Skip to content

Quantitative MRI for Functional Assessment Following SBRT for Spinal Metastases

Quantitative MR Imaging Methods for Functional Assessment Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04248543
Enrollment
25
Registered
2020-01-30
Start date
2020-12-22
Completion date
2025-07-02
Last updated
2025-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Metastases

Keywords

Vertebral compression fracture, Radiation induced myelopathy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) can objectively measure changes in the tumor/vertebral body and adjacent spinal cord following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for painful metastatic spine disease.

Detailed description

Metastatic spine disease (MSD) can result in considerable morbidity from pain, spinal cord compromise and neurologic disability. Recent developments in image-guidance and immobilization have enabled more accurate target localization, which allows methods of precise high-dose radiation delivery such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT carries potential risks of radiation induced myelopathy (RIM) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality that may be able to detect radiation-induced damage in the vertebral body or spinal cord following SBRT. Quantitative MR-based imaging methods may also help to quantify treatment response and help predict subsequent outcomes such as tumor control and VCF risk.

Interventions

DEVICEqMRI with Gadoteridol contrast agent

quantitative MR: MRI uses a magnet and radio waves to make medical images of the body. Gadoteridol is used as a contrast agent. Quantitative MRI involves the use of software to analyze the acquired images.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of metastatic cancer with a vertebral body metastasis or contiguous vertebral body metastases for which SBRT is appropriate * Age ≥ 18 years of age * KPS ≥ 70 * Life expectancy of at least 3 months * No contraindication to undergoing MR imaging * Women of childbearing age must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test to meet eligibility per Duke Policy * Pre-treatment pain score of at least 1/10 based on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) * Disease located from C1 to S5 * Subjects with prior radiation to the involved vertebral body are allowed.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects unable to undergo MRI (includes non-MRI compatible material or devices and severe claustrophobia) * Subjects with prior procedural intervention to the involved vertebral body that would result in artifact (kyphoplasty, screw and/or rod placement); minimally invasive surgery without instrumentation of the involved vertebral body and instrumentation immediately above or below the index lesion is allowed. * Subjects with spinal cord compression; minimally invasive separation surgery to first resect the epidural component is allowed * Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Allergy to standard IV contrast agents used in MRI * Subjects with eGFR \<30 30 mL/min2 or on dialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Relative Change in Sequence specific parameters for Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)baseline, 4 wks
Relative Change in Sequence specific parameters for Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)baseline, 4 wks
Relative Change in Sequence specific parameters for Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRIbaseline, 4 wks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in numeric pain score as measured by the EQ5D Pain Questionnairebaseline, 4 wksMeasured from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain
Change in quality of life as measured by the Pat Sf36 V2 assessmentbaseline, 4 wksPat SF36 V2 is a quality of life survey about physical activity, general health and daily functions measured from excellent/much better/yes, limited a lot/all of the time/not at all, through poor/much worse/no,not limited at all/none of the time/extremely with additional not answered option
Change in opioid usebaseline, 4 wks
Change in quality of life as measured by the SOSG+ assessmentbaseline, 4 wksQuestionnaire about physical function, neurological function and pain ranging from never/not at all through always/very much
Change in quality of life as measured by the PROMIS assessmentbaseline, 4 wksPROMIS categories include physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep and pain ranging from never/not at all through always/very much.
Change in numeric pain score as measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scalebaseline, 4 wksMeasured from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain
Change in numeric pain score as measured by the Brief Pain Inventorybaseline, 4 wksMeasured from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026