Skip to content

Treating Self Injurious Behavior: A Novel Brain Stimulation Approach

Treating Self Injurious Behavior: A Novel Brain Stimulation Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04244786
Enrollment
13
Registered
2020-01-28
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2022-07-29
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, Cutting, Depression, Non Suicidal Self Inflicted Injury, Non-Suicidal Self Injury, Self Harm, Self-inflicted Injury, Self-Injurious Behavior, Self Injurious Behavior Without Suicidal Intent, Self-injury

Keywords

Transcranial direct current stimulation, Transcranial electric stimulation, non-invasive brain stimulation, tDCS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the tolerability and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a potential treatment for non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Individuals who engage in frequent NSSI will be randomized to 12 administrations of an active vs. inactive form of tDCS, paired with an Attention Training Technique task, over a two-week period. Functional MRI may be performed before and after this two week period. NSSI urges and behaviors will be monitored before, during, and after the period of tDCS administrations.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to explore the tolerability and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a potential treatment for non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). NSSI is the deliberate attempt to harm oneself, most often through cutting or burning, without suicidal intent. NSSI is a maladaptive emotion-regulation strategy often triggered by negative emotions, especially those involving feelings of rejection. tDCS is a low-cost, portable, well-tolerated, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that delivers a low current to a specific area of the brain via electrodes. Several studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in treating an array of conditions, depending on electrode placement, including depression and chronic pain. tDCS may also facilitate adaptive emotion regulation; researchers have also successfully used tDCS to reduce negative emotions and aggressive responses to social rejection. The investigators therefore seek to explore tDCS as a potential treatment for NSSI. This pilot feasibility study seeks 1) to examine how tDCS is tolerated in a sample of individuals who engage in frequent NSSI; 2) to gather pilot data regarding changes in emotional and neural responses during a social task after a series of tDCS sessions in this clinical population of individuals who engage in NSSI; 3) to gather pilot data on the effects of tDCS on NSSI behaviors and urges. The investigators seek to recruit a sample of 22 individuals who engage in frequent NSSI to complete all study procedures. Individuals will be randomized to receive active- or sham-tDCS for two twenty-minute applications on each of six alternating sessions over approximately two weeks for a total of 12 tDCS administrations, each paired with an Attention Training Task. Functional MRI (fMRI) may be performed at baseline and again after the completion of 12 applications of tDCS. Subjects' NSSI and urges to engage in NSSI will be recorded for four weeks in real-time, using an iPod- based system that reminds subjects to stop at certain times during the day to record their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. This will allow measurement of NSSI urges and behaviors for one week before, two weeks during, and one week after the tDCS intervention. The long-term goal of this study is to identify a novel form of treatment for NSSI and to better understand NSSI pathophysiology.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial direct current stimulation

tDCS is a low-cost, portable, well-tolerated, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that delivers a low current to a specific area of the brain via electrodes.

OTHERNo intervention

No intervention for participants who discontinued prior to randomization

Sponsors

New York State Psychiatric Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

tDCS device programmed with codes to deliver active vs. sham tDCS in a blinded manner. Individual independent of study team managed randomization and provided codes for blinded tDCS administration.

Intervention model description

Double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. 2 arms of clinical trial. Listing 3 arms to include an arm for individuals who signed consent but discontinued prior to randomization and clinical intervention, to describe available data and adverse events in this group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-60 2. Frequent current NSSI (including cutting in which the skin is broken; self-hitting in which there is bruising; or burning in which there is evidence of a burn. Will not enroll if skin-picking or scratching is the only form of self-injury): has engaged in ≥2 episodes of NSSI in the two months prior to enrollment 3. Capacity to provide informed consent 4. If carries a diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder, taking or willing to begin a therapeutic dose of a mood stabilizer. 5. Normal hearing. 6. Physical capacity (e.g., manual dexterity) to set-up and self-administer tDCS. -

