Skip to content

Peri-neural Electrical Dry Needling Migraine Treatment Study

A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study to Determine the Effectiveness of Peri-Neural Electrical Dry Needling (PNED) vs. Standard Care for the Treatment of Patients With Migraine Headaches

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04252391
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-02-05
Start date
2020-02-18
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2022-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine Headache

Brief summary

This study seeks to determine the effectiveness of a specific treatment protocol using dry needling with perineural electrical stimulation in comparison to standard treatment in physical therapy for patients with migraine headaches. This will be a randomized cross-over study in which participants will be in the first arm of the study, have a washout period, then cross over to the other arm of the study.

Detailed description

From current understanding of migraine pathophysiology, the investigators know that it involves excitability of the trigeminovascular system. Intercranial vasculature containing nociceptor innervation consists of unmyelinated (c-fibers) and thinly myelinated (a-delta fibers ) axons which hold vasoactive neuropeptides including substance P and (CGRP) calcitonin gene related peptide. When a migraine occurs, there is a cortical spreading depolarization, which on a molecular level involves a release of ATP, glutamate, potassium, hydrogen ions, glia or vascular cells, and CGRP and nitric oxide by activated perivascular nerves. These substances, including CGRP diffuse to come in contact with nociceptors causing neurogenic inflammation (vasodilation), thus propagating a headache. Electrical perineural dry needling causes the release of substance-P and CGRG predominantly from non-neural structures, facilitating a negative feedback loop to neural and neuroactive components of the target tissue. This causes a lowering of the levels of CGRP which in turn decreases the inflammatory component thought to play a role in migraine headaches.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPerineural electrical dry needling

Standard care plus use of perineural electrical dry needling involving use of a monofilament needle of 15 or 30 mm length, 0.25 mm diameter will be placed utilizing the therapist's dominant hand following palpation of correct needle location. An electrical stimulation unit will be used to conduct an electrical impulse. The unit used will be an ES-130 by ITO (Japan) using a DC 9V battery producing an asymmetrical biphasic waveform. The unit has 6 available leads with alligator clamps, connecting to needle shafts. Parameters of PNED will include intensity set at a strong yet comfortable setting according to patient feedback. Treatment duration will be 15 minutes. Treatment frequency will be set to Medium at level 8 (80 Hz). Parameters will be set to elicit a sensory response.

PROCEDUREStandard Care

cervical or thoracic manipulation or mobilization, muscle stretching, muscle strengthening, electrical trigger point dry needling , soft tissue release and prescribed therapeutic exercises .

Sponsors

Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The participant will be masked to which treatment arm they are in. The outcome assessor will be masked to which treatment arm the participant was in.

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled cross-over study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women age 18 to 100 years old * Acute or chronic manifestation of migraine headaches or prior diagnosis of migraine headache. * Numeric pain rating of 3/10 (where 0= no pain and 10= worst pain)

Exclusion criteria

* History of epilepsy * Needle-phobia * Unstable psychological status * Compromised immune system * Metallic allergy * Having not eaten within the past 3 hours * Inability to lie in prone, or side-lying * Pregnant or trying to become pregnant * Inability to consent or understand English. * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in numeric pain rating scale1-6 daysSelf reported pain intensity immediately before and after treatment using a numeric pain rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain). Participants will be assessed 2 days per week with a minimum of 1 day between treatment days.
Change in Neck disability index scale1-6 daysA functional status scale ranging from 0% to 100% (0%= no activity limitation, 100% =complete activity limitation). Participants will be assessed immediately before and after treatment. Participants will be assessed 2 days per week with a minimum of 1 day between treatment days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trends with use of perineural electrical dry needling with or without CGRP antagonist drugs.following 4 weeks of treatment in the standard care plus perineural electrical dry needling arm.Because this is a small trial it is unlikely that we will be able to determine if migraine drugs significantly modify the effect perineural electrical dry needle treatment has on pain and the neck disability index. However we will look for any trends in interaction between perineural electrical dry needle treatment and migraine drugs using exploratory data analysis and box plot comparisons.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJackie Kirchen, MS, CIP
jackie.kirchen@ascension.org414-465-3134

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026