Skip to content

Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Coronary Haemodynamics and Instantaneous Effect of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

Impact of Mitral Valve Regurgitation on Coronary Haemodynamics and the Instantaneous Effect of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: The MitraFLOW Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04245956
Acronym
MitraFLOW
Enrollment
1
Registered
2020-01-29
Start date
2020-01-08
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Keywords

Mitral Regurgitation, MitraClip, iFR, Coronary microcirculation, Coronary hemodynamics

Brief summary

In the present study, the investigators aim to use the in-vivo Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR) model to determine how Mitral Regurgitation (MR) affects coronary hemodynamics in patients affected with severe MR and concomittant angiographically-documented coronary artery disease. The investigators will also provide unique physiologic data on the acute effect of TMVR using the MitraClip system on coronary microcirculation in patients with severe MR.

Detailed description

Consecutive patients with significant degenerative or functional MR planned for TMVR using the percutaneous edge-to-edge MitraClip system will be assessed for study eligibility. Patients with documented concomitant coronary artery disease, defined as coronary artery stenosis of 50% diameter or more in at least 1 epicardial coronary artery, will be informed about the study. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before enrolment in the study. The TMVR procedure will be performed under general anesthesia with fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiographic guidance using the MitraClip device via a femoral venous approach. Cardiac catheterisation and coronary angiography will be undertaken via the transradial route, using standard equipment. The hemodynamic data listed below will be acquired immediately before and after TMVR. For all lesions, intracoronary blood flow and pressure measurements will be used to generate the following intracoronary physiological parameters: * Fractional Flow Reserve, FFR. * Absolute coronary Blood Flow, ABF. * Coronary Flow Reserve, CFR. * Index for Microvascular Resistance, IMR. * Baseline Resistance Index, BRI. * Resistance Reserve Ratio, RRR. * Instantaneous wave-free ratio, iFR Post-procedural evaluation: Patients will be followed up according to local standard clinical practice.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMeasure of hemodynamic indices in a stenosed coronary artery using a pressure wire

The intervention consists of measuring a series of hemodynamic indices in a stenosed coronary using a pressure wire, immediately before and after transcatheter mitral valve repair using the percutaneous edge-to-edge MitraClip system in patients with severe mitral insufficiency and concomitant intermediate coronary artery stenosis.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

MitraFLOW is a prospective, investigator-initiated, monocentric, open-label, non-randomized pilot study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years; 2. Patients with significant degenerative or functional MR planned for TMVR with the percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair MitraClip system; 3. Patients with ≥ 1 coronary artery lesion with angiographically-documented ≥50% diameter stenosis, 4. Patient willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous coronary artery bypass surgery; 2. Presence of ≥1 coronary total occlusion(s); 3. Documented non-viable myocardium in the area of the corresponding coronary artery being studied; 4. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (\<30%); 5. Cardiogenic shock/hemodynamic instability at the time of intervention (heart rate\<50 beats per minute, systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg) and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support; 6. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure \> 70 mmHg on baseline echocardiography; 7. Significant contraindication to adenosine administration (e.g. heart block, severe asthma); 8. Extremely calcified or tortuous vessels precluding invasive coronary physiology measurement; 9. Acute coronary syndrome with recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction \<5 days prior to randomization, or ongoing non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome with biomarkers (cardiac troponin) still rising; 10. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive pericarditis, constrictive pericarditis, infiltrative cardiomyopathy; 11. Participation or planned participation in another clinical trial, except for observational registries; 12. Patients unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR).
Change from baseline of instantanepous wave free ration (iFR), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the instantanepous wave free ration (iFR).
Change from baseline of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio (RFR), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Resting Full-Cycle Ratio (RFR).
Change from baseline of Absolute coronary Blood Flow (ABF), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Absolute coronary Blood Flow (ABF).
Change from baseline of Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR).
Change from baseline of the Index for Microvascular Resistance (IMR), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Index for Microvascular Resistance (IMR).
Change from baseline of the Baseline Resistance Index (BRI), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Baseline Resistance Index (BRI).
Change from baseline of the Resistance Reserve Ratio (RRR), after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR).Immediately post TMVRThe primary endpoint of the study is the invasive pressure-derived physiological assessment of angiographically-documented intermediate coronary artery lesions before and after TMVR of the Resistance Reserve Ratio (RRR).

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026