Skip to content

Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of K-321 in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) Following Descemetorhexis

A Double-Masked, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, 12 Week, Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of K-321 Eye Drops After Descemetorhexis in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04250207
Enrollment
65
Registered
2020-01-31
Start date
2020-06-23
Completion date
2022-06-27
Last updated
2024-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of K-321 in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) after descemetorhexis.

Interventions

DRUGK-321 Solution

K-321 solution drops

DRUGPlacebo Solution

Placebo solution drops for K-321

Sponsors

Kowa Research Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Is at least 18 years old at the screening visit (Visit 1). * Has a diagnosis of FECD at Visit 1. * Meet all other inclusion criteria outlined in clinical study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Has a study eye with a history of cataract surgery within 90 days of Visit 1. * Has a study eye with a history of any previous ocular surgery other than for cataract. * Meet any other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Central Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Week 12Baseline to Week 12Change in Central ECD at week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessBaseline to Week 52
Time to Achievement of no Corneal Oedema of Study EyeBaseline to Week 52
Proportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitBaseline to Week 52
Time to Achieve Central Corneal ECD 700 Cells/mm2 or MoreUp to 52 Weeks
Central Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitBaseline to Week 52
Proportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitBaseline to Week 52
Time to Return of Corneal Thickness to Less Than or Equal to Baseline Cornea ThicknessBaseline up to Week 52
Percent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitBaseline to Week 52
Number of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessBaseline up to 52 Weeks

Countries

Australia, Denmark, Germany, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After obtaining informed consent at Visit 1, the investigator selected one eye as the study eye, and the patient returned for the descemetorhexis operation and random assignment to treatment after 1 to 4 weeks (Visit 2). At Visit 2, eligibility for study participation was confirmed, which included the requirement of a successful descemetorhexis operation which met the inclusion criteria. After eligibility was confirmed, patients were randomly assigned to the 3 treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
K-321 QID
K-321 ophthalmic solution 4 times daily for 12 Weeks (Morning, Mid-day, Evening, Night).
21
K-321 BID
K-321 ophthalmic solution twice daily for 12 Weeks. (Morning: K-321, Mid-day: Placebo, Evening: Placebo, Night: K-321)
22
Placebo
Placebo ophthalmic solution four times daily for 12 Weeks. (Morning, Mid-day, Evening, Night)
22
Total65

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicK-321 QIDK-321 BIDPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous64.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28
65.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
65.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
65.03 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.23
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants21 Participants20 Participants57 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants19 Participants20 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants13 Participants20 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants9 Participants2 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 220 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 2111 / 2214 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 211 / 223 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Central Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Week 12

Change in Central ECD at week 12

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Week 12530.86 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 312.453
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Week 12468.02 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 322.361
PlaceboCentral Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Week 12228.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 297.86
p-value: 0.0065Other (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test)
p-value: 0.0344Other (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test)
Secondary

