Skip to content

Cold Knife Versus Monopolar Electrosurgery in Abdominal Incisions

Cold Knife Versus Monopolar Electrosurgery for Abdominal Incisions ( Clinical Trial )

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04236401
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-01-22
Start date
2020-03-31
Completion date
2021-05-31
Last updated
2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Electrosurgery Versus Scalpel

Keywords

electrosurgery, scalpel, abdominal incision

Brief summary

the aim of work is to compare the early postoperative and late term wound complication rates between the scalpel and electrosurgery in patients with benign gynecological conditions undergoing abdominal incisions.

Detailed description

• Study Hypothesis: - Using electrosurgery decrease incision blood loss, decrease postoperative pain, decrease wound time incision, decrease analgesia requirements, doesn't increase wound sepsis. Type of study: - Randomized controlled trial study (parallel group study with 1:1 randomization) will be conducted at gynecology department of Alzhraa University Hospital of faculty of Medicine for girls - Cairo within 1 year according to sample size. A computer randomization will be generated and held with one of the experimenter, and (n) of black and red card will be used for allocation concealment. Participants at morning of the operation will be given information about the study aims and written consent will be taken.

Interventions

PROCEDUREelectrosurgery will be used for abdominal incision

electrosurgery will be used to open anterior abdominal wall and electrosurgery will be used for heamostasis also

PROCEDUREscalpel will be used for abdominal incision

scalpel will be used for abdominal wall incision and thread will be used for haemostsis

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients scheduled for elective gynecological abdominal surgeries for benign diseases * willing to participate in the study. * The participants will receive 2 gm cephalosporines preoperative per hospital policy.

Exclusion criteria

* History of receiving antibiotics during the preceding 7 days, * chronic medical illness like diabetes, asthma or tuberculosis, * patients have anemia, * surgically scarred tissues, * Immuno-compromised patients, * pregnant patients, * patients with pacemaker device, * patients on anticoagulants therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound incision timeat the beginning of each surgerymeasure time needed to open anterior abdominal wall in minutes by stopwatch
Wound infectionafter surgery till primary healing of the wound, an average of 15 days after operationrate of infection in wound after surgery as inflammation, seroma, heamatoma, gapping, sepsis or fever

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain (pain score 2-4 hr postoperative).during first 4 hours after surgeryusing Visual Analogue Scale; the higher scores mean worse outcome
Amount of Analgesia needed during 1st 12 hr after surgery .first 12 hours after surgerydose of analgesia needed
Wound-related blood lossafter opening anterior abdominal wall during each surgeryby weighing towel before and after abdominal wall incision / grams
number of participants with bad scar formation or keloidthrough study completion, an average of 1.25 yearscar condition evaluation after complete healing of the wound. early healing after 15 days of the surgery and after complete healing after 45 days of the surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026