Exclusion criteria

1. Unstable medical conditions based on medical history or physical examination 2. Current psychotic disorder, mania, hypomania, intellectual disability 3. Dermatologic condition resulting in non-intact skin on the scalp 4. Significant suicidal ideation with a plan and intent that cannot be managed safely as an outpatient 5. Pregnancy, currently lactating, or planning to conceive during the course of study participation. 6. A neurological disease or prior head trauma with evidence of cognitive impairment. Subjects who endorse a history of prior head trauma and score ≥ 1.5 standard deviations below the mean on the Trailmaking A&B will be excluded from study participation. 7. Current alcohol or substance use disorder that is severe according to DSM-V criteria 8. Individuals who initiated or increased the dose of concurrent psychiatric medications (including antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotic medications, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines) within two weeks prior to enrollment 9. Individuals who initiated psychotherapy within two weeks prior to enrollment 10. Current seizure disorder. 11. Use of anticonvulsant medications that target the GABA system (e.g., gabapentin). 12. Individuals currently using benzodiazepines who are unwilling or unable to refrain from the use of benzodiazepine medications for at least 72 hours before the first tDCS session and throughout the duration of the 2-week tDCS intervention. 13. Metal implants or paramagnetic objects contained within the body (including heart pacemaker, shrapnel, or surgical prostheses) which may present a risk to the subject or interfere with the MRI scan, according to the guidelines set forth in the following reference book commonly used by neuroradiologists: Guide to MR procedures and metallic objects, F.G. Shellock, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins NY 2001. Additionally transdermal patches will be removed during the MR study at the discretion of the investigator. 14. Claustrophobia significant enough to interfere with MRI scanning 15. Weight that exceeds 325 lbs or inability to fit into MRI scanner 16. Suicide attempt within the past 3 months 17. Serious self-harm resulting in hospitalization within the past 3 months. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following items are reported here: sitbi 61: What is the likelihood you will have thoughts about engaging in NSSI in the future? (0: very unlikely to 4: very likely) sitbi 72: What do you think is the likelihood you will engage in NSSI in the future? (0: very unlikely to 4: very likely)
Social Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesPre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (up to 2 weeks)The Cyberball task is a task used during functional MRI scanning. During the task, individuals play a virtual ball-tossing game, playing catch with two computer avatars, and have a social exclusion experience when the avatars stop tossing the ball to them. The outcome measure is a subtraction of a measure of brain activity (fMRI BOLD signal) during portions of the task when the individual is included in the virtual ball-tossing game as compared to periods when the individual is excluded (i.e. fMRI BOLD signal inclusion periods - fMRI BOLD signal exclusion periods). This is quantified in 7 specific brain regions specified in the table below. dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate. vlPFC = ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. AI = anterior insula. The unit of measurement is a beta-weight from a general linear model (a statistical model) and a higher value reflects greater activity in a given brain region during experiences of social exclusion as compared to social inclusion.
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorOne week before tDCS (baseline), two weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), one week post-tDCS (post-tDCS)EMA assessment of NSSI urges and behavior before, during, and after tDCS intervention. EMA is a tool through which participants can respond to a brief questionnaire on a smartphone device while going about their daily lives. Participants were prompted to complete a brief questionnaire 6 times per day over a 4 week period (one week before tDCS (baseline), 2 weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), and one week after the final tDCS administration (post-tDCS)), which asks questions about urges to engage in NSSI and in actual NSSI behavior. Scores, coded on a scale from 1-5, are averaged across all prompts during the time period (baseline, during tDCS, post-tDCS). A higher score indicates more severe symptoms except for success at resisting thoughts, which is reverse-coded.
Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following items are reported in this table: Sitbi 58: At their worst, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in NSSI? (0: very mild to 4: very severe) sitbi 59: On average, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in NSSI? (0: very mild to 4: very severe)
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorOne week before tDCS (baseline), two weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), one week post-tDCS (post-tDCS)EMA assessment of NSSI urges and behavior before, during, and after tDCS intervention. EMA is a tool through which participants can respond to a brief questionnaire on a smartphone device while going about their daily lives. Participants were prompted to complete a brief questionnaire 6 times per day over a 4 week period (one week before tDCS (baseline), 2 weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), and one week after the final tDCS administration (post-tDCS)), which asks questions about urges to engage in NSSI and in actual NSSI behavior. Items refer to the proportion of survey responses in which an individual endorsed the given thought or behavior or attempted to resist NSSI thoughts since the previous response (0 to 1), with yes scored as 1 and no scored as a zero.
Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 2pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (up to 2 weeks)Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following item is reported in this table: sitbi 68: How many times \[did you self-injure\] in the past week? (number entered, minimum = 0, maximum = no limit)
Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 3Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following item is reported in this table: sitbi 60: When you have had these thoughts: how long have they usually lasted? (0: 0 seconds to 6: more than 2 days)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
tDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireAdministered after each (12) tDCS session over 6 daysA questionnaire to evaluate side-effects related to tDCS administration. This questionnaire asks about the presence and severity of possible side-effects of tDCS procedures, and was recently published as a gold-standard tool for this purpose: Aparício LVM, Guarienti F, Razza LB, Carvalho AF, Fregni F, Brunoni AR. A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials. Brain Stimul. 2016 Oct;9(5):671-81. This is an 11-item scale, that asks about the occurrence and severity of a range of possible side-effects during or after tDCS administration. Each side-effect can be rated as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Summary data regarding the number of participants who endorsed a listed side-effect from the scale during at least one tDCS administration are presented here. Each participant was asked about the presence and severity of all listed side-effects after each administration of tDCS.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC)
active anodal tDCS to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). 1.5 milliamp (mA) anodal tDCS over right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; 12 20-minute administrations over 6-sessions Transcranial direct current stimulation: tDCS is a low-cost, portable, well-tolerated, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that delivers a low current to a specific area of the brain via electrodes.
3
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC
sham anodal tDCS to VLPFC Identical electrode montage, 12 administrations of sham tDCS over 6 sessions. Transcranial direct current stimulation: tDCS is a low-cost, portable, well-tolerated, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that delivers a low current to a specific area of the brain via electrodes.
3
Discontinued Prior to Randomization
Participants who enrolled in the study but discontinued before being randomized to either active or sham arms of the study No intervention: No intervention for participants who discontinued prior to randomization
7
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject005