Central Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent Visit

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The number of participants analyzed for the outcome measure may differ from the overall number of participants in each group. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors, including:~* Missing data: Some participants may have incomplete data due to factors such as missed visits, early withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.~* Optional visits: Week 2 was an optional visit and saw a smaller number of participants contributing data to specific outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 38722.23 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 331.954
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 16540.52 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 311.004
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 7303.14 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 294.919
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20.00 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 0
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 12530.86 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 312.453
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 9370.71 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 338.393
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitBaseline440.01 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 774.3
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 10.00 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 0
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 24668.22 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 313.783
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 3131.98 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 171.648
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 52751.45 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 407.259
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20655.20 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 260.268
K-321 QIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 5167.36 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 176.049
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 9340.76 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 310.264
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitBaseline319.06 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 593.294
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 10.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 0.218
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 0.218
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 331.90 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 102.749
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 5167.94 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 218.321
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 7302.95 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 232.956
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 12468.02 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 322.361
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 16499.77 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 358.411
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20518.50 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 296.094
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 24541.02 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 328.131
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 38529.65 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 303.691
K-321 BIDCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 52633.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 313.372
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 16286.75 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 350.269
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 327.49 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 127.828
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 38391.10 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 316.339
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20347.21 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 313.93
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 0.213
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitBaseline254.27 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 468.027
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 24386.83 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 353.84
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 9156.04 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 278.455
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 779.38 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 215.197
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 10.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 0.213
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 12228.05 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 297.86
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 5104.54 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 218.264
PlaceboCentral Corneal ECD From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 52431.79 cells/mm2Standard Deviation 327.488
Comparison: Baselinep-value: 0.3587Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Baselinep-value: 0.5724Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.3703Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 1p-value: >0.9999Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.3703Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 2p-value: >0.9999Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0257Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
p-value: 0.7263Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.0607Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.046Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0111Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0011Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.02Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0476Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0065Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0344Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.025Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.0733Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.0072Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.1124Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0199Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.2331Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.0024Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.1672Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.0047Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.0625Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The number of participants analyzed for the outcome measure may differ from the overall number of participants in each group. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors, including:~* Missing data: Some participants may have incomplete data due to factors such as missed visits, early withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.~* Optional visits: Week 2 was an optional visit and saw a smaller number of participants contributing data to specific outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 1265.57 μmStandard Deviation 125.944
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2237.54 μmStandard Deviation 94.157
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 396.73 μmStandard Deviation 134.36
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 552.71 μmStandard Deviation 109.696
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 742.24 μmStandard Deviation 114.048
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 910.36 μmStandard Deviation 98.235
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 120.59 μmStandard Deviation 86.332
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 162.40 μmStandard Deviation 67.68
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2016.99 μmStandard Deviation 90.44
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2410.60 μmStandard Deviation 78.376
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 38-12.32 μmStandard Deviation 66.319
K-321 QIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 52-6.74 μmStandard Deviation 65.888
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 52-25.88 μmStandard Deviation 44.36
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 1250.30 μmStandard Deviation 90.448
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 12-22.69 μmStandard Deviation 61.127
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 20-17.70 μmStandard Deviation 46.593
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2249.14 μmStandard Deviation 90.636
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 9-14.23 μmStandard Deviation 60.223
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 38-21.40 μmStandard Deviation 42.525
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 3132.63 μmStandard Deviation 152.92
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 16-9.71 μmStandard Deviation 50.918
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 72.37 μmStandard Deviation 98.34
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 532.31 μmStandard Deviation 110.784
K-321 BIDChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 24-27.80 μmStandard Deviation 42.954
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 5159.95 μmStandard Deviation 128.295
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 7134.83 μmStandard Deviation 132.811
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2468.17 μmStandard Deviation 147.116
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 9116.77 μmStandard Deviation 141.046
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 12100.19 μmStandard Deviation 137.191
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 1670.00 μmStandard Deviation 132.908
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 3863.09 μmStandard Deviation 149.562
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 1319.33 μmStandard Deviation 130.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2315.18 μmStandard Deviation 131.996
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 2070.52 μmStandard Deviation 139.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 3201.68 μmStandard Deviation 126.387
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal ThicknessWeek 5255.29 μmStandard Deviation 155.649
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.2434Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.2126Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.079Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.3043Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0357Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0803Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.015Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.0012Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0314Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0019Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.017Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0021Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0127Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0014Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.0677Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.0243Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.1867Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.025Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.3213Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0298Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.1449Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.0947Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.5181Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.1898Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal Thickness

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 Weeks

Population: The number of participants analyzed for the outcome measure may differ from the overall number of participants in each group. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors, including:~* Missing data: Some participants may have incomplete data due to factors such as missed visits, early withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.~* Optional visits: Week 2 was an optional visit and saw a smaller number of participants contributing data to specific outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 10 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 20 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 35 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 58 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 711 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 911 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 1213 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 1614 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 2012 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 2413 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 3815 Participants
K-321 QIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 5214 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 5215 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 10 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 1217 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 2014 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 20 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 916 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 3816 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 33 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 1613 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 713 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 59 Participants
K-321 BIDNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 2417 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 52 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 73 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 249 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 95 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 125 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 166 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 3810 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 208 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Thickness Less Than or Equal to Baseline Corneal ThicknessWeek 5213 Participants
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0915Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.3282Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.0648Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.031Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0187Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0036Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0687Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0016Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0218Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0013Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.0348Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.1028Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.8677Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.4401Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.5926Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0732Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.2497Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.2453Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 52p-value: >0.9999Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 52p-value: >0.9999Chi-square or Fisher exact
Secondary

