Acute Ischemic Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
acute ischemic stroke, endovascular treatment, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, mechanical thrombectomy
Brief summary
The specific aims of this study are to: 1. Determine whether the endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke patients demonstrates promise or a lack thereof (futility) in deciding what would be the next phase III trial. 2. Determine the proportion of subjects with slight or no disability (a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0-2) at 3 months after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA and compare with historical controls who were treated with IV rt-PA to identify (or lack of) futility. 3. Determine the proportion of subjects with improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥8 points or achieving a score of 0-1 at 24 hours after the onset of stroke among subjects with acute ischemic stroke after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA. 4. Determine the proportion of subjects with angiographic recanalization on post procedure angiogram according to modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) perfusion flow categories among subjects with acute ischemic stroke after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA. 5. Determine the proportion of subjects with treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) within 72 hours and development of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 27 ±3hrs post treatment among subjects with acute ischemic stroke after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA.
Detailed description
A phase II trial is proposed to address the question whether administration of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke patients who are candidates for endovascular treatment provides any additional value. The phase II trial will treat consecutive patients who are candidates for IV rt-PA and mechanical thrombectomy with just mechanical thrombectomy alone. Such trial will generate the necessary data for a definitive phase III trial. The trial is designed based on low rate of recanalization in patients with major arterial occlusion with IV rt-PA alone and no difference in rate of recanalization or distal embolization in patients who receive IV rt-PA and those who do not prior to mechanical thrombectomy. The rates of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and cost of hospitalization are higher when IV rt-PA is administered prior to mechanical thrombectomy. The trial will determine the proportion of patients with slight or no disability (a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0-2) at 3 months after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA and compare with historical controls who were treated with IV rt-PA to determine futility.
Interventions
Participants will receive endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Participants will be assigned to receive endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* • Age: 18 through 90 years (i.e., candidates must have had their 18th birthday, but not had their 91st birthday). * Symptom onset within 4.5 hours of onset of stroke symptoms. Time of onset is defined as the last time when the patient was witnessed to be at baseline (i.e., subjects who have stroke symptoms upon awakening will be considered to have their onset at beginning of sleep). * An NIHSS ≥ 6 at the time of evaluation. Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 0-1 flow in the intracranial internal carotid artery, M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), or carotid terminus confirmed by Computed Tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography that is accessible to the stent retriever or suction thrombectomy catheter. * The procedure can be initiated according to guidelines of AHA/ASA which state that the treatment should be initiated (groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset.
Exclusion criteria
* Clinical
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Favorable Outcome | 90 days | Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2: 0, No symptoms at all; 1, No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2, Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance. The modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0, indicating no symptoms, to 6, indicating death. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Angiographic Recanalization | Within 6 hours of interventional treatment | Post procedure angiogram according to modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction perfusion flow categories: 0 = No perfusion. No antegrade flow beyond the point of occlusion. 1. = Perfusion past the initial obstruction but limited distal branch filling with little or slow distal perfusion 2. A = Perfusion of less than half of the vascular distribution of the occluded artery (eg, filling and perfusion through 1 M2 division) 2B = Perfusion of half or greater of the vascular distribution of the occluded artery (eg, filling and perfusion through 2 or more M2 divisions) 3 = Full perfusion with filling of all distal branches perfusion flow categories |
| Early Neurological Improvement | 24 hours post enrollment | National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥8 points or achieving a score of 0-1 at 24 hours after the onset of stroke. NIHSS quantifies neurologic deficits in 11 categories. Level of consciousness, horizontal eye movement, visual fields, facial palsy, movement in each limb, sensation, language & speech, and extinction or inattention on one side of the body are tested. Scores range from 0 to 42, with 0 indicating normal function and higher scores indicating greater deficit severity. |
| Quality of Life Status Using Standardized EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol Five Dimension, Three-Level) Questionnaire. | 90 days | The EQ-5D-3L questionnaire consists of 5 questions in 5 different domains and allows for responses from 1 (the best outcome) to 3 (the worst outcome) in each of five categories (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Total scores range from 5 to 15, with lower scores indicating better quality of life and a higher score indicating a worse quality of life. |
| Quality of Life Status Using EQ VAS (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) Scores. | 90 days | EuroQol outcome measurements is a printed 20 cm visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) that appears somewhat like a thermometer, on which a score from 0 (worst imaginable health state or death) to 100 (best imaginable health state) is marked by the patient (or, when necessary, their proxy) with the scale in view. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events | Within 72 hours of interventional treatment | Assessement by the investigators for all patients |
| Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage | 24 ± 3hrs post enrollment | Any hematoma within ischemic field with some mild space occupying effect but involving ≤ 30% of the infarcted area, hematoma within ischemic field with space-occupying effect involving \>30% of the infarcted area, any intraparenchymal hemorrhage remote from the ischemic field, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intraventricular hemorrhage associated with a 4 points or more worsening on the NIHSS within 24 hrs |
Countries
United States