Skip to content

Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Standard Face Mask Oxygen Therapy in Children With Bronchiolitis

Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Standard Face Mask Oxygen Therapy in Children With Moderate and Severe Bronchiolitis; a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04245202
Enrollment
87
Registered
2020-01-28
Start date
2017-03-14
Completion date
2020-03-10
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Bronchiolitis

Keywords

Acute Bronchiolitis, High Flow Nasal Cannula, Standard Face Mask

Brief summary

The study aims to compare the efficacy of two different oxygenation methods on decrease respiratory rate, heart rate, and clinical respiratory score in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis requiring oxygen therapy. 1. Standard face mask oxygen therapy (St-FMOT) 2. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNCOT)

Detailed description

Bronchiolitis is the most common cause of hospitalization for children under one year of age and, caused by respiratory viruses. Although several medications and interventions studied for bronchiolitis treatment, hydration and oxygenation are the main treatments. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNCOT) has been widely used to provide respiratory support in children with acute respiratory diseases. Patients had earlier improvement with HFNCOT to decrease the respiratory rate and respiratory effort than patients with standard low-flow oxygen therapy (SOT). HFNCOT therapy reduced more effective in heart rate, respiratory effort, and length of supportive oxygen treatment (LOOT) compared with SOT. However, the length of hospital stay (LOS) and feeding ability had better consequences in patients with moderate and severe bronchiolitis treated with HFNCOT. Another published study shows that in infants with acute bronchiolitis, which required oxygen therapy, there was no significant difference between therapy groups in terms of LOOT, LOS, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). HFNCOT was more efficient than SOT and reduced the rate of intubation/invasive ventilation in severe bronchiolitis management. Despite these beneficial effects of HFNCOT, it was not recommended by international guidelines yet. However, well designed, prospective randomized controlled trials are still needed to use this therapy in the wards.

Interventions

DEVICEHFNCOT

The patient will receive a high flow nasal of humidified oxygen, set between 2 to 25 l/min. The inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) will be adjusted to obtain the oxygen saturation \>92%.

OTHERSt-FMOT

The inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) will be adjusted to obtain the oxygen saturation \>92%.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged between 1-24 months applied with moderate and severe bronchiolitis requiring supplemental oxygen were eligible for the study. * The severity of bronchiolitis was assessed according to the clinical respiratory score (CRS) of Liu et al. (5). The patients with CRS ≥5 were included. * Peripheral oxyhemoglobin saturation is \< 92%.

