Skip to content

Pulp Protection in Selective Carious Tissue Removal

Effect of Pulp Protection After Selective Carious Tissue Removal in Permanent Teeth, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04250142
Acronym
PULPROTECT
Enrollment
142
Registered
2020-01-31
Start date
2019-03-13
Completion date
2022-03-18
Last updated
2022-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

Dental caries, Selective Caries Removal, Self-etching adhesive, Composite Resin, Glass ionomer, Cavity lining, Minimally invasive dentistry, Deep caries lesions

Brief summary

Although selective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin (SRCT-S) has been proposed as the standard of care for the management of deep dentin caries, it is unclear whether a cavity liner is necessary. This double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial aims to analyze the behavior of a resin restoration performed after SRCT-S for deep dentin caries, treated either with a Glass Ionomer or only with a Self-Etching Adhesive, in permanent teeth. The study will include 142 restorations allocated to either experimental arm. After 12 and 24 months, restoration survival, pulp response and radiographic lesion progression will be assessed.

Detailed description

Introduction: Minimally invasive dentistry has been proposed as an conceptual framework for the conservative management of caries lesions. This approach allows reducing potential adverse effects derived from the conventional treatment, including the loss of pulp vitality. Complete removal carious tissues compromising deep dentin significantly increases the risk of pulp exposure and post-operative symptoms, leading in many cases, to the need for endodontic treatment, with the subsequent high costs and low coverage for the population. In this context, a new technique for the management of deep caries lesions has been introduced called selective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin (SRCT-S), which partially removes only the outer layer of the affected tissue, leaving carious tissue in the pulpal wall, but not on the lateral walls of the operatory cavity. This procedure has been reported in several studies, with lower clinical time, cheaper cost and lower discomfort for the patient. The SRCT-S aims to preserve pulp vitality, prevent access of nutrients to carious tissue, stopping the caries process and preserving a greater amount of dental structure. Although the SRCT-S technique has proven effective compared to conventional treatments, it is unclear and with insufficient evidence about how to manage the remaining carious tissue and whether a cavity lining agent is needed. This decision may have important clinical implications, but there is no general consensus, strongly suggesting further research. Objective: To analyze the behavior of a resin restoration performed after SRCT-S for deep dentin caries, treated either with a Glass Ionomer or only with a Self-Etching Adhesive, in permanent teeth. Methodology: A double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial was devised. Trained dentists will treat the 142 restorations included in deep dentin carious lesions of permanent molars, at the dental clinics of the University of Talca. After recruiting, patients will be randomly assigned to the experimental groups: Group 1: (n=71) no cavity lining, treating carious tissue with self-conditioning adhesive followed by composite resin restoration and Group 2: (n=71) remaining carious tissue covered with a conventional glass ionomer followed by composite resin restoration. The dependent variables (outcomes) will be; a. clinical: restoration survival and pulp response and b. radiographic: lesion progression. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be monitored annually at 12 and 24 months. The analysis of the restorations and the pulp response will be performed with Weibull regression. The Friedman test will be applied for the analysis of the data regarding radiographic subtraction, (p≤0.05). Given the lack of studies on the subject with longitudinal evaluations, this project is expected to contribute relevant evidence that impacts the generation of novel guidelines for the management of deep dentin caries. Additionally, the results will contribute evidence to increase the support to a more conservative clinical behavior.

Interventions

DEVICESelf-etching Adhesive

A Self-etching adhesive will be used to cover deep carious dentin after a selective removal of caries lesion to soft dentin procedure.

A conventional glass ionomer will be used to cover deep carious dentin after a selective removal of caries lesion to soft dentin procedure.

Sponsors

University of Talca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Subjects will not know the type of treatment they will receive. The data analysis will be carried out assigning a letter to the treatment arms, and the identity of the arms will not be revealed up until the end of the analysis.

Intervention model description

A double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a permanent molar or premolar with a deep caries lesion that compromises from the inner half of the dentin (determined by radiographic examination). * Tooth restorable by a direct resin restoration. * Absence of pulp sensibility verified by cold test * Absence of a history of spontaneous pain or vertical and horizontal percussion. * Absence of periapical lesion, verified through periapical radiographs. * Primary injury.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic conditions with poor control or uncompensated. * Cervical margin of the cavity in dentin or root cement. * Tooth already restored or with secondary caries.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Restoration integrity2 yearsThe FDI Criteria will be used for the direct clinical evaluation of restorations.
Pulp vitality2 yearsPulp vitality will be evaluated by means of symptoms reported by the patient, normal response upon thermal tests, no pain upon percussion, absence of periapical lesions (periapical radiography) and absence of infectious processes such as fistula.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic progression2 yearsLesion progression at the x-ray will be monitored through qualitative analysis with the technique of digital subtraction of the radiographic images (radiolucent area under restorations) over time.
Changes in pulp chamber morphology2 yearsFor the qualitative analysis of the depth of the lesion and the deposition of tertiary dentin, the pairs of radiographic images (baseline radiographs versus control radiographs) will be assessed and compared.

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026