Percent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent Visit

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The number of participants analyzed for the outcome measure may differ from the overall number of participants in each group. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors, including:~* Missing data: Some participants may have incomplete data due to factors such as missed visits, early withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.~* Optional visits: Week 2 was an optional visit and saw a smaller number of participants contributing data to specific outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 145.76 PercentStandard Deviation 23.191
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 239.03 PercentStandard Deviation 10.916
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 316.50 PercentStandard Deviation 22.581
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 59.24 PercentStandard Deviation 19.101
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 77.58 PercentStandard Deviation 19.744
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 92.51 PercentStandard Deviation 18.451
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 120.73 PercentStandard Deviation 15.895
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 160.74 PercentStandard Deviation 11.936
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 203.85 PercentStandard Deviation 17.227
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 242.27 PercentStandard Deviation 14.662
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 38-3.63 PercentStandard Deviation 7.992
K-321 QIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 52-2.90 PercentStandard Deviation 8.634
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 52-5.63 PercentStandard Deviation 5.614
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 141.48 PercentStandard Deviation 15.582
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 12-3.65 PercentStandard Deviation 9.467
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 20-3.64 PercentStandard Deviation 6.726
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 236.77 Percent
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 9-2.28 PercentStandard Deviation 9.442
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 38-4.98 PercentStandard Deviation 5.229
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 321.85 PercentStandard Deviation 25.6
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 16-1.65 PercentStandard Deviation 7.955
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 70.43 PercentStandard Deviation 15.276
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 55.31 PercentStandard Deviation 17.421
K-321 BIDPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 24-5.42 PercentStandard Deviation 5.927
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 525.67 PercentStandard Deviation 21.873
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 720.84 PercentStandard Deviation 22.228
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 242.79 PercentStandard Deviation 16.807
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 914.55 PercentStandard Deviation 18.954
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 1210.70 PercentStandard Deviation 17.611
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 162.91 PercentStandard Deviation 11.967
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 38-2.00 PercentStandard Deviation 9.969
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 151.41 PercentStandard Deviation 21.687
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 240.97 Percent
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 201.93 PercentStandard Deviation 14.291
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 332.39 PercentStandard Deviation 20.422
PlaceboPercent Change of Central Corneal Thickness From Baseline to Each Subsequent VisitWeek 52-3.68 PercentStandard Deviation 11.182
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.4435Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 1p-value: 0.3402Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 2p-value: >0.9999Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0655Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0903Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.0216Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0676Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0029Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0335Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0053Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0608Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0071Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.4406Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.1716Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.9856Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.2229Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.8817Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
p-value: 0.2081Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.7335Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.5367Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.555Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.8718Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each Visit

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The number of participants analyzed for the outcome measure may differ from the overall number of participants in each group. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors, including:~* Missing data: Some participants may have incomplete data due to factors such as missed visits, early withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.~* Optional visits: Week 2 was an optional visit and saw a smaller number of participants contributing data to specific outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 10 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 20 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 30 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 50 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 73 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 93 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 126 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 166 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 209 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 2410 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 3812 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 5215 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 528 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 10 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 124 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 207 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 20 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 92 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 385 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 30 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 167 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 70 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 50 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 248 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 51 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 71 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 246 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 92 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 122 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 163 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 383 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 10 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 20 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 203 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 30 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieved Central Corneal ECD of 700 Cells/mm2 or More at Each VisitWeek 525 Participants
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.4872Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.4634Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.605Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.4762Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 9p-value: >0.9999Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 9p-value: >0.9999Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.4227Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.6796Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.4642Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.4645Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.2744Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.7026Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.7817Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.9285Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.0135Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.6992Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.0135Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.5154Chi-square or Fisher exact
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by Visit

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 10 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 20 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 38 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 511 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 711 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 914 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 1217 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 1616 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 2015 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 2417 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 3817 Participants
K-321 QIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 5217 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 5213 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 10 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 1212 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 2012 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 20 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 912 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 3813 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 30 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 1613 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 712 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 54 Participants
K-321 BIDProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 2413 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 51 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 72 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 248 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 92 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 122 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 162 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 3810 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 10 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 20 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 207 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 31 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Who Achieve No Corneal Oedema of Study Eye by VisitWeek 5213 Participants
Comparison: Week 3p-value: 0.0093Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 3p-value: >0.9999Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.0006Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 5p-value: 0.3449Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0028Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 7p-value: 0.0028Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0001Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 9p-value: 0.0028Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.0001Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0028Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 16p-value: <0.0001Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.0011Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.0094Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 20p-value: 0.1281Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0051Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.1313Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.0268Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 38p-value: 0.3652Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.1854Chi-square or Fisher exact
Comparison: Week 52p-value: >0.9999Chi-square or Fisher exact
Secondary

Time to Achieve Central Corneal ECD 700 Cells/mm2 or More

Time frame: Up to 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-321 QIDTime to Achieve Central Corneal ECD 700 Cells/mm2 or More141.0 Days
K-321 BIDTime to Achieve Central Corneal ECD 700 Cells/mm2 or More181.0 Days
PlaceboTime to Achieve Central Corneal ECD 700 Cells/mm2 or More273.0 Days
p-value: 0.1209Log Rank
p-value: 0.7116Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Achievement of no Corneal Oedema of Study Eye

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Proportions of patients from the FAS who achieved no corneal edema of the study eye

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-321 QIDTime to Achievement of no Corneal Oedema of Study Eye35.0 Days
K-321 BIDTime to Achievement of no Corneal Oedema of Study Eye51.5 Days
PlaceboTime to Achievement of no Corneal Oedema of Study Eye267.0 Days
p-value: 0.0021Log Rank
p-value: 0.1696Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Return of Corneal Thickness to Less Than or Equal to Baseline Cornea Thickness

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-321 QIDTime to Return of Corneal Thickness to Less Than or Equal to Baseline Cornea Thickness50 Days
K-321 BIDTime to Return of Corneal Thickness to Less Than or Equal to Baseline Cornea Thickness50.0 Days
PlaceboTime to Return of Corneal Thickness to Less Than or Equal to Baseline Cornea Thickness165.0 Days
p-value: 0.0259Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
p-value: 0.0068Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026