Exclusion criteria

* Children admitted to the ICU for urgent invasive mechanical ventilation; * those who received standard oxygen therapy (SOT) or HFNCOT at other facilities before arrival; * those with an underlying medical condition (such as congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, neuromuscular disease, metabolic disease, or immunocompromised); * those who had a craniofacial malformation, an upper airway obstruction, pneumothorax, or nasal trauma, and missing parental consent or a refused permission of the participant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Heart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)through study completion, an average of 96 hoursThe time that heart rate takes into the normal range for age between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).
Time Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Respiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)through study completion, an average of 96 hoursThe time that the respiratory rate takes into the normal range for age between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).
Time Taken to Regress A Lower Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)through study completion, an average of 96 hoursUnabbreviated scale title: Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol analysis). The time that takes from severe bronchiolitis (9-12 points) to moderate bronchiolitis (5-8 points) or from moderate bronchiolitis (5-8 points) to mild bronchiolitis (0-4 points) between the groups. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The score ranges from 0-12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hoursAny differences in the time any recorded changes in respiratory rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).
Clinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hoursUnabbreviated scale title: Clinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat analysis) Any differences in the time any recorded changes in the clinical respiratory score from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups. This clinical respiratory score includes respiratory rate, retraction, dyspnea/consciousness status, and wheezing. The severity of parameters is scored 0 to 3 points, and the patients with a clinical respiratory score of 0-4 points were defined as mild, moderate (5-8 points), and severe (9-12 point) bronchiolitis. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The score ranges from 0-12.
Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hoursUnabbreviated scale title: Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol analysis). Any differences in the time any recorded changes in the clinical respiratory score from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups. This clinical respiratory score includes respiratory rate, retraction, dyspnea/consciousness status, and wheezing. The severity of parameters is scored 0 to 3 points, and the patients with a clinical respiratory score of 0-4 points were defined as mild, moderate (5-8 points), and severe (9-12 point) bronchiolitis. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The score ranges from 0-12.
Oxygen Requirement (Intention-to-treat Analysis)through study completion, an average of 168 hoursThe total duration of oxygen therapy (Intention-to-treat analysis).
Oxygen Requirement (Per-protocol Analysis)through study completion, an average of 168 hoursThe total duration of oxygen therapy (Per-protocol analysis).
Heart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hoursAny differences in the time any recorded changes in heart rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Intention-to-treat analysis).
Length of Hospital Stay (Per-protocol Analysis)through study completion, an average of 168 hoursThe time from randomization to the patient's discharge (Per-protocol analysis).
Treatment Failure at 4 Hours (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hoursThe number of treatment failures at 4 hours in each study arm (Intention-to-treat analysis).
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission (Intention-to-treat Analysis).through study completion, an average of 168 hoursThe number of participants admitted to the intensive care unit for invasive mechanical ventilation (Intention-to-treat analysis).
Adverse Events of Therapy (Intention-to-treat Analysis)through study completion, an average of 168 hoursThe number of participants with any adverse events in therapy groups (Intention-to-treat analysis).
Length of Hospital Stay (Intention-to-treat Analysis)through study completion, an average of 168 hoursThe time from randomization to the patient's discharge (Intention-to-treat analysis).
Heart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hoursAny differences in the time any recorded changes in heart rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).
Respiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hoursAny differences in the time any recorded changes in respiratory rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From March 14, 2017, through March 10, 2020, 5643 patients were presented to the emergency department and pediatric pulmonology unit of Ege University Medical Faculty. Four hundred seventy-two children were eligible for the study, with 134 missing opportunities to enroll, and 251 parents declined consent. We randomly assigned 87 children to Standard face mask oxygen therapy and High-Flow nasal cannula therapy.

Pre-assignment details

No patients were excluded from the study after participant enrollment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
St-FMOT
Children who received standard face mask oxygen treatment
48
HFNCOT
Children who received high flow nasal cannula oxygen treatment
39
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSt-FMOTHFNCOTTotal
Age, Continuous6.5 months6.0 months6.0 months
Baseline clinical respiratory score9.0 score on a scale9.5 score on a scale9.0 score on a scale
Baseline heart rate174.0 beat per minute170.0 beat per minute173.0 beat per minute
Baseline Oxygen Saturation88.0 percentage of saturated oxygen87.0 percentage of saturated oxygen88.0 percentage of saturated oxygen
Baseline respiratory rate64.5 Breaths per minute66.0 Breaths per minute66.0 Breaths per minute
Gestational age at birth
Prematurity (< 37 weeks)
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Gestational age at birth
Term infant (> 36 weeks)
41 Participants31 Participants72 Participants
Number of detected virus
1 virus
39 Participants32 Participants71 Participants
Number of detected virus
2 viruses
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Number of detected virus
No virus
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
48 participants39 participants87 participants
Season admitted
Autumn
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Season admitted
Spring
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Season admitted
Summer
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Season admitted
Winter
28 Participants25 Participants53 Participants
Severity of clinical respiratory score
Moderate
18 Participants9 Participants27 Participants
Severity of clinical respiratory score
Severe
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants15 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants24 Participants51 Participants
Virus detected
FLUA
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Virus detected
HBoV
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Virus detected
HBoV+hCOV
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Virus detected
hCoV
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Virus detected
hCOV+hAV
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Virus detected
hMPV
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Virus detected
hMPV+hCOV
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Virus detected
HRV
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Virus detected
HRV+FLUA
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Virus detected
HRV+HBoV
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Virus detected
No virus
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Virus detected
PIV3
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Virus detected
RSV
19 Participants21 Participants40 Participants
Virus detected
RSV+FLUA
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Virus detected
RSV+HBoV
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Virus detected
RSV+hCOV
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Virus detected
RSV+HRV
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Virus detected
RSV+PIV2
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Virus detected
RSV+PIV3
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Weight at the admission (kg)7.4 kilogram8.0 kilogram8.0 kilogram

