Skip to content

Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Parenteral Nutrition

Longitudinal Evaluation of Patient Outcomes and Impact Assessment on Family Members of Home Parenteral Nutrition: New Directions for Research

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04234490
Enrollment
912
Registered
2020-01-21
Start date
2020-03-02
Completion date
2022-03-23
Last updated
2022-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parenteral Nutrition

Keywords

Intestinal failure, Quality of life, Carer burden

Brief summary

Patients with type 3 intestinal failure are completely reliant on artificial feeding and often manage this at home; home parenteral nutrition (HPN). HPN therapy is life saving for these patients. The Parenteral Nutrition Impact Questionnaire (PNIQ) is a proven tool for measuring quality of life when receiving HPN. This study will recruit HPN patients across the United Kingdom (UK) and ask them to complete the PNIQ survey at several different time points. This will assess the impact of HPN over time. Family members involved in the participants HPN care will also be asked to complete a carer burden survey (at one time point) to assess the impact of HPN on carers.

Detailed description

Providing a person with food through a vein is known as parenteral nutrition (PN) or artificial tube feeding. This process is used when nutrients from food can't be taken in by the intestine (intestinal failure). Patients with type 3 intestinal failure are completely reliant on artificial feeding and often manage this at home; home parenteral nutrition (HPN). HPN therapy is life saving for these patients. It is important to assess patients quality of life and their own reported effects of the HPN. The Parenteral Nutrition Impact Questionnaire (PNIQ) is a proven tool for measuring quality of life when receiving HPN. A recent study involving the use of the PNIQ in multiple hospitals in the UK, showed that those on fewer nights of HPN had better quality of life than those on more nights of HPN. Whilst this was useful for looking at quality of life at one time point, it is now important to assess change in quality life over time and any impact on family members quality of life. This study will recruit HPN patients across the UK and ask them to complete the PNIQ survey at several different time points. This will assess the impact of HPN over time. Family members involved in the participants HPN care will also be asked to complete a carer burden survey (at one time point) to assess the impact of HPN on carers. The study is being funded by Shire Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Interventions

PROCEDUREParenteral nutrition

Impact of parenteral nutrition on patient quality of life over time and impact on carer burden

Sponsors

Shire International GmbH
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Manchester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients: * All people in receipt of HPN including new patients * Those 18 years and over. Carers: * A family member or person involved in the healthcare of the participating patient. (We will ask patients to nominate their closest family member who in their opinion is potentially most effected by the parenteral feeding.) * Those 18 years and over.

Exclusion criteria

Patients: * Cannot give informed consent * Cannot read or write in English. Carers: • Family members not directly involved with caring for participants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient reported outcomesBaseline, five, 10 and 15 months post entryChange in Patient reported outcomes (PNIQ score) in people receiving HPN. Score from 0-20, with 0 being high Quality of life and 20 being low quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Carer burdenBaselineCaregiver burden (carer burden survey) in family members/close friends providing HPN healthcare to a patient receiving HPN. Score from 0-84, with 0 being no symptoms and 84 being very severe symptoms
Length of time receiving HPNBaseline, five, 10 and 15 months post entryAmount of time the patient has been receiving HPN (months/years)
Change in number of weekly HPN infusionsBaseline, five, 10 and 15 months post entryHow often the patient is connected to an infusion each week (numerical)
Change in number of hours connected to HPN infusions each nightBaseline, five, 10 and 15 months post entryHow many hours the patient is connected to an infusion each night (hours)

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026