Skip to content

Source-monitoring & Psychosis

Source-monitoring Processes and Risk for Psychosis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04236531
Acronym
SOURIPSY
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-01-22
Start date
2021-05-17
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2022-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychosis

Keywords

source-monitoring, at-risk, MRI, neuroimaging

Brief summary

Source-monitoring is a cognitive process that refers to the ability to remember the source of an information. Some studies have showed source-monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia as well as in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and in first-episode psychosis patients (FEP). Source-monitoring deficits have thus been proposed as a potential early risk factor for psychosis. However, further studies are needed to better characterize this deficit. The aim of this project is to investigate source-monitoring performances in UHR, FEP patients and healthy controls (HC) and to characterize these deficits in terms of brain anatomy, basic auditory processes and social functioning.

Detailed description

Ninety participants will be included in the study: 30 UHR, 30 FEP and 30 healthy controls. All the participants will complete a standardized source-monitoring task, an MRI acquisition (3D-T1 anatomical scan), a tone-matching task as well as a socio-demographic and clinical evaluation including an assessment of the social functioning.

Interventions

OTHERCognitive tests and neuroimaging

comparison of cognitive performances and brain anatomy

Sponsors

Hôpital le Vinatier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Three groups of participants will be recruited: individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, first-episode psychosis patients and healthy controls.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men and Women aged between 18 and 30 * Having given their written informed consent * French speakers and readers * Absence of hearing impairments (or tinnitus) that could prevent the successful completion of tasks involving listening to sounds or words * Absence of visual impairments that could prevent the successful completion of tasks involving reading on the screen * For the healthy control group, no history of previous diagnosed psychiatric disorders (according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - DSM5), absence of relatives diagnosed with spectrum disorder schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (DSM5), absence of psychotic prodromes measured by a score of less than 6 in the prodromal questionnaire - PQ-16 (Ising et al., 2012), absence of drug treatments (except oral contraception). * For the UHR group, meeting the UHR criteria according to the Comprehensive Assessment of at-risk mental state (CAARMS). * For the FEP group, presenting with daily psychotic symptoms for at least a week.

Exclusion criteria

* Do not consent to be included in the study * Contraindication to MRI scan * History of neurological disease * Pregnancy * Being under tutorship or curatorship * Having developed musical abilities (that is, regularly practicing a musical instrument)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Source-monitoring performancesone dayScores obtained at a source-monitoring task (Brunelin et al., 2006)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grey matter volumeone dayGrey matter volume will be assessed with a structural MRI scan (3D-T1) followed by morphometry analyses.
Brain gyrificationone dayBrain gyrification will be assessed with a structural MRI scan (3D-T1) followed by gyrification analyses.
Confidence in source-monitoring judgementsone dayConfidence in source-monitoring judgements will be measured using a visual analogue scale (0-100)
Working memory performancesone dayscores at a working memory task (Barrouillet et al., 2004)
Social functioningone dayscore at the personal and social performance scale (0-100)
Basic auditory performancesone dayscores at the Tone Matching Task (Strous et al., 1995)

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLydie sartelet
lydie.sartelet@ch-le-vinatier.fr0437915531

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026