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 391 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Time Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Heart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)

The time that heart rate takes into the normal range for age between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 96 hours

Population: The population of the per-protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTTime Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Heart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hour
HFNCOTTime Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Heart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hour
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Time Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Respiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)

The time that the respiratory rate takes into the normal range for age between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 96 hours

Population: The population of the per-protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTTime Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Respiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hour
HFNCOTTime Taken to Reach the Normal Range for Respiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hour
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Time Taken to Regress A Lower Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)

Unabbreviated scale title: Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol analysis). The time that takes from severe bronchiolitis (9-12 points) to moderate bronchiolitis (5-8 points) or from moderate bronchiolitis (5-8 points) to mild bronchiolitis (0-4 points) between the groups. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The score ranges from 0-12.

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 96 hours

Population: The population of the per-protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTTime Taken to Regress A Lower Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hour
HFNCOTTime Taken to Regress A Lower Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hour
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Adverse Events of Therapy (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

The number of participants with any adverse events in therapy groups (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 168 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
St-FMOTAdverse Events of Therapy (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 Participants
HFNCOTAdverse Events of Therapy (Intention-to-treat Analysis)5 Participants
p-value: 0.08Fisher Exact
Secondary

Clinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

Unabbreviated scale title: Clinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat analysis) Any differences in the time any recorded changes in the clinical respiratory score from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups. This clinical respiratory score includes respiratory rate, retraction, dyspnea/consciousness status, and wheezing. The severity of parameters is scored 0 to 3 points, and the patients with a clinical respiratory score of 0-4 points were defined as mild, moderate (5-8 points), and severe (9-12 point) bronchiolitis. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The score ranges from 0-12.

Time frame: Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 hour8.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)24 hours4.5 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hours7.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)48 hours3.5 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)2 hours8.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)72 hours2.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)12 hours5.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)96 hours1.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline9.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)96 hours1.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline10.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 hour7.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)2 hours6.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hours5.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)12 hours5.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)24 hours4.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)48 hours2.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Intention-to-treat Analysis)72 hours2.0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.002Brunner-Langer Method
Secondary

Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)

Unabbreviated scale title: Clinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol analysis). Any differences in the time any recorded changes in the clinical respiratory score from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups. This clinical respiratory score includes respiratory rate, retraction, dyspnea/consciousness status, and wheezing. The severity of parameters is scored 0 to 3 points, and the patients with a clinical respiratory score of 0-4 points were defined as mild, moderate (5-8 points), and severe (9-12 point) bronchiolitis. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The score ranges from 0-12.

Time frame: Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hours

Population: Per-protocol analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)1 hour8.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hours4.5 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hours6.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)48 hours3.5 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hours7.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)72 hours2.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hours5.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)96 hours1.0 score on a scale
St-FMOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline9.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)96 hours1.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline9.5 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)1 hour7.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hours6.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hours5.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hours5.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hours4.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)48 hours2.0 score on a scale
HFNCOTClinical Respiratory Score (Per-protocol Analysis)72 hours2.0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.001Brunner-Langer Method
Secondary

Heart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

Any differences in the time any recorded changes in heart rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 hour166.21 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)24 hours142.96 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hours159.65 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)48 hours139.21 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)2 hours164.00 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)72 hours135.99 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)12 hours153.43 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)96 hours133.61 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline172.90 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)96 hours119.47 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline171.05 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 hour151.28 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)2 hours146.59 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hours138.05 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)12 hours132.47 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)24 hours132.56 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)48 hours128.48 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)72 hours124.96 beats per minute
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-23.53, -1.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Heart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)

Any differences in the time any recorded changes in heart rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).

