Skip to content

Comparison of Pinless Navigation and Conventional Method in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of the Radiographic Outcomes and Total Blood Loss Between Pinless Navigation and Conventional Method in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04235283
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-01-21
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty, pinless, navigation, alignment, minimal invasive

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the accuracy of prosthesis, radiographic alignment, total blood loss, the risk of venous thromboembolism between pinless-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and traditional TKA.

Detailed description

Minimal invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) is an excellent surgical procedure for patients with end-stage knee diseases and can reduce the postoperative complications compared with traditional TKA procedures. However, MIS-TKA procedures require a long learning curve to avoid malposition of prosthesis. In previous studies have demonstrated that the position of prosthesis and the postoperative mechanical axis are critical factors of outcome. Malposition of prosthesis and deviation more than 3 degrees of mechanical axis will lead to asymmetrical tibia-femoral tracking between prosthesis with the wear of linear, and increase the incidence of prosthesis loosening. Computer navigation assisted system has been used in TKA procedures for more than one decade and has been proven to improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement and postoperative mechanical alignment. Moreover, navigated TKA avoids the use of intramedullary guide and preserve the medullary cavity of femur, so the risks of bleeding and venous thromboembolism are reduced. However, traditional navigation system requires additional procedure to set reference arrays with pin fixation of femur and tibia. Pin wound complications including bleeding, infection, and iatrogenic fracture were reported. Moreover, traditional navigation system requires conventional TKA approach in which the wound length of the knee will be as long as 15 to 20 cm. Therefore a combination of new navigation system with a MIS technique to perform TKA procedure is required The new pinless navigated system for TKA procedures has been developed, as the navigation tools were fixed in the surgical field without additional pin wounds. This advantage meets the rationale of MIS-TKA to take care of both minimal invasive procedures and accuracy of prosthesis placement. Therefore, the investigators want to investigate the application of this pinless navigation system in MIS-TKA procedures. Our purpose is to conduct a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the accuracy of prosthesis, radiographic alignment, total blood loss, the risk of venous thromboembolism between pinless-navigated MIS-TKA and traditional MIS-TKA. Material and Methods: The investigators plan to enroll 100 patients who plan to undergo unilateral primary MIS-TKA and will be randomly assigned into two groups. The first group (50 patients) will be treated by pinless-navigation (Stryker, OrthoMap Express Knee Navigation) MIS-TKA, and the second group (50 patients) will undergo traditional MIS-TKA. The investigators will record the surgical wound length, surgical time cost and calculate daily hemoglobin drainage and total blood loss after TKA procedures for all patients. At 3 months after operation, the whole leg scanography, AP and lat view of knee radiography will be take and the mechanical alignment (MA), anatomic alignment (AA), femoral bowing angle (FBA), and coronal femoral-component angle (CFA), coronal tibia-component angle (CTA) in coronary view and sagittal femoral component angle (SFA), sagittal tibial component angle (STA) in lateral view will be measured. The operating time and surgical wound length in knee full extension will be recorded. All complications including bleedings, wound complications, venous thromboembolism will be recorded. Study year: one year Expecting Result The investigators anticipate that the position of prosthesis in pinless-navigated MIS-TKA is more accurate or equal to traditional MIS-TKA group. And the total blood loss in pinless-navigated MIS-TKA is less than traditional MIS-TKA group. The complication rate is similar between the two groups

Interventions

DEVICEPrimary total knee replacement by pinless navigation (Orthomap Express,Stryker, Michigan)

The varus/valgus, extension/flexion, thickness of distal cut of femur was determined and done by pinless navigation system. After cutting, the instant information of resection level can show on the display screen. If the alignment is satisfying, the anterior/posterior femoral cut, chamfer cut and box resection were done by conventional jig

PROCEDUREPrimary total knee replacement by traditional jig and minimally invasive technique

The femoral alignment was determined by intramedullary guide. The femoral alignment jig was set to 5-7 degree valgus dependent on the preoperative radiograph. A bone plug is impacted into the entry hole of femoral medullary canal before prosthesis placement.

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This study proposed 1:1 randomization into pinless navigation and conventional technique. Each patient who enrolled in this study will be given sequence study number, and the chief surgeon will draw lots to decide which group will be assigned in. The patient and the independent reviewer are kept blinded

Intervention model description

Enroll 100 patients who plan to undergo unilateral primary MIS-TKA and will be randomly assigned into two groups. The first group (50 patients) will be treated by pinless-navigation (Stryker, OrthoMap Express Knee Navigation) MIS-TKA, and the second group (50 patients) will undergo traditional MIS-TKA.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee secondary to degeneration, inflammatory arthritis, gouty arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, and undergoing primary unilateral minimally invasive TKA 2. Age \> 50 years and \< 90 years 3. Failure of medical treatment or rehabilitation. 4. Hemoglobin \> 11g/dl, 5. No use of non-steroid anti-inflammatory agent one week before operation

Exclusion criteria

1. Preoperative Hemoglobin \<11 g/dl 2. History of infection or intraarticular fracture of the affective knee 3. Renal function deficiency (GFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m2) 4. Elevated liver enzyme (AST/ALT level are more than twice normal range) , history of liver cirrhosis, impaired liver function(elevated total bilirubin level) and coagulopathy (including long-term use anticoagulant) 5. History of deep vein thrombosis, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrythmia requiring life-long anti-coagulants, or stroke 6. Contraindications of tranexamic acid, rivaroxaban, or the excipients 7. Allergy to tranexamic acid, rivaroxaban, or the excipients 8. Coagulopathy or bleeding tendency caused by organ dysfunction, such as cirrhosis, bone marrow suppression etc. 9. Patient who have active bleeding disorder, such as intracranial hemorrhage, upper GI bleeding, hematuria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic outcome: the mechanical alignment (MA)Three months after operationThe mechanical alignment (MA): an angle between the mechanical axis of the femur and the tibial shaft axis
Radiographic outcome: anatomic alignment (AA)Three months after operationThe anatomic alignment (AA): an angle between the axis of the femoral shaft and the tibial shaft axis
Radiographic outcome: femoral bowing angle (FBA)Three months after operationThe femoral bowing angle (FBA): the angle between the distal and proximal femoral anatomical axes
Radiographic outcome: coronal femoral-component angle (CFA)Three months after operationTthe angle between the femoral mechanical axis and the femoral component
Radiographic outcome: coronal tibia-component angle (CTA)Three months after operationThe angle between the tibial shaft axis and the tibial component

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Blood LossPostoperative Day 3The total blood loss was calculated according to Nadler et al., which uses maximum postoperative decrease of the Hb level adjusted for weight and height of the patient. Total blood loss consists of amount of blood loss calculated from the maximum Hb loss and amount of blood transfused
Venous thromboembolismPostoperative Day 4perform duplex ultrasound study of both lower limbs in all patients on postoperative day 4
Blood transfusion rateThree months after operationRecord the event of blood transfusion, and calculate the incidence of transfusion
Operating TimeAfter the procedure is doneTime needed for the surgical procedure (skin to skin) is recorded
Surgical wound lengthAfter the procedure is doneThe surgical wound length at full extension of knee is also recorded
Wound complicationsThree months after operationAny wound complications including superficial infection, wound dehiscence, poor healing, etc. are all recorded

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactShih-Hsiang Yen, MD
yswings@cgmh.org.tw886-7-7317123

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026