Skip to content

EU Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Venclose System for Saphenous Vein Incompetence

EU Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Venclose System for Saphenous Vein Incompetence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04236245
Enrollment
25
Registered
2020-01-22
Start date
2020-05-11
Completion date
2021-08-02
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Keywords

GSV, superficial vein reflux, venous reflux, venous insufficiency, varicose veins

Brief summary

This is a prospective, non-randomized study in which patients who meet eligibility criteria and consent to participate will undergo a minimally invasive procedure using radiofrequency (RF) energy for ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

Detailed description

Subjects who meet eligibility criteria will undergo a procedure using the Venclose Radiofrequency (RF) System to treat the great saphenous vein. The technique involves percutaneous access and insertion of the endovenous sectional radiofrequency (EVSRF™) catheter into the target vein under ultrasound guidance and relies on the use of local anesthesia and thermal energy, from a radiofrequency generator, applied to the target vein. After each treatment, the EVSRF™ catheter is withdrawn a single length of the heating coil and another treatment is performed, until the entire vessel has been treated. After the treatment procedure, subjects will be evaluated four (4) times to assess vein recanalization and reflux, and to determine the incidence of adverse events.

Interventions

DEVICEVenclose RF System

Treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) using Venclose RF System

Sponsors

Venclose, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is male or female and 18 to 80 years old (inclusive) at time of enrollment (signing of consent). * Subject has significant venous reflux by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS), defined as reverse flow with reflux duration greater than 0.5 seconds after the Valsalva maneuver or distal augmentation while the patient is standing or in reverse Trendelenburg position. * Subject is eligible for endovascular treatment, as determined by the treating investigator. * Subject's general physical condition allows for a significant amount of ambulation after the procedure, as determined by the treating investigator. * Subject is willing and able to complete study requirements, including all follow-up visits and assessments. * Subject voluntarily provides written informed consent to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

* There is evidence of old or fresh thrombus in the subject's diseased vein segment to be treated, as determined by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) within 2 weeks prior to the index procedure. * In the judgment of the treating investigator heat energy delivery to the subject would be contraindicated. * Subject is concurrently participating in another interventional clinical trial. * Subject is pregnant or plans to be pregnant or lactating at the time of the treatment procedure. * Subject has known or suspected allergies or contraindications to any general or local anesthetic agents and/or any antibiotic medication that cannot be adequately pre-treated.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vein Occlusion Rate3 daysPercentage of limbs with occlusion of the treated vein
Reflux-free Rate3 daysPercentage of limbs without reflux in the treated vein

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationBaselineClinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease (Scale C0-C6: MIN: C0=no visible or palpable signs of venous disease; MAX: C6=active venous ulcer)
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)BaselineAssessment of venous disease (Scale 0-30: MIN=0 (least severe); MAX=30 (most severe))
Presence of Complications From GSV Interventionup to 3 daysNumber of limbs that presented with the listed complications and side effects resulting from the GSV intervention

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Venclose RF System
Treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) using Venclose RF System Venclose RF System: Treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) using Venclose RF System
25
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVenclose RF System
Age, Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Reflux-free Rate

Percentage of limbs without reflux in the treated vein

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateNo reflux along treated GSV28 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateReflux along treated GSV1 Limbs
Primary

Reflux-free Rate

Percentage of limbs without reflux in the treated vein

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateNo reflux along treated GSV28 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateReflux along treated GSV1 Limbs
Primary

Reflux-free Rate

Percentage of limbs without reflux in the treated vein

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateNo reflux along treated GSV28 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateReflux along treated GSV1 Limbs
Primary

Reflux-free Rate

Percentage of limbs without reflux in the treated vein

Time frame: 3 days

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateNo reflux along treated GSV29 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemReflux-free RateReflux along treated GSV0 Limbs
Primary

Vein Occlusion Rate

Percentage of limbs with occlusion of the treated vein

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Occlusion28 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateSegmental Recanalization1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Recanalization0 Limbs
Primary

Vein Occlusion Rate

Percentage of limbs with occlusion of the treated vein

Time frame: 3 days

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Occlusion29 limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateSegmental Recanalization0 limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Recanalization0 limbs
Primary

Vein Occlusion Rate

Percentage of limbs with occlusion of the treated vein

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Occlusion28 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateSegmental Recanalization1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Recanalization0 Limbs
Primary

Vein Occlusion Rate

Percentage of limbs with occlusion of the treated vein

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Occlusion28 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateSegmental Recanalization1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemVein Occlusion RateComplete Recanalization0 Limbs
Secondary

Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification

Clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease (Scale C0-C6: MIN: C0=no visible or palpable signs of venous disease; MAX: C6=active venous ulcer)

