From Week 12 to Week 16 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study TreatmentWeek 12 to week 16Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 16 score - week 12 score)
Change From Week 12 to Week 20 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study TreatmentWeek 12 to week 20Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 20 score - week 12 score)
Change From Week 12 to Week 24 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study TreatmentWeek 12 to week 24Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 24 score - week 12 score)
Number of Patients Considered as Responders to TreatmentBaseline and 12 weeks after treatmentPatients that showed at least a a 30% reduction in the score of the primary variable, i.e. the composite ccore of abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and metheorism each one measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale, were considered as responders to treatment.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VSL#3
probiotic VSL#3, 2 sachets b.i.d for 3 months VSL#3: sachets containing probiotic
54
Placebo
matched placebo, 2 sachets b.i.d for 3 months Placebo: sachets containing placebo
56
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event86
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy34
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up77
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudySurgery or quarantined due to Covid-1957
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalVSL#3
Age, Continuous55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Fibromyalgia diagnosis - Fibromyalgia Score26.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
25.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
25.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
Fibromyalgia diagnosis - Symptom Severity Score9.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
9.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
9.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Fibromyalgia diagnosis - Widespread Pain Index (WPI) total score16.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
16.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
15.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants110 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants107 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Weight (Kg)71.2 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
72.2 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
73.3 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 5419 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Bloating and Metheorism Each One Measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale

Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Bloating and Metheorism Each One Measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale-6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
PlaceboChange, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Bloating and Metheorism Each One Measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale-5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 MCS

The SF-36 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire evaluating the general health quality in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; it evaluates 8 heath domains that yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better general health quality. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score).

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 MCS0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
PlaceboChange, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 MCS1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 PCS

The SF-36 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire evaluating the general health quality in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; it evaluates 8 heath domains that yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better general health quality. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score).

Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 PCS4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 PCS2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR)

The FIQR is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that evaluates the severity of fibromyalgia symptomatology in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; the higher the score, the worse the severity of the disease. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR)-7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
PlaceboChange, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR)-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Secondary

Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Insomnia Severity Inventory (ISI)

The ISI is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that measures the severity of sleep disturbances in a scale ranging from 0 to 28 points: higher scores indicate more severe sleep disturbance

Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Insomnia Severity Inventory (ISI)-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
PlaceboChange, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Insomnia Severity Inventory (ISI)-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Secondary

Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

PHQ-9 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that measures the severity of depression in a scale ranging from 0 to 27 points; higher scores indicate more severe depression. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
PlaceboChange, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Secondary

Change From Week 12 to Week 16 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment

Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 16 score - week 12 score)

Time frame: Week 12 to week 16

Population: Patients considered as responders to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change From Week 12 to Week 16 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
PlaceboChange From Week 12 to Week 16 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Secondary

Change From Week 12 to Week 20 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment

Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 20 score - week 12 score)

Time frame: Week 12 to week 20

Population: Patients considered as responders to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change From Week 12 to Week 20 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
PlaceboChange From Week 12 to Week 20 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Change From Week 12 to Week 24 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment

Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 24 score - week 12 score)

Time frame: Week 12 to week 24

Population: Patients considered as responders to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VSL#3Change From Week 12 to Week 24 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
PlaceboChange From Week 12 to Week 24 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Secondary

Number of Patients Considered as Responders to Treatment

Patients that showed at least a a 30% reduction in the score of the primary variable, i.e. the composite ccore of abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and metheorism each one measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale, were considered as responders to treatment.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after treatment

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all patients with at least a post-baseline evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VSL#3Number of Patients Considered as Responders to Treatment27 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Considered as Responders to Treatment22 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026