Skip to content

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Pleiotropic Factor in the Treatment of Donor Sites

The Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Pleiotropic Factor in the Treatment of Donor Sites

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04234750
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-01-21
Start date
2019-10-17
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2020-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Conditioned Medium-derived Pleiotropic Factor in Treating Donor Sites

Brief summary

Skin grafting is a standard treatment for deep wounds, but care of the donor site after transplantation is very important. The means of accelerating wound healing can increase overall patient satisfaction. In recent years, cytokine therapy has been an important strategy to promote tissue repair.Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been considered the star cells that promote tissue repair. It works mainly through paracrine. Many biological effectors, including IGF-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), TGF-β1, and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), have been found and reported in various MSC conditioned media (MSC-CM), And play a role in promoting tissue repair and regeneration. In here, we aim to explore the MSC-CM-derived pleiotropic factor in treating donor sites and further evaluate its safety and effectiveness

Interventions

After the patient is enrolled, when the patient's condition is stable, he is ready to undergo skin transplantation. For the donor site, an electric dermatome was used to remove the skin. The two donor areas of the same patient were divided into a pleiotropic factor group and a blank group randomly. After placing a coarse mesh vaseline oil gauze, then cover a certain thickness of sterile gauze and pressure bandage.

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Mainly mild to moderate burns, III ° burn area is less than 20% (trauma factor is thermal burn); Thick-thickness skin (thickness 0.2-0.3mm), donor area and medium-thickness skin (thick 0.3-0.5mm) for the skin area study separately; Psychologically stable and able to complete the test process-

Exclusion criteria

History of clotting disorders, uncontrolled diabetes; Drug abuse, excessive drinking, malignant or autoimmune diseases, chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy; Significant local infection or combined systemic infection; Patients with severe heart, lung, liver, kidney, blood system and mental and nervous system diseases; Women during pregnancy and lactation-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wound healing rate1 monthOriginal wound area minus unhealed wound area divided by original wound area

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vancouver score6 monthsScore according to scale

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMeirong Li, doctor
meirong811225@126.com010-66936345

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026