Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Corneal Crosslinking Using the PXL-Platinum 330 for Eyes With Corneal Ectatic Conditions

Safety and Effectiveness of the PXL-Platinum 330 System for Corneal Crosslinking in Eyes With Corneal Ectatic Conditions

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04240457
Enrollment
11
Registered
2020-01-27
Start date
2020-07-08
Completion date
2023-02-18
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cornea Ectasia, Keratoconus

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PXL Platinum 330 device for performing Corneal Crosslinking in patients with corneal thinning conditions.

Detailed description

Patients with progressive keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, or at risk for post-refractive corneal ectasia will be recruited and undergo epithelial-on corneal crosslinking with the Peschke PXL-330 system using pulsed, accelerated energy delivery. Patients will undergo monitoring for 1 year, with serial measurements of corneal topography, visual acuity, intraocular pressure and visual function questionnaire assessments.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTEpithelial-on Corneal Crosslinking with the PXL 330 Platinum system.

PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke riboflavin solution. Riboflavin will be used to load the cornea, followed by UV-A crosslinking of the cornea.

Sponsors

Arbor Center for Eye Care
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomized at outset

Intervention model description

Treatment of patients with disease

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: Criterion 1,2,3 are required for all participants. Participants must also meet one or more of criteria 4-12 . Criterion 13 is relevant only for contact lens wearers Subjects who have one or both eyes that meet criteria 1 and one or more of the following criteria will be considered candidates for this study: 1. 12 years of age or older 2. Presence of central or inferior steepening. 3. Axial topography consistent with keratoconus, post-surgical ectasia, or pellucid marginal degeneration 4. Presence of one or more findings associated with keratoconus or pellucid marginal degeneration, such as: 1. Fleischer ring 2. Vogt's striae 3. Decentered corneal apex 4. Munson's sign 5. Rizzutti's sign 6. Apical Corneal scarring consistent with Bowman's breaks 7. Scissoring of the retinoscopic reflex 8. Crab-claw appearance on topography 5. Steepest keratometry (Kmax) value ≥ 47.20 D 6. I-S keratometry difference \> 1.5 D on the Pentacam map 7. Posterior corneal elevation \>16 microns 8. Thinnest corneal point \<485 microns 9. Predicted Post LASIK/PRK stromal ablation depth \<350 microns or expected keratometry \>47.2 D, or patients undergoing PRK in keratoconus suspect eyes 10. Contact Lens Wearers Only: a. Removal of contact lenses for the required period of time prior to the screening refraction: 11. Signed written informed consent 12. Willingness and ability to comply with schedule for follow-up visits 13. Contact Lens Wearers Only: 1. Removal of contact lenses for the required period of time prior to the screening refraction: Contact Lens Type Minimum Discontinuation Time: Soft 1 Week, Soft Extended Wear 2 Weeks, Soft Toric 3 Weeks, Rigid Gas Permeable 2 Weeks per decade of wear

