Skip to content

Comparison of the Effects of TENS and CTM on Primary Dysmenorrhea

Comparison of the Effects of High-frequency TENS and Connective Tissue Manipulation on the Primary Dysmenorrhea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04235595
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-01-22
Start date
2015-09-01
Completion date
2016-08-30
Last updated
2020-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Dysmenorrhea

Keywords

Primary dysmenorrhea, Connective tissue manipulation (CTM), Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Pain

Brief summary

this study was to compare the early and short-term effects of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus connective tissue manipulation (CTM) in participants with primary dysmenorrhea. Half of the participants received CTM, while the other half received TENS.

Detailed description

CTM and TENS each relieve dysmenorrhea pain, but they do so by different. The electrotherapy modality that is most commonly used in the treatment of dysmenorrhea is TENS. It has been reported in studies that high-frequency TENS is more effective in reducing pain than either low-frequency TENS or placebo TENS. A scan of the literature reveals that although there are differing opinions and applications related to the number and duration of CTM, it has been shown that women with primary dysmenorrhea experience reduced pain after CTM,

Interventions

The application was delivered with the participant in a sitting position, with the entire back and sacral regions left exposed. The treatment was administered to the sacral, lower thoracic and pelvic regions.

OTHERTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

TENS was administered with the participant lying face down with a flat cushion underneath the abdomen. TENS was administered via 2 channels of electrodes placed with the sacral region in the middle. The intensity of the current was increased until the participant felt it.

Sponsors

Izmir Bakircay University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* being between the ages of 18-30 * having a diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea

Exclusion criteria

* having used an oral contraceptive in the last 3 months, * having an active sexual life, * pregnancy, * having gone through childbirth, * having a neurological deficit, * any kind of systemic condition, * a diagnosed gynecological condition (pelvic inflammatory diseases, endometriosis, uterus cancers, ovarian cysts, etc.), * taking psychotherapeutic drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Pain SeverityChange from Pain severity at 3 monthsTo determine the localization of pain, the participants were asked to point out and mark the place(s) they felt the most pain on a body diagram. The severity of the pain of dysmenorrhea was assessed on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Sleep Disorders and FatigueChange from Sleep Disorders and Fatigue severity at 3 monthsA 10cm VAS was used to assess the severity of sleep disorder and fatigue in the cases of dysmenorrhea.
Assessment of Depressive SymptomsChange from Beck Depression Inventory score at 3 monthsThe Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used in order to identify the risk participants faced in terms of depression and the level of their depressive symptoms. The inventory contains 21 categories, each having 4 choices to mark. The items score between 0-3. The total possible score is 0-63. A score of 0-9 is defined as relating to depressive symptoms at a minimal level, a score of 10-16 to slight depressive symptoms, 17-29 to moderate depressive symptoms, 30-63 to severe depressive symptoms.
Assessment of AnxietyChange from Beck Anxiety Inventory score at 3 monthsThe Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was used to assess anxiety. This inventory consists of 21 categories, each item being scored on a scale of 0-3. The total possible score on the inventory is 0-63. A score of 0-17 is defined as indicating low, 18-24 as indicating moderate, and a score of 25 and over as indicating a high level of anxiety
Assessment of General Health StatusChange from General Health Questionnaire score at 3 monthsThe General Health Questionnaire (GHA-28) was used in order to learn the general health status of the participants during their menstrual cycles. The 28-item questionnaire we used in the study assesses the psychological symptoms experienced in the last week. The questionnaire contains four sub-divisions of seven items each. The minimum score on the scale is 0; maximum is 84. Higher scores indicate a state of poor health.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026