Skip to content

Silverlon to Reduce Radiation Dermatitis

An Unblinded, Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety of Silverlon to Manage Radiation Dermatitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04238728
Enrollment
31
Registered
2020-01-23
Start date
2020-08-31
Completion date
2022-03-25
Last updated
2024-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radiation Dermatitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if a silver-nylon dressing (Silverlon®, Argentum Medical) is useful for the prevention or treatment of radiation dermatitis in patients receiving radiation therapy to the breast.

Interventions

DEVICESilverlon

silver nylon dressing will be applied daily

Sponsors

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
CollaboratorFED
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Silverlon dressing

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females, 22 years of age or older, with diagnosis of primary breast cancer (excluding inflammatory and medullary breast cancers). * Scheduled to receive short-course external beam radiation therapy (i.e., 2.0-3.0 Gy for 15-20 fractions) or conventional external beam radiation therapy (i.e., 1.8-2.0 Gy for 25-40 fractions), with or without boost dose, to the whole breast. * Not receiving concurrent chemotherapy. * Subject may have had chemotherapy prior to radiation. A minimum of two weeks is required between the end of chemotherapy and start of radiation therapy. * No history of previous breast or chest radiation therapy. * Subject may or may not have had surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy) prior to RT. (Note: Surgery is not required for eligibility). * Subjects may be currently prescribed hormone treatment or Herceptin therapy. * Subjects must be able to read, speak, and understand English language (all study forms are in English). * Subjects must be able to give informed consent. * Subjects must be willing to have photographs taken of radiation-induced skin changes in the radiation treatment area. * Subjects must be willing to wear Silverlon dressing and undergarment (i.e., bra) at all times, except when bathing/showering and during their radiation therapy session. * Subjects must be willing to complete a Silverlon Compliance Log to document the date and time that Silverlon was removed and applied each day during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of medullary or inflammatory breast cancer. * Diagnosis of tumors of the breast other than primary breast cancer (skin cancers, lymphomas, or metastatic cancers from other primary sites). * Partial breast irradiation (PBI) treatment technique is not eligible. * Concurrent chemotherapy. * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant. Pregnant females are ineligible because pregnancy is a contraindication for RT. All subjects of childbearing potential will be asked if they are pregnant or could be pregnant. The subject must respond no to continue with radiation and to participate in this clinical study. * Previous radiation to the chest or breast. * Radiation being given for palliative purposes. * Presence of unhealed surgical wounds, biopsy sites, open wounds in the breast or chest area. * Presence of breast infection. * Subjects currently on anti-EGFR (human epidermal growth factor receptor) therapy, such as Iressa (gefitinib) or Erbitux (cetuximab, C225). * Previous diagnosis of autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, or radiosensitivity disorder. * Presence of any active dermatological issues in radiation treatment area (i.e., fungal skin infection, dermatitis, psoriasis plaques, etc). * Chronic skin disease of the breast, previous breast trauma or scarring of the breast * Subjects with known sensitivity to silver or nylon. * Subjects unable or unwilling to wear Silverlon dressings and undergarment (i.e., bra) at all times, except while bathing/showering and during their radiation therapy session. * Subjects unable to speak, read, or understand English language (all study forms are in English).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With an Adverse Skin Event12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity Score2 weeksThe radiation oncologist or nurse will rate the skin reaction in the area where Silverlon dressing was applied using the RTOG scale which ranges from 0-5 with higher scores indicating worse outcome. Grade 0 No change; Normal Skin Grade 1 Faint erythema; dry desquamation; epilation, decreased sweating Grade 2 Tender or bright erythema; moderate edema; patchy moist desquamation only in skin folds. Grade 3 Confluent moist desquamation in areas other than skin folds; pitting edema Grade 4 Ulceration; hemorrhage; necrosis
Mean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment ScaleMid study-visit, approximately 2 weeksThis scoring system contains both a healthcare professions assessment scale and a patient symptom scale. The healthcare professional assessment scale (HPAS) individually scores the extent and severity of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis using a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. Erythema is rated based on the degree of color change. Dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis are rated based on the percentage of the treatment area affected by that particular reaction. The HPAS score can range between 0 to 16. The patient symptom scale focuses on skin tenderness, itching, burning, and functional activity using a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. The patient symptom scale can range between 4 to 16. The Healthcare Professional Assessment Scale scores and the Patient Symptom Scale scores are added together for a total skin reaction score. The total skin reaction score can range between 4 to 32. The higher the score, the worse the skin reaction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