Exclusion criteria

(any of the following are reasons for exclusion): 1. Eyes classified as either normal or atypical normal on the severity grading scheme. 2. Corneal pachymetry at the screening exam that is \<300 microns at the thinnest point in the eye(s) to be treated. 3. Previous ocular condition (other than refractive error) in the eye(s) to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications, for example: 1. History of or active corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, recurrent erosion syndrome, acanthamoeba, etc.) 2. Clinically significant corneal scarring in the CXL treatment zone that is not related to keratoconus, or in the investigator's opinion, will interfere with the cross-linking procedure. 4. Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study 5. A known sensitivity to study medications 6. Patients with nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the CXL treatment or other diagnostic tests. 7. Patients with a current condition that, in the physician's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Keratometry in Diopters1 yearAverage keratometry across the anterior topography of the cornea computed by a validated topographer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 yearMeasurement of best corrected visual acuity on the validated early-treatment diabetic retinopathy study scale. Snellen chart was used. Values closer to 20/20 indicate better vision.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pulsed, Accelerated
Following riboflavin instillation, the eye was exposed to UVA pulsed light at 18mW/cm2 for 5 seconds, followed by 5 seconds off, repeating over 10 minutes of illumination. Epithelial-on Corneal Crosslinking with the PXL 330 Platinum system.: PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke riboflavin solution. Riboflavin will be used to load the cornea, followed by UV-A crosslinking of the cornea.
7
Pulsed, Accelerated
Following riboflavin instillation, the eye was exposed to UVA pulsed light at 18mW/cm2 for 5 seconds, followed by 5 seconds off, repeating over 10 minutes of illumination. Epithelial-on Corneal Crosslinking with the PXL 330 Platinum system.: PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke riboflavin solution. Riboflavin will be used to load the cornea, followed by UV-A crosslinking of the cornea.
13
Conventional
Following riboflavin instillation, the eye was exposed to UVA continuous light at 9mW/cm2 for 10 minutes Epithelial-on Corneal Crosslinking with the PXL 330 Platinum system.: PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke riboflavin solution. Riboflavin will be used to load the cornea, followed by UV-A crosslinking of the cornea.
4
Conventional
Following riboflavin instillation, the eye was exposed to UVA continuous light at 9mW/cm2 for 10 minutes Epithelial-on Corneal Crosslinking with the PXL 330 Platinum system.: PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke riboflavin solution. Riboflavin will be used to load the cornea, followed by UV-A crosslinking of the cornea.
4
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConventionalTotalPulsed, Accelerated
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Eyes4 Eyes4 Eyes
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Eyes13 Eyes9 Eyes
Age, Continuous36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
29.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants11 participants7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Eyes12 Eyes10 Eyes
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Eyes5 Eyes3 Eyes

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 70 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Keratometry in Diopters

Average keratometry across the anterior topography of the cornea computed by a validated topographer

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some patients were unable or felt uncomfortable presenting to a physician's office for follow-up measurements. These individuals are marked as lost to follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pulsed, AcceleratedMean Keratometry in DioptersScreening51.0 DioptersStandard Deviation 9.9
Pulsed, AcceleratedMean Keratometry in Diopters3 months50.3 DioptersStandard Deviation 7.8
Pulsed, AcceleratedMean Keratometry in Diopters6 months46.6 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.9
Pulsed, AcceleratedMean Keratometry in Diopters12 months47.9 DioptersStandard Deviation 11.3
ConventionalMean Keratometry in Diopters12 months45.8 DioptersStandard Deviation 4.6
ConventionalMean Keratometry in DioptersScreening49.8 DioptersStandard Deviation 4.8
ConventionalMean Keratometry in Diopters6 months49.1 DioptersStandard Deviation 5.5
ConventionalMean Keratometry in Diopters3 months49.0 DioptersStandard Deviation 5.6
Secondary

Best Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses

Measurement of best corrected visual acuity on the validated early-treatment diabetic retinopathy study scale. Snellen chart was used. Values closer to 20/20 indicate better vision.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Patients recruited at a single center based on physician examination for corneal ectasia in one or both eyes. The first patient was screened for enrollment in June 2020, while the last patient was screened in October 2021.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreening20/25 or better0 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreening20/30 - 20/500 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreening20/60 - 20/2008 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreeningWorse than 20/2005 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedure20/25 or better0 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedure20/30 - 20/506 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedure20/60 - 20/2002 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedure20/30 - 20/506 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedure20/60 - 20/2001 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedureWorse than 20/2001 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedure20/30 - 20/505 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedure20/60 - 20/2000 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedure20/30 - 20/501 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedure20/60 - 20/2000 Eyes
Pulsed, AcceleratedBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedure20/30 - 20/501 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreening20/25 or better0 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedure20/60 - 20/2000 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreening20/30 - 20/501 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreening20/60 - 20/2002 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact LensesScreeningWorse than 20/2001 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedure20/30 - 20/501 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedure20/60 - 20/2001 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedure20/30 - 20/501 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses1 month post-procedureWorse than 20/2000 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses12 months post-procedure20/60 - 20/2001 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedure20/25 or better1 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses6 months post-procedure20/60 - 20/2001 Eyes
ConventionalBest Corrected Visual Acuity With Spectacles or Contact Lenses3 months post- procedure20/30 - 20/502 Eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026