Skip to content

A Trial of Traffic Light Labeling With Behavioral Nudges and a Healthy Recipe Database to Increase Selection of Healthier Foods in Client-choice Food Pantries

Healthy Pantry Program Intervention Evaluation (HAPPIE)

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04243252
Enrollment
3
Registered
2020-01-28
Start date
2020-03-05
Completion date
2020-03-12
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Selection

Keywords

food insecurity

Brief summary

This study is a pilot evaluation of the Healthy Pantry Program, a new behavioral economics-based training that allows pantry staff to learn how to implement nudges integrating traffic-light nutrition labeling and a healthy recipe database in the pantry environment. The hypothesis is that participation the Healthy Pantry Program will lead to increases in pantry purchases of healthy foods.

Detailed description

Food insecurity affects more than one in 10 Americans and is associated with poor nutrition and adverse health outcomes, including diabetes, hypertension, and mental health issues. Many food-insecure individuals use food pantries, which provide charitable food, to supplement household food needs. The emergence of client-choice food pantries, where individuals can select the foods they take home, provides a novel opportunity to intervene on the diets of food pantry clients. This study evaluates the Healthy Pantry Program (HPP) in a sample of 10 food pantries in the greater Boston area. Pantries will be matched on baseline characteristics and randomized 1:1 into participation in HPP (intervention) or wait list (control). Outcomes data will be collected at the pantry and client level. The aims of the study are as follows: Aim 1: To evaluate whether HPP is associated with increased healthy food purchases from the food bank by intervention food pantries compared to control food pantries. Aim 2: To evaluate whether HPP is associated with increases in the availability of healthy food in intervention food pantries compared to control food pantries. Aim 3: To evaluate whether HPP is associated with an increase in healthy food selection and dietary intake by clients of intervention food pantries compared to clients of control food pantries, using a cross-sectional sample of 400 food pantry clients at baseline and 400 food pantry clients at 6-month follow up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealthy Pantry Program

Food pantries will receive the Healthy Pantry Program online training, which will be completed by at least one pantry staff member and teaches pantry staff a novel traffic-light nutrition labeling system, a multilingual healthy recipe database, and how to use those and other behavioral economic strategies to implement simple interventions in the food pantry to promote client selection of healthier options. Onsite support by a registered dietitian is included.

OTHERWaitlist Control

Normal food pantry use for duration of the 9-month study period. Control pantries will have access to the Healthy Pantry Program after study is completed.

Sponsors

Greater Boston Food Bank
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Pantry Inclusion Criteria: * maximum client-choice (clients can choose all items that they take from pantry) * operate at least once weekly * affiliated with the Greater Boston Food Bank Pantry

Exclusion criteria

* not affiliated with the Greater Boston Food Bank * operating less than once weekly * not a maximum client-choice food pantry * \>1 hr drive from Boston * \<50 clients on average per open day Client Inclusion Criteria (for cross-sectional surveys at baseline and 6-month follow up): * ≥18 years old * pantry client * speaks English or Spanish Client

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monthly change in proportion of green-labeled foods purchased by food pantries from the food bankCollected from the electronic ordering system at baseline and prospectively each month for 9 monthsMonthly change from baseline values of healthier foods purchased by pantries from the food bank in the proportion of green-labeled foods.
Monthly change in the Healthy Purchasing Score of foods purchased by food pantries from the food bankCollected from the electronic ordering system at baseline and prospectively each month for 9 monthsMonthly change from baseline values of healthier foods purchased by pantries from the food bank in a weighted Healthy Purchasing Score that includes all foods (range: 0-1, higher scores represent healthier selection)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in food availability at food pantriesAssessed at baseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline in food availability score using the Healthy Food Pantry Assessment Tool (range: 0-45, higher scores represent greater food availability)
Change in healthier food selection by pantry clientsAssessed at baseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline in pantry basket inventories of pantry clients measured by the proportion of green-labeled foods for each basket
Change in self-reported fruit and vegetable intake of pantry clientsAssessed at baseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline fruit and vegetable intake in cup equivalents measured by the Dietary Screener from the California Health Information Survey 2005

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026