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC)TotalDiscontinued Prior to RandomizationSham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC
Age, Continuous24.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
23.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
25.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants11 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants10 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants13 participants7 participants3 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
3 Participants10 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-Binary
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 30 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 33 / 30 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 32 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and Behavior

EMA assessment of NSSI urges and behavior before, during, and after tDCS intervention. EMA is a tool through which participants can respond to a brief questionnaire on a smartphone device while going about their daily lives. Participants were prompted to complete a brief questionnaire 6 times per day over a 4 week period (one week before tDCS (baseline), 2 weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), and one week after the final tDCS administration (post-tDCS)), which asks questions about urges to engage in NSSI and in actual NSSI behavior. Scores, coded on a scale from 1-5, are averaged across all prompts during the time period (baseline, during tDCS, post-tDCS). A higher score indicates more severe symptoms except for success at resisting thoughts, which is reverse-coded.

Time frame: One week before tDCS (baseline), two weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), one week post-tDCS (post-tDCS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorSuccess at resisting self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.6667 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9428
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDuration of self-injury thoughts: during tDCS0.6770 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3366
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorStrength of self-injury thoughts: baseline1.2697 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6952
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDuration of self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.3333 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4714
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDifficulty resisting self-injury thoughts: baseline1.0587 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6349
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDifficulty resisting self-injury thoughts: during tDCS1.0636 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8165
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDifficulty resisting self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.5667 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8014
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorSuccess at resisting self-injury thoughts: baseline1.0774 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8346
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorStrength of self-injury thoughts: during tDCS1.1186 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7094
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorSuccess at resisting self-injury thoughts: during tDCS1.0476 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8987
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorStrength of self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.5667 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8014
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDuration of self-injury thoughts: baseline0.9821 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4538
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorSuccess at resisting self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.4444 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5092
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorStrength of self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS1.38 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9439
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDuration of self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS1.2307 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9196
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDifficulty resisting self-injury thoughts: baseline1.0711 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8945
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDifficulty resisting self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.7879 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0654
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorStrength of self-injury thoughts: baseline1.5285 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0736
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDuration of self-injury thoughts: baseline1.2479 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1492
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDuration of self-injury thoughts: during tDCS0.9503 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9765
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorDifficulty resisting self-injury thoughts: during tDCS0.9338 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorSuccess at resisting self-injury thoughts: baseline0.8344 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5786
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorSuccess at resisting self-injury thoughts: during tDCS0.7404 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6601
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): Duration, Intensity, and Severity of NSSI Urges and BehaviorStrength of self-injury thoughts: during tDCS1.2294 Average score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9414
Primary

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and Behavior

EMA assessment of NSSI urges and behavior before, during, and after tDCS intervention. EMA is a tool through which participants can respond to a brief questionnaire on a smartphone device while going about their daily lives. Participants were prompted to complete a brief questionnaire 6 times per day over a 4 week period (one week before tDCS (baseline), 2 weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), and one week after the final tDCS administration (post-tDCS)), which asks questions about urges to engage in NSSI and in actual NSSI behavior. Items refer to the proportion of survey responses in which an individual endorsed the given thought or behavior or attempted to resist NSSI thoughts since the previous response (0 to 1), with yes scored as 1 and no scored as a zero.

