Clinical Outcome, Endodontic Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the endodontic outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair, endodontic microsurgery.
Detailed description
The patients were recruited at the Endodontic clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand. Each treatment was provided following the standard protocol. The calcium silicate based material (Bio-MA or ProRoot MTA) was randomly selected and used in the treatment. The patients were periodically recalled at 6 to 12 months. The outcome of the three treatments based on the clinical and radiographic criteria was assessed by the calibrated examiners and interpreted as ''healed/healing or ''disease.''
Interventions
Calcium silicate cement for using in endodontic treatments i.e. pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair, and endodontic microsurgery.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Teeth treated with pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair or endodontic microsurgery
Exclusion criteria
* Teeth with un-restorable condition * Teeth with crack or fracture * Teeth with external or internal root resorption * Teeth with chronic periodontitis with marginal bone loss more than 5 mm
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Healed rate | At least 1 year recall | No clinical sign and symptoms and periapical area in radiograph is normal. Describe in percentage. |
| Healing rate | At least 1 year recall | No clinical sign and symptoms and periapical lesion in radiograph is reduce in size. Describe in percentage. |
| Disease rate | At least 1 year recall | Clinical sign and symptoms is present and/or periapical lesion in radiograph is unchange or enlarge. Describe in percentage. |
Countries
Thailand