111 patient screened. 41 were ineligible. 31 were not approached because they already started radiation therapy or were undergoing chemotherapy or surgery. 39 were approached. 1 screen failed and 31 consented and started the intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Silverlon Arm
Silverlon: silver nylon dressing will be applied daily
31
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSilverlon Arm
Age, Continuous57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With an Adverse Skin Event

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Silverlon ArmNumber of Participants With an Adverse Skin Event1 Participants
Secondary

Mean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale

This scoring system contains both a healthcare professions assessment scale and a patient symptom scale. The healthcare professional assessment scale (HPAS) individually scores the extent and severity of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis using a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. Erythema is rated based on the degree of color change. Dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis are rated based on the percentage of the treatment area affected by that particular reaction. The HPAS score can range between 0 to 16. The patient symptom scale focuses on skin tenderness, itching, burning, and functional activity using a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. The patient symptom scale can range between 4 to 16. The Healthcare Professional Assessment Scale scores and the Patient Symptom Scale scores are added together for a total skin reaction score. The total skin reaction score can range between 4 to 32. The higher the score, the worse the skin reaction.

Time frame: Mid study-visit, approximately 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Silverlon ArmMean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale6.31 score on a scale
Secondary

Mean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale

This scoring system contains both a healthcare professions assessment scale and a patient symptom scale. The healthcare professional assessment scale (HAPS) individually scores the extent and severity of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis using a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. Erythema is rated based on the degree of color change. Dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis are rated based on the percentage of the treatment area affected by that particular reaction. The HPAS score can range between 0 to 16. The patient symptom scale focuses on skin tenderness, itching, burning, and functional activity using a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. The patient symptom scale can range between 4 to 16. The Healthcare Professional Assessment Scale scores and the Patient Symptom Scale scores are added together for a total skin reaction score. The total skin reaction score can range between 4 to 32. The higher the score, the worse the skin reaction.

Time frame: End of radiation therapy, approximately 4.5 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Silverlon ArmMean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale10.77 score on a scale
Secondary

Mean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale

This scoring system contains both a healthcare professions assessment scale and a patient symptom scale. The healthcare professional assessment scale (HPAS) individually scores the extent and severity of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis using a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. Erythema is rated based on the degree of color change. Dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and necrosis are rated based on the percentage of the treatment area affected by that particular reaction. The HPAS score can range between 0 to 16. The patient symptom scale focuses on skin tenderness, itching, burning, and functional activity using a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. The patient symptom scale can range between 4 to 16. The Healthcare Professional Assessment Scale scores and the Patient Symptom Scale scores are added together for a total skin reaction score. The total skin reaction score can range between 4 to 32. The higher the score, the worse the skin reaction.

Time frame: 2 weeks post radiation therapy, approximately 6.5 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Silverlon ArmMean Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale8.63 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity Score

The radiation oncologist or nurse will rate the skin reaction in the area where Silverlon dressing was applied using the RTOG scale which ranges from 0-5 with higher scores indicating worse outcome. Grade 0 No change; Normal Skin Grade 1 Faint erythema; dry desquamation; epilation, decreased sweating Grade 2 Tender or bright erythema; moderate edema; patchy moist desquamation only in skin folds. Grade 3 Confluent moist desquamation in areas other than skin folds; pitting edema Grade 4 Ulceration; hemorrhage; necrosis

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: 30 patients completed the 2 week timepoint of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Silverlon ArmNumber of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity ScoreGrade 01 Participants
Silverlon ArmNumber of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity ScoreGrade 120 Participants
Silverlon ArmNumber of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity ScoreGrade 29 Participants
Silverlon ArmNumber of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity ScoreGrade 30 Participants
Silverlon ArmNumber of Participants With Each Grade of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity ScoreGrade 40 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026