Time frame: One week before tDCS (baseline), two weeks during tDCS (during tDCS), one week post-tDCS (post-tDCS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorAttempted to resist self-injury thoughts: baseline0.3658 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2531
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorThoughts of self-injury: during tDCS0.4084 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2963
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorAttempted to resist self-injury thoughts: during tDCS0.3509 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2937
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorAttempted to resist self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.2 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2828
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorSelf-harm behavior: baseline0.0975 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.1082
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorSelf-harm behavior: during tDCS0.1261 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.1615
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorThoughts of self-injury: post-tDCS0.2333 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.33
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorSelf-harm behavior: post-tDCS0.1 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.1414
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorThoughts of self-injury: baseline0.4453 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2874
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorSelf-harm behavior: post-tDCS0.0967 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.1343
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorAttempted to resist self-injury thoughts: during tDCS0.2803 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2644
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorSelf-harm behavior: baseline0.1759 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.1818
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorThoughts of self-injury: during tDCS0.3661 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2166
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorThoughts of self-injury: post-tDCS0.3937 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2379
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorAttempted to resist self-injury thoughts: baseline0.3146 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.247
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorAttempted to resist self-injury thoughts: post-tDCS0.2071 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2608
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorSelf-harm behavior: during tDCS0.1073 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.1298
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA): NSSI Urges and BehaviorThoughts of self-injury: baseline0.4664 Proportion of promptsStandard Deviation 0.2274
Primary

Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1

Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following items are reported in this table: Sitbi 58: At their worst, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in NSSI? (0: very mild to 4: very severe) sitbi 59: On average, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in NSSI? (0: very mild to 4: very severe)

Time frame: Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1At their worst, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 58)2.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1On average, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 59)1.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1On average, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 59)2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1At their worst, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 58)2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1At their worst, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 58)2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1On average, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 59)1.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1On average, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 59)2.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 1At their worst, how intense were your thoughts about engaging in self-harm? (sitbi 58)2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Primary

Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 2

Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following item is reported in this table: sitbi 68: How many times \[did you self-injure\] in the past week? (number entered, minimum = 0, maximum = no limit)

Time frame: pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (up to 2 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 24.33 Number of eventsStandard Deviation 2.52
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 21.33 Number of eventsStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 29.67 Number of eventsStandard Deviation 13.43
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 21.33 Number of eventsStandard Deviation 2.31
Primary

Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 3

Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following item is reported in this table: sitbi 60: When you have had these thoughts: how long have they usually lasted? (0: 0 seconds to 6: more than 2 days)

Time frame: Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 32.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 32.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 33.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 33.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Primary

Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4

Selected items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) were used at baseline and after the tDCS or sham intervention as outcome measures in this study. These items ask participants to report on their NSSI thoughts and behaviors over the past week. The following items are reported here: sitbi 61: What is the likelihood you will have thoughts about engaging in NSSI in the future? (0: very unlikely to 4: very likely) sitbi 72: What do you think is the likelihood you will engage in NSSI in the future? (0: very unlikely to 4: very likely)

Time frame: Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-tDCS (up to 2 weeks after baseline)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm thoughts (sitbi 61)4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm (sitbi 72)4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm (sitbi 72)3.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm thoughts (sitbi 61)33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm thoughts (sitbi 61)4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm (sitbi 72)3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm thoughts (sitbi 61)4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSelf Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Inventory Part 4Likelihood of future self-harm (sitbi 72)3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Primary

Social Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI Responses

The Cyberball task is a task used during functional MRI scanning. During the task, individuals play a virtual ball-tossing game, playing catch with two computer avatars, and have a social exclusion experience when the avatars stop tossing the ball to them. The outcome measure is a subtraction of a measure of brain activity (fMRI BOLD signal) during portions of the task when the individual is included in the virtual ball-tossing game as compared to periods when the individual is excluded (i.e. fMRI BOLD signal inclusion periods - fMRI BOLD signal exclusion periods). This is quantified in 7 specific brain regions specified in the table below. dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate. vlPFC = ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. AI = anterior insula. The unit of measurement is a beta-weight from a general linear model (a statistical model) and a higher value reflects greater activity in a given brain region during experiences of social exclusion as compared to social inclusion.

