Skip to content

Short Term Effect of Kinesiotaping In Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Short Term Effect Of Kinesiotaping on Pain, Functionality, and Ultrasound Parameters In Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04242381
Enrollment
75
Registered
2020-01-27
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2017-02-01
Last updated
2020-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise, Kinesiotape, Ultrasound

Keywords

Kinesiotape, exercise, ultrasound

Brief summary

We aimed to investigate the effect of kinesiotaping on pain, functionality and ultrasound parameters in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS).

Detailed description

A total of 75 patients with SIS were randomly classified into the following three groups: kinesiotaping (KT), exercise (EX) and sham-kinesiotaping (sham-KT). Each group was underwent two weeks treatment program. The patients were then evaluated in terms of pain analyzed using the visual analog scale (VAS), joint range of motion, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) questionnaire before and after treatment. In addition, supraspinatus tendon (SsT) thickness and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) parameters were measured using ultrasonography (US). All parameters were measured before and after treatment.

Interventions

OTHERCold Application

At the beginning of each treatment session, gel ice packs were wrapped in a damp towel and applied to the patients' shoulder joints for 20 minutes.

KT was applied to the deltoid muscle using the inhibition and mechanical correction technique and to the supraspinatus muscle using the inhibition technique (2 sessions with a 5-day interval)

EX treatment was administered for 10 days with 3 sessions/day. A triphasic exercise program was administered to the patients. Before starting the exercise program, the patients were instructed to not perform the movements exceeding 90° overhead. The exercise program was initiated using codman pendulum, passive joint motion range (with a 1-m stick), and posterior capsule stretching exercise. Shoulder wheel, finger ladder, and shoulder strengthening exercise with theraband were added to the exercise programs of patients with full or near total range of motion and pain relief. Exercise was administered twice a week under supervision; however, the patients were advised to exercise at home on the other days with 20 repetitions of each exercise. The patients were followed up via telephone to make sure they were adhering to their exercise programs.

OTHERSham Kinesio taping application

Sham-KT was applied in 10 cm I-shaped stripes on the sagittal plane over the acromioclavicular joint without stretching and on the transverse plane distal to the deltoid area. The kinesiotape was applied twice for five days with 2-day intervals

Sponsors

Kars State Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

All participants were assessed by the same clinician (F.B) at the baseline and at the two week after completing the interventions by visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH). KT and sham-KT applications were made by same clinician (N.M). For ultrasnogohraphic (US) measurements, the participants were sent to a clinician (D.G.K) who was blinded to the group allocation.

Intervention model description

A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* at least three positive results in the Hawkins-Kennedy, Neer, empty can, drop-arm, and lift-off tests * magnetic resonance imaging findings * age between 45 and 70 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who received physical therapy for the shoulder region within the past three months or those with a history of injections to the shoulder joint, * cervical pathologies, * clinical conditions accompanied by neuromotor or sensory dysfunction, * history of malignancy, * pregnancies, * partial or total rupture in the supraspinatus tendon, * adhesive capsulitis, * diabetes or chronic liver, or kidney failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Level4 weeksThe severity of shoulder pain (resting, activity, and night pain) in the patients was evaluated through the VAS score. A VAS score of 0 represented no pain, whereas a score of 10 represented the most severe pain; the patients were asked to mark the average severity of the pain they felt during the past week and the marked point was measured using a centimeter ruler and recorded.
Functional Status4 weeksQuick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) questionnaire: This questionnaire comprises three sections. The first section comprises 30 items: 21 items assess the patient's difficulties in performing daily activities, 5 assess symptoms (pain, activity-related pain, tingling, stiffness, and weakness), and each of the remaining 4 items assesses social function, work, sleep, and self-confidence. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1, no difficulty; 2, mild difficulty; 3, moderate difficulty; 4, extreme difficulty; 5, cannot perform at all). The total score possible through this questionnaire ranges from 0 to 100 (0, no disability; 100, maximum disability). Furthermore, Turkish reliability and validity have been performed for this questionnaire.
Joint range of motion measurements4 weeksFlexion (FLX), abduction (ABD), internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) were measured using a goniometer (saehan gonıometer - plastıc).
Ultrasonography4 weeksUS was performed using a 7.5-mHz linear probe in the B mode (Mindray-China). Supraspinatus tendon (SsT) thickness was measured at three different points (10, 15, and 20 mm) lateral to the tendon after identifying the biceps tendon in the transverse section and the average of measurements was recorded. Acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was assessed by linearly measuring the distance between the inferior of the acromion from the anterior of the shoulder and the superior of the humeral head

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026