Skip to content

Clinic to Community© Program for Adults With Epilepsy Admitted to Emergency Departments

Clinic to Community© Program for Adults With Epilepsy Admitted to Emergency Departments: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04248920
Acronym
C2CEDRCT
Enrollment
9
Registered
2020-01-30
Start date
2022-09-12
Completion date
2023-12-11
Last updated
2024-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy, Generalized

Keywords

Health Care Utilization, Emergency Department

Brief summary

Analysis of emergency department (ED) visits with a billing code for 'epilepsy' or 'seizure' found up to 37% are eligible for deferral. This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Clinic To Community© program (C2C) as an intervention for adults with epilepsy visiting emergency departments at a mid size hospital in Ontario, Canada. Participants in the intervention arm receive patient education to improve knowledge of epilepsy and access to community-based services. Participants in the control group are wait-listed and receive patient education 12 months later. The study objective is to successfully implement, recruit and retain participants for this intervention and evaluate whether C2C will reduce the frequency of ED visits, reduce felt stigma and improve quality of life, epilepsy knowledge, and self-management skills.

Detailed description

Emergency care for epilepsy can be appropriate and even life-saving, but up to 37% of emergency department (ED) visits by persons with epilepsy (PWE) are potentially deferrable, resulting from persons with known epilepsy and uncomplicated seizures. Past studies have shown that low self-management confidence among PWE leads to frequent emergency visits to the hospital. Other factors associated with increased use of EDs are increased seizure frequency, reduced medication, sub-optimal self-management, increased anxiety, increased depression, increased felt-stigma, and lower social and medical epilepsy knowledge. In one catchment area in Ontario, Canada, the Southwest Local Health Integration Network (LHIN), there are an estimated 7508 prevalent cases of epilepsy associated with the use of approximately $55 million/year of provincial healthcare services. In addition, there are an estimated 433 incident cases costing an additional $4.6 million/year. Hospital care (including ED visits) accounts for 35.5% of the total cost equating to $21 million/year. Eliminating the 37% of deferrable ED visits equates to saving almost $8 million/year. The Clinic to Community© (C2C) epilepsy education program has been developed using best practices for patient education. The content has been divided into an introductory 60 minute face-to-face session supported by strategy sheets that can be accessed online at www.clinictocommunity.ca The Clinic To Community© program recognizes that epilepsy is unique among chronic conditions in that PWE lose their ability to make choices during a seizure and depend on the decisions of others including family, friends and colleagues to keep them safe. Many patients seek care in the ED to reduce their anxiety and for reassurance and that upon discharge from the ED, the inability to receive a prompt specialist appointment leads to the continued use of ED for these same patients. This is a parallel, pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the Clinic To Community© program plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) with TAU only (i.e. wait-list control). This study will not interfere with patients' clinical care. Eligible patients visiting a participating ED will be given information about the study and if they agree, will be referred. The C2C program will be delivered in-person, one-on-one for 60 minutes by appointment on a rolling basis to minimize wait-times and allow timely access to the intervention. All participants will complete questionnaires before randomization and 12 months after randomization.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALClinic to Community Education Program

The C2C program aims to improve participants' knowledge of epilepsy and access to services and to provide support. Participants randomized to the intervention group will complete the C2C program. They will receive an in-person one-on-one 60-minute education session and will be introduced to, and encouraged to participate in, the programs and support services that are provided by Epilepsy Southwestern Ontario (ESWO).

Sponsors

Ontario Brain Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not feasible for participants and study personnel to be blinded. However, the letter of information (LOI) indicates that the study aims to evaluate outcomes after an ED visit, and, in addition, evaluate the impact of a community engagement program.

Intervention model description

This is a parallel, pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the Clinic To Community© program plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) with TAU only (i.e. wait-list control).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults (aged ≥18 years) visiting a participating ED for a seizure or an epilepsy-related concern. 2. Adults on anti-seizure medication prior to coming to the ED or prescribed anti-seizure medication at the ED. 3. Providing informed consent and having sufficient English language skills to complete questionnaires and participate in the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous participation in the C2C program. 2. Known diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of engagement with the Clinic To Community© (C2C) programThroughout study completion, approximately 2 yearsEvaluated by rate of ED referrals, rate of recruitment, rate of retention, and proportion who receive support education.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of epilepsy-related emergency department (ED) visits over the next 12 monthsBaseline (0), and 12 monthsChange from baseline in frequency of ED visits and health care utilization, adapted from the Canadian Community Health Survey
Effect of participation in C2C on felt stigma using Stigma Scale of EpilepsyBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline in using the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy, 3-item scale asking: Because of epilepsy, (1) other people are uncomfortable with me; (2) treat me as inferior; (3) prefer to avoid me. Each of those questions is scored on a four-point scale: 0 not at all; 1 yes, maybe; 2 yes, probably; 3 yes, definitely. Total scores range from 0 to 9 and categorized as not stigmatized (score of 0), mild-moderate (1-6) and highly stigmatized (7-9).
Effect of participation in C2C on felt stigma using Epilepsy Stigma ScaleBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by Epilepsy Stigma Scale, a 10-item measure evaluating stigma. Items are measured on a 7-point Likert Scale, from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Effect of participation in C2C on self-management skillsBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by the Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI-65) This measure is a 65-item scale assessing the frequency of use of epilepsy self-management practises. Contains seven domains: 1) healthcare communication, 2) treatment management, 3) coping, 4) social support, 5) seizure tracking, 6) wellness, and 7) seizure response.
Effect of participation in C2C on quality of lifeBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE 10), a 10-item scaled evaluating quality of life in adults with epilepsy. Responses range from all of the time to none of the time
Effect of participation in C2C on epilepsy knowledgeBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline on the Thinking About Epilepsy Questionnaire knowledge subscale. Knowledge is assessed by answering true/false/I don't know

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect on quality of life using World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)Baseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) - Abbreviated (BREF), 30-item measure of quality of life, generic-HRQOL instrument.
Effect on activities of daily living using Sheehan Disability ScaleBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale is 5-items for patient-rated measure of disability and impairment.
Effect on anxiety using Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scaleBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, 7-item scale evaluating generalized anxiety. Generates an overall anxiety score, with scores above 10 indicative of moderate-severe anxiety.
Effect on depressive symptoms based on Quick Inventory of Depressive SymptomatologyBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, 14-item scale evaluating depressive symptoms.
Effect on sleep quality using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (25-items)Baseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, 25-item scale evaluating sleep quality.
Effect on suicide ideation using Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScreenerBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by the C-SSRS Screener, a 6-item scale evaluating suicidal ideation.
Effect on Psychiatric comorbidities using Brief Symptom InventoryBaseline (0) and 12 monthsChange from baseline measured by 53-items covering nine symptom dimensions: Somatization, Obsession-Compulsion, Interpersonal Sensitivity, Depression, Anxiety, Hostility, Phobic anxiety, Paranoid ideation and Psychoticism; and three global indices of distress: Global Severity Index, Positive Symptom Distress Index, and Positive Symptom Total. The global indices measure current or past level of symptomatology, intensity of symptoms, and number of reported symptoms, respectively

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026