Skip to content

High Power vs Standard Power RF Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Conscious Patients

HPvSP-AF Trail: Is High RF Energy Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Fast, Safe, Less Painful and Effective - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 30/25W, 40W and 50W RF Energy Settings

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04250181
Acronym
HPvSP-AF
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-01-31
Start date
2019-11-15
Completion date
2020-02-08
Last updated
2020-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation ablation, high power radiofrequency ablation

Brief summary

High RF energy ablation of atrial fibrillation is fast, safe, less painful and effective procedure.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is the most commonly performed radiofrequency (RF) ablation and is usually associated with a long procedural time and sensation of pain in conscious patients. Prolonged radiation exposure during the procedure puts the patient and the operator at risk of malignancy and genetic abnormalities. Complications such as asymptomatic cerebral lesions, tamponade, perforation, and also arrhythmia recurrence were associated with longer ablation time. High-power, shorter-duration radiofrequency ablation (HPSDRFA) appears to be a novel concept for atrial fibrillation (AF) but there are scarce data in conscious patients. The lesion side index (LSI) value has been associated with durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) lesions. We hypothesised that HPSDRFA applications based on the lesion side index (LSI; its has been associated with durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) lesions) which were not inferior to standard approach regarding safety and effectiveness with shorten procedure time and being less painful for a patient.

Interventions

OTHERRF ablation of atrial fibrillation

Comparison of standard, 40W and 50W RF energy setting for ablation of atrial fibrillation

Sponsors

Medical University of Lublin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* symptomatic patients with non-valvular AF, * aged:18-85, first procedure in left atrium, * exclusion of thrombus in left atrium and left atrium appendage, * left ventricle ejection fraction \>55%

Exclusion criteria

* age below 18 or above 85 years, * left ventricle ejection fraction\<55%, * previous procedure in left atrium, * valvular AF

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure time:procedureTotal procedure time (needle to needle time).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Voltage mapping timeproceduretime needed to perform 3D electroanatomical map and high density voltage mapping of left atrium.
Total RF timeproceduretime of all performed radiofrequency (RF) applications
Total number of RF applicationsprocedurenumber of all RF applications performed during a procedure
Left atrial dwelling timetranseptal access to removal of a catheter and a sheathtime of left atrium instrumentation
Complications12 monthsboth procedure-related complications and all complications in 12 moths follow-up as follows: Cardiac tamponade/perforation \[yes/no\], Stroke/TIA (Transient ischemic attack) \[yes/no\], Oesophageal injury (perforation/fistula) \[yes/no\], Death (procedural related, one year follow up) \[yes/no\], Stem pops \[yes/no\], Catheter char \[yes/no\], Phrenic nerve paralysis \[yes/no\], PV stenosis requiring intervention \[yes/no\], Gastrointestinal bleeding or gastrointestinal complaints \[yes/no\], Need for periprocedural pacemaker implantation \[yes/no\], Vascular access complication which required intervention \[yes/no\], Vascular access complication which not required intervention \[yes/no\],
Number of stopped RF applications as a result of pain complained by a patientprocedurethe surrogate for assessment of the painfulness of the procedure
Follow-up-30sprocedureabsence any arrhythmia recurrence (AR) defined as any documented recurrence of AF and/or atrial tachycardia (AT) and /or atrial flutter (AFL) lasting longer than 30 second
X-Ray timeprocedurethe total time of fluoroscopy

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026