Time frame: Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (up to 2 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 281 (right vlPFC)-234.9502234 beta-weightStandard Deviation 454.57709537062
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 240 (right vlPFC)-227.9885197 beta-weightStandard Deviation 395.65696014195
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 247 (right AI)-247.2044975 beta-weightStandard Deviation 466.61315305963
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 183 (right dACC)-651.4402542 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1422.0518670889
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 241 (right vlPFC)-335.4290303 beta-weightStandard Deviation 565.88946960588
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 29 (left dACC)-621.4739585 beta-weightStandard Deviation 819.58606846675
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 242 (right vlPFC)-756.0566932 beta-weightStandard Deviation 956.69043909054
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 183 (right dACC)-581.3360775 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1419.488164156
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 240 (right vlPFC)-203.971185 beta-weightStandard Deviation 671.54324931238
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 242 (right vlPFC)-297.5780364 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1289.3740570339
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 247 (right AI)-495.6796714 beta-weightStandard Deviation 758.72874358403
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 281 (right vlPFC)-229.4499879 beta-weightStandard Deviation 706.9215679631
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 29 (left dACC)-519.1597701 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1187.3713291081
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 241 (right vlPFC)-215.3886576 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1194.5755014134
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 247 (right AI)-127.9602427 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1163.6302170131
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 242 (right vlPFC)320.32500074999 beta-weightStandard Deviation 986.09839303323
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 241 (right vlPFC)50.34725113 beta-weightStandard Deviation 456.40817606524
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 29 (left dACC)-63.33972338 beta-weightStandard Deviation 851.26348872338
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 183 (right dACC)-324.0953143 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1101.3079494312
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 240 (right vlPFC)446.1573213 beta-weightStandard Deviation 650.27267162975
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Pre-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 281 (right vlPFC)220.64673762500 beta-weightStandard Deviation 609.39673885219
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 29 (left dACC)-396.4460666 beta-weightStandard Deviation 779.73833545212
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 183 (right dACC)-168.76175 beta-weightStandard Deviation 679.73029181028
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 242 (right vlPFC)48.925466799999 beta-weightStandard Deviation 730.9408131228
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 281 (right vlPFC)-137.8113024 beta-weightStandard Deviation 437.9420888
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 240 (right vlPFC)-287.2243125 beta-weightStandard Deviation 839.18680962738
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 241 (right vlPFC)57.968314699999 beta-weightStandard Deviation 956.33384050042
Active Anodal tDCS to Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC): Post-treatmentSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 247 (right AI)-93.3563077 beta-weightStandard Deviation 888.06111718986
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 247 (right AI)-141.689008 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1181.0573804472
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 242 (right vlPFC)-264.4217283 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1149.8191589249
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 241 (right vlPFC)-482.2452623 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1373.3034293132
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 183 (right dACC)384.62016755555 beta-weightStandard Deviation 2082.297287103
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 281 (right vlPFC)-179.9291584 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1004.2419972306
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 240 (right vlPFC)-588.4478376 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1036.4740809912
Discontinued Prior to RandomizationSocial Processing (Cyberball) fMRI Task: fMRI ResponsesParcel 29 (left dACC)286.13477133333 beta-weightStandard Deviation 1560.1228270282
Other Pre-specified

tDCS Adverse Effects Questionnaire

A questionnaire to evaluate side-effects related to tDCS administration. This questionnaire asks about the presence and severity of possible side-effects of tDCS procedures, and was recently published as a gold-standard tool for this purpose: Aparício LVM, Guarienti F, Razza LB, Carvalho AF, Fregni F, Brunoni AR. A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials. Brain Stimul. 2016 Oct;9(5):671-81. This is an 11-item scale, that asks about the occurrence and severity of a range of possible side-effects during or after tDCS administration. Each side-effect can be rated as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Summary data regarding the number of participants who endorsed a listed side-effect from the scale during at least one tDCS administration are presented here. Each participant was asked about the presence and severity of all listed side-effects after each administration of tDCS.

Time frame: Administered after each (12) tDCS session over 6 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireItching3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireBurning sensation3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireSleepiness3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireSkin Redness3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireHeadache2 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireNeck Pain0 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireTrouble concentrating3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireAcute mood change0 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireScalp pain1 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireOther1 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Pre-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireTingling3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireOther2 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireNeck Pain1 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireTrouble concentrating3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireItching2 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireScalp pain1 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireTingling2 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireBurning sensation3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireSkin Redness3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireSleepiness2 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireAcute mood change3 Participants
Sham Anodal tDCS to VLPFC: Post-treatmenttDCS Adverse Effects QuestionnaireHeadache2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026