Skip to content

Genetic Testing for All Breast Cancer Patients (GET FACTS)

Genetic Testing for All Breast Cancer Patients (GET FACTS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04245176
Enrollment
400
Registered
2020-01-28
Start date
2020-01-31
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2026-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Genetic Testing, in Situ Breast Cancer, Invasive Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Invasive Breast Cancer, in Situ Breast Cancer, Genetic Testing, Quantitative genetic counseling, Standard genetic counseling

Brief summary

This study is designed to determine the impact of a novel genetic counseling method on surgical decisions in individuals with newly diagnosed breast cancer This research study involves an expedited and surgery-specific form of genetic counseling. The names of the study methods involved in this trial are/is: * Quantitative genetic counseling (discussion is guided by tables and graphs) * Standard genetic counseling

Detailed description

* The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study interventions including evaluations and follow up visits * After receiving genetic testing, participants will be placed into one of two counseling methodology groups: * Standard genetic counseling: Standard of care discussion * Quantitative genetic counseling: Discussion is guided by tables and graphs. * Participants will be on the research study for up to six months, with an optional extension to two years. * It is expected that about 450 people will participate. * This research study is a Feasibility Study, which is the first-time investigators are examining this form of genetic counseling. * This is a randomized study. Randomization means being put into a group by chance. It is like flipping a coin. Neither the participant nor the Investigator will choose the group the participant is assigned to.

Interventions

Standard genetic counseling: Standard of care discussion

BEHAVIORALQuantitative Genetic Counseling

Quantitative genetic counseling: Discussion is guided by tables and graphs.

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis (invasive or in-situ) considering genetic testing * Patients with good understanding of written and spoken English * Patients with apparent cognitive capacity to make surgical decisions for themselves * Patients who are medically cleared for surgery * Patients must be at least age 18 but under 79

Exclusion criteria

* Previous breast cancer diagnosis (invasive or DCIS) * Metastatic breast cancer * Patients who have received prior broad-based panel testing (prior BRCA1/2 testing with negative results allowed) * Bilateral breast cancer * Known medical or surgical contraindication to contralateral mastectomy * Hematologic malignancy necessitating skin biopsy/fibroblast culture for germline genetic testing malignancy other than cervical cis or basal or squamous cell skin cancers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in patient's assessment of their personal contralateral breast cancer risk1 monthA short survey, self-developed in conjunction with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute professional survey core, will be used to compare changes in patients' personal contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk assessment after quantitative versus standard genetic counseling. The question reads: "By the time you turn 80 years old, what do you believe is the chance you will develop cancer in the other (unaffected) breast?" and answer options are in 10% increments (ie. 0-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%). Their individual assessment of their risk will be collected before and after genetic counseling and will be compared to CBCRisk (for those without gene mutations) or ASK2ME (for those with gene mutations).
Change in patient's propensity to choose bilateral mastectomy as determined by a short self-developed survey question1 monthPatient's will be surveyed about their personal propensity to choose a bilateral mastectomy as the surgical treatment of a unilateral cancer before and after quantitative vs. standard counseling. This survey question was self-developed in conjunction with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute professional survey core. The question reads: "How likely or unlikely are you to choose surgery to remove both breasts (bilateral mastectomy) for your cancer in one breast (unilateral or one-sided breast cancer)?"s answer options include the following: "Very unlikely, Somewhat unlikely, Unsure (neither likely nor unlikely), Somewhat likely, Very likely).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Genetic Testing Satisfaction6 MonthsBreast cancer patient satisfaction with genetic counseling practices,comparing the delivery of results by quantitative counseling versus standard counseling, as measured by the Genetic Testing Satisfaction Survey (GTS).
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Rate6 MonthsCPM rates will be measured and compared between patients who undergo quantitative versus standard genetic counseling.
Level of anxiety among participants, as measured by the PROMIS anxiety scale6 monthsPatients' level of anxiety will be compared between quantitative versus standard genetic counseling to monitor that we are avoiding undue stress on the patients. We will use the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) anxiety scale. Scores can range from 8-40, with 40 indicating worse anxiety.
Number of participants with decisional regret (testing and surgery choices)6 monthsDecisional regret will be measured and compared between quantitative versus standard genetic counseling, for both the decision to undergo genetic testing and the surgical choice that was made.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTara King, MD

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 5, 2026