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC0: No visible or palpable signs of venous disease1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC1: Telangiectasies or reticular veins19 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC2: Varicose veins5 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC3: Edema1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4a: Pigmentation or eczema2 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC5: Healed venous ulcer1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC6: Active venous ulcer0 Limbs
Secondary

Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification

Clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease (Scale C0-C6: MIN: C0=no visible or palpable signs of venous disease; MAX: C6=active venous ulcer

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC0: No visible or palpable signs of venous disease1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC1: Telangiectasies or reticular veins11 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC2: Varicose veins10 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC3: Edema4 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4a: Pigmentation or eczema2 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC5: Healed venous ulcer1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC6: Active venous ulcer0 Limbs
Secondary

Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification

Clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease (Scale C0-C6: MIN: C0=no visible or palpable signs of venous disease; MAX: C6=active venous ulcer)

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4a: Pigmentation or eczema2 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC5: Healed venous ulcer1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC6: Active venous ulcer0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC0: No visible or palpable signs of venous disease1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC1: Telangiectasies or reticular veins21 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC2: Varicose veins3 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC3: Edema1 Limbs
Secondary

Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification

Clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease (Scale C0-C6: MIN: C0=no visible or palpable signs of venous disease; MAX: C6=active venous ulcer)

Time frame: 3 days

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC0: No visible or palpable signs of venous disease0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC1: Telangiectasies or reticular veins1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC2: Varicose veins0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC3: Edema24 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4a: Pigmentation or eczema3 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4b: Lipdermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC6: Active venous ulcer0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC5: Healed venous ulcer1 Limbs
Secondary

Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification

Clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease (Scale C0-C6: MIN: C0=no visible or palpable signs of venous disease; MAX: C6=active venous ulcer)

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC0: No visible or palpable signs of venous disease0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC1: Telangiectasies or reticular veins0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC2: Varicose veins0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC3: Edema24 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4a: Pigmentation or eczema4 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC5: Healed venous ulcer1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemClinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) ClassificationC6: Active venous ulcer0 Limbs
Secondary

Presence of Complications From GSV Intervention

Number of limbs that presented with the listed complications and side effects resulting from the GSV intervention

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to local anesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to device0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionVein perforation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionThermal skin injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSkin discoloration or pigmentation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionInfection0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionNeurological injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionParesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSuperficial venous thrombophlebitis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEcchymosis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionHematoma0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionErythema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEHIT II (non-occlusive DVT)0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEdema0 Limbs
Secondary

Presence of Complications From GSV Intervention

Number of limbs that presented with the listed complications and side effects resulting from the GSV intervention

Time frame: up to 3 days

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to local anesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to device0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionVein perforation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionThermal skin injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSkin discoloration or pigmentation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionInfection0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionNeurological injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionParesthesia1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSuperficial venous thrombophlebitis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEdema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEcchymosis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionHematoma0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionErythema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEHIT II (non-occlusive DVT)1 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)0 Limbs
Secondary

Presence of Complications From GSV Intervention

Number of limbs that presented with the listed complications and side effects resulting from the GSV intervention

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionHematoma0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to local anesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to device0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionVein perforation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionThermal skin injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSkin discoloration or pigmentation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionInfection0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionNeurological injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionParesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSuperficial venous thrombophlebitis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEdema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEcchymosis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionErythema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEHIT II (non-occlusive DVT)0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)0 Limbs
Secondary

Presence of Complications From GSV Intervention

Number of limbs that presented with the listed complications and side effects resulting from the GSV intervention

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to local anesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionAllergic reaction to device0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionVein perforation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionThermal skin injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSkin discoloration or pigmentation0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionInfection0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionNeurological injury0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionParesthesia0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionSuperficial venous thrombophlebitis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEdema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEcchymosis0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionHematoma0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionErythema0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionEHIT II (non-occlusive DVT)0 Limbs
Venclose RF SystemPresence of Complications From GSV InterventionDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)0 Limbs
Secondary

Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

Assessment of venous disease (Scale 0-30: MIN=0 (least severe); MAX=30 (most severe))

Time frame: 3 days

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venclose RF SystemVenous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

Assessment of venous disease (Scale 0-30: MIN=0 (least severe); MAX=30 (most severe))

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venclose RF SystemVenous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

Assessment of venous disease (Scale 0-30: MIN=0 (least severe); MAX=30 (most severe))

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venclose RF SystemVenous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

Assessment of venous disease (Scale 0-30: MIN=0 (least severe); MAX=30 (most severe))

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venclose RF SystemVenous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

Assessment of venous disease (Scale 0-30: MIN=0 (least severe); MAX=30 (most severe))

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Twenty-five subjects were treated, 4 of whom were treated bilaterally, for a total of 29 limbs treated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venclose RF SystemVenous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026