Time frame: Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hours

Population: Per-protocol analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)1 hour160.76 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hours138.45 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hours150.66 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)48 hours135.97 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hours157.58 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)72 hours136.43 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hours147.08 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)96 hours133.85 beats per minute
St-FMOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline169.03 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)96 hours122.53 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline170.37 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)1 hour150.37 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hours145.39 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hours136.42 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hours131.32 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hours131.74 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)48 hours127.89 beats per minute
HFNCOTHeart Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)72 hours124.57 beats per minute
Comparison: The p-Value of the interaction between time and groups was given. In all analyses, p values \<0·05 were considered being statistically significant.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-22.05, -3.28]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

The time from randomization to the patient's discharge (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 168 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTLength of Hospital Stay (Intention-to-treat Analysis)5.5 day
HFNCOTLength of Hospital Stay (Intention-to-treat Analysis)5.0 day
p-value: 0.22Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay (Per-protocol Analysis)

The time from randomization to the patient's discharge (Per-protocol analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 168 hours

Population: Per-protocol analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTLength of Hospital Stay (Per-protocol Analysis)5 day
HFNCOTLength of Hospital Stay (Per-protocol Analysis)5 day
p-value: 0.99Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Oxygen Requirement (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

The total duration of oxygen therapy (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 168 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTOxygen Requirement (Intention-to-treat Analysis)29.5 hour
HFNCOTOxygen Requirement (Intention-to-treat Analysis)19.0 hour
Secondary

Oxygen Requirement (Per-protocol Analysis)

The total duration of oxygen therapy (Per-protocol analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 168 hours

Population: Per-protocol analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTOxygen Requirement (Per-protocol Analysis)24.0 hour
HFNCOTOxygen Requirement (Per-protocol Analysis)18.5 hour
p-value: 0.08Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission (Intention-to-treat Analysis).

The number of participants admitted to the intensive care unit for invasive mechanical ventilation (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 168 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
St-FMOTPediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission (Intention-to-treat Analysis).10 Participants
HFNCOTPediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission (Intention-to-treat Analysis).1 Participants
p-value: 0.02Fisher Exact
Secondary

Respiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

Any differences in the time any recorded changes in respiratory rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hours

Population: Intention to treat analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 hour60.20 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)24 hours46.54 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hours55.54 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)48 hours41.89 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)2 hours57.45 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)72 hours39.24 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)12 hours51.06 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)96 hours37.75 Breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline65.08 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)96 hours35.47 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)Baseline66.71 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 hour56.84 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)2 hours51.10 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)4 hours46.56 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)12 hours44.15 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)24 hours40.82 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)48 hours39.32 Breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Intention-to-treat Analysis)72 hours36.70 Breaths per minute
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8.68, 0.86]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Respiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)

Any differences in the time any recorded changes in respiratory rate from randomization to the patients' discharge within the groups and between the groups (Per-protocol analysis).

Time frame: Baseline, 1,2,4,12,24,48,72 and 96 hours

Population: Per-protocol analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline65.52 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hours48.13 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hours55.34 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)48 hours40.07 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)1 hour59.50 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)72 hours37.82 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hours51.81 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)96 hours36.63 breaths per minute
St-FMOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hours44.23 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)96 hours35.37 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)24 hours40.47 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)Baseline66.68 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)1 hour56.60 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)2 hours50.65 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)4 hours46.00 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)12 hours43.71 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)48 hours39.05 breaths per minute
HFNCOTRespiratory Rate (Per-protocol Analysis)72 hours36.51 breaths per minute
Comparison: The p-Value of the interaction between time and groups was given. In all analysis, p values \<0.05 were considered being statistically significant.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-6.62, 1.78]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Treatment Failure at 4 Hours (Intention-to-treat Analysis)

The number of treatment failures at 4 hours in each study arm (Intention-to-treat analysis).

Time frame: 4 hours

Population: The population of the intention to treat.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
St-FMOTTreatment Failure at 4 Hours (Intention-to-treat Analysis)10 Participants
HFNCOTTreatment Failure at 4 Hours (Intention-to-treat Analysis)1 Participants
p-value: 0.02Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026