Skip to content

RETHINK REFLUX Registry

Research to Further Inform Thinking About the Role of LINX for Reflux Disease

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04253392
Enrollment
500
Registered
2020-02-05
Start date
2020-07-08
Completion date
2032-07-31
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, GERD, Reflux, Regurgitation, Esophageal Disease, Lower Esophageal Sphincter, LES, Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation, MSA

Brief summary

The RETHINK REFLUX Registry is a post-market prospective, multi-center, observation, single arm, long-term safety surveillance registry of subjects implanted with the LINX device. The primary objective of the study is to confirm the long-term safety profile of the LINX device and procedure (implant/explant) up to 10 years post-implant.

Detailed description

The RETHINK REFLUX Registry or Research to further inform thinking about the role of LINX for Reflux Disease is sponsored by Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. This is a post-market prospective, multi-center, observational, single arm, long-term safety surveillance registry of subjects implanted with the LINX device. Up to 500 subjects will be enrolled and implanted at up to 50 centers in both the US and selected countries outside the US with regulatory approval for the LINX Reflux Management System. The study will collect data from patients 10 years post implant. The primary objective of the study is to confirm the long-term safety profile of the LINX device and procedure (implant/explant). Secondary objectives include Effectiveness, Health Economics and Health Utilization.

Interventions

The LINX Reflux Management System consists of a series of titanium beads each with a magnetic core connected with independent titanium wires to form an annular shape when implanted. The attractive force of the magnetic beads is designed to provide additional strength to keep a weak lower esophageal sphincter (LES) closed. During swallowing, the magnetic beads slide away from each other on the independent titanium wire "links" to allow esophageal distention as the bolus passes by.

Sponsors

Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is \>or=21 years old 2. Subject with prospective plans for a LINX procedure 3. Subject provides written informed consent 4. Subject must be willing and able to complete questionnaires/ surveys electronically (ePROs)

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject who was previously implanted with LINX device 2. Any reason which the Principal Investigator believes may cause the subject to be non-compliant with or unable to meet the protocol requirements (i.e. medical illness and/or limited life expectancy of less than 10 years) Note: Physicians should refer to the LINX Reflux Management System IFU for a complete list of contraindications, warnings, and precautions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety - Adverse Events10 yearsAdverse events related to the LINX device and/or procedure (implant/explant) limited to: * All related serious adverse events * All related adverse events of dysphagia and or odynophagia requiring treatment (only) * LINX migration * LINX erosion
Safety - Explant/Removal10 yearsLINX explant/removal
Safety - Hiatal Hernia Reoccurrence10 yearsHiatal hernia requiring repair (occurring after the LINX implant)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness10 yearsFollow-up questionnaires Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Esophageal Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), Foregut Symptoms Questionnaire (FSQ) and GERD Medication Survey\] will be collected and compared to baseline with evaluation to include: 1. Percentage of subjects reporting \>or=50% reduction in GERD-HRQL scores 2. Percentage of subjects reporting the following on the FSQ: * Elimination of moderate or severe regurgitation * Reduction in extra-esophageal symptoms * Maintain the ability to belch * Maintain the ability to vomit 3. Percentage of subjects reporting \> or = 50% reduction in average daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use
Health Economics - Work Productivity and Activity Impairment10 yearsMeasure of the impact of GERD on a subject's ability to work will be collected through the responses on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Percentages of impairment at baseline will be compared to scores collected annually. Four types of scores will be analyzed: * Absenteeism (work time missed) * Presenteeism (impairment of work/ reduced on-the-job effectiveness) * Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/ absenteeism plus presenteeism) * Activity impairment
Health Economics - GERD Treatment Decision-Making Process (Subject's Perspective)BaselineTo better understand a subject's process for making GERD related healthcare decisions and his/her care pathways, the LINX Interest Survey will be collected once at baseline, prior the implant procedure
Health Economics - Healthcare Utilization10 yearsAnalysis of healthcare economics in subjects who seek treatment for worsening of GERD symptoms and device/procedural complications over 10 years. A Healthcare Encounter Survey will be completed by subjects.

Countries

Austria, Germany, Italy, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJeffery Lowell, MD

Ethicon Endo-Surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026