Advanced Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
resource-based, self-esteem, life review intervention
Brief summary
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial is conducted. The study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva at 3 outpatient units.
Detailed description
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on spiritual well-being, personal development, life satisfaction, and the perception of the interaction with the nurses. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).This monocentric study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG) at two outpatient units (planned n=102; 51 per group).
Interventions
BEHAVIORALRevie ⊕
Revie ⊕ is a positive approach centered on the resources and strengths of the patient, and it consists of an intervention that focuses on the individual's life review. Revie ⊕ allows specialist nurses to discuss life events with cancer patients, to identify the significant elements, and to explore how the diagnosis has changed their values and preferences. The intervention is geared toward working with the patient to discover their potential, to identify their strategies for coping with the events of their life, and to thereby accompany them in achieving a better understanding of themselves and what defines their identity. The intervention also allows their concerns surrounding death to be addressed, in addition to providing clarity in regard to the life projects. In the end, as a conclusion to the intervention, the patient is provided a booklet recounting the salient features of their life review along with photographs, quotes, or images.
Sponsors
Krebsforschung Schweiz, Bern, Switzerland
University Hospital, Geneva
School of Health Sciences Geneva
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adults 18 years with and advanced cancer, * whose general health status is adequate for participation in the study based on a clinical assessment by the nurse / doctor; and * who consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* documented cognitive impairment that compromises capacity for discernment, * command of French is insufficient for reading, writing, or conversing.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-esteem | Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months | Self-esteem will be measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE, 10 items) developed in 1965 (French version). Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 4. A score above 30 points corresponds to a high level of self-esteem, between 20 and 30 points indicates a moderate self-esteem, and a score of less than 20 points reflects a low self-esteem. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Personal development | Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months | Personal development will be measured by the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) instrument developed by Tedeschi and Calhoun in 1996 Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 6. A high score means a high level of development. |
| Spiritual well-being | Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months | Spiritual well-being will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp). Minimum value = 0 Maximum value = 4. The higher the score, the better the spiritual well-being. |
| Satisfaction with life | Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months | Satisfaction with life will be measured with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) instrument developed by Pavot and Diener in 1985. Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 7. A high score means a high level of satisfaction with life. |
| The patient's perception of their interaction with the nurse | Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months | The Nurse-Patient-Interaction Scale (NPIS) questionnaire developed by Haugan in 2012 will be used to evaluate the patient's perception of their interaction with the nurse Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 10. A high score means a great appreciation of interaction. |
Countries
Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed