Skip to content

Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy and Verapamil for Beta Cell Preservation in New Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy and Verapamil for Beta Cell Preservation in New Onset Type 1 Diabetes (CLVer)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04233034
Acronym
CLVer
Enrollment
113
Registered
2020-01-18
Start date
2020-07-09
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2024-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type1 Diabetes

Keywords

new onset, verapamil, hybrid closed loop, hcl, beta cell, diabetes, children, T1D, c-peptide, pediatric

Brief summary

Randomized trial of youth aged 7-\<18 years with newly diagnosed stage 3 type 1 diabetes (T1D) to assess the effect of both (1) near-normalization of glucose concentrations achieved through use of a hybrid closed loop (HCL) system and (2) verapamil on preservation of β-cell function 12 months after diagnosis. Participants with body weight ≥30 kg (Cohort A) will be randomly assigned in a factorial design to (1) HCL plus intensive diabetes management or usual care with no HCL and (2) verapamil or placebo. Participants with body weight \<30 kg (Cohort B) will be randomly assigned 2:1 in a parallel group design to HCL plus intensive diabetes management or to usual care with no HCL.

Detailed description

After informed consent is obtained, potential participants will be assessed for eligibility, including eliciting medical history, physical examination, and laboratory testing (including HbA1c, auto-antibody measurement \[unless positive auto-antibody results already available\], and pregnancy test for females with childbearing potential). Participants who already have positive auto-antibodies can be randomized immediately. All other participants will be scheduled for a randomization visit after the auto-antibody results are available; positive auto-antibodies are required for randomization. Eligible participants with body weight ≥30 kg (Cohort A) will be randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: HCL and placebo, HCL and verapamil, non-HCL and placebo or non-HCL and verapamil. Eligible individuals with body weight \<30 kg (Cohort B) will be randomly assigned 2:1 to either HCL or non-HCL. Randomization schedules will be separate for Cohort A and Cohort B and will be stratified by site. Participants assigned to HCL will receive intensive diabetes management with frequent contacts by study staff with the goal of near-normalization of glucose concentrations. Participants assigned to non-HCL will receive a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and diabetes management will follow usual care by their personal diabetes health care provider. Participants will be followed for 12 months from diagnosis, completing a 6 week visit timed from randomization and 13, 26, 39, and 52 week visits timed from diagnosis. Participants will have a MMTT performed, HbA1c measured, and blood drawn for mechanistic studies at Randomization, 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks. At all follow-up visits, a physical exam will be performed, pregnancy testing performed (if indicated), insulin dose (units/kg/day) recorded, and device data downloaded. Safety assessments will be made throughout the study by querying about episodes of severe hypoglycemia and DKA, and overall health. Participants already enrolled in the study and using the Medtronic 670G 4.0 AHCL may transition to the Medtronic 780G if desired. Contacts will be performed to review CareLink data and check for adverse events and device deficiencies on days 1, 3 and 5 after transition from 670G 4.0 AHCL to 780G. Prior to the 780G system becoming commercially available, study participants using the Medtronic system at 52 weeks will have the opportunity to continue using the 780G system at home until the system is commercially available OR until the CLVer trial is complete (last participant's 52-week visit), whichever comes first. Additional Procedures for Cohort A: Drug will be double blinded. Drug dose will be weight-dependent and will be escalated at 2-4 week intervals, up to a weight-dependent maximum if tolerated. Cohort A will have additional safety visits 1 week after initiation of study drug and after each study drug dose increase, to test blood pressure and pulse. Local lab measurement of aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) and creatinine will occur, and an EKG will be performed at Screening, 6, 26, and 52 weeks. Over the course of the trial, study drug dose may be decreased or discontinued if side effects occur.

Interventions

DEVICEHCL

Hybrid Closed Loop therapy

DRUGverapamil 120mg tablet

verapamil tablet

DEVICEnon-HCL

Usual diabetes care

DRUGplacebo

placebo pill manufactured to mimic verapamil 120mg tablet

Sponsors

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
DexCom, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant Inclusion Criteria: 1. New-onset stage 3 T1D within 21 days of diagnosis (timed from start of insulin therapy), with ability to be randomized within 31 days of diagnosis (time from diagnosis to screening can be longer provided all screening testing can be completed within 31 days of diagnosis) 2. At least one positive type 1 diabetes auto-antibody 3. Age 7 - \<18 years at the time of enrollment 4. Willing to have a parent or legal guardian provide informed consent and child assent 5. In a female participant with childbearing potential, not currently pregnant and willing to avoid pregnancy and breastfeeding and undergo pregnancy testing throughout the study 6. English speaking/reading 7. Able to swallow pills (tested with an inert imitation tablet in clinic prior to randomization) 8. Willing to not use any non-insulin glucose-lowering agents 9. Willing to use an insulin approved for the pump (if assigned to HCL) 10. Willing to avoid medications containing acetaminophen, and no contraindications for ibuprofen use (in case assigned to Medtronic HCL system) * Participant

Exclusion criteria

1. Ongoing use of medications known to influence glucose tolerance such as systemic steroids 2. Other systemic disease which in the opinion of the investigator precludes participation (including psychiatric illness) 3. Unwilling to abstain from use of HCL therapy for 12 months a. Personal pump and CGM use, including systems with a suspend-before-low function, will be allowed for participants randomized to non-HCL groups 4. Silent diabetes-i.e., Stage 3 diabetes that is identified by routine oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) or in the course of surveillance studies but is not accompanied by fasting hyperglycemia or classic symptoms of diabetes 5. Participation in another research study that involves diabetes care * Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
C-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)52 weeksThe primary outcome is the C-peptide in response to a 2-hour MMTT at 52 weeks. C-peptide was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following the start of the mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). This is summarized as the area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC). AUC is computed using a trapezoidal rule, which is a weighted sum of the C-peptide values over the 120 min.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage of CGM sensor glucose values from 70 to 140 mg/dL between treatment groups
Number of Participants With CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL >=70% at 52 Weeks52 WeeksPercentage of patients with \>=70% sensor glucose values from 70 to 180 mg/dL between treatment groups
Percentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksCGM sensor glucose values \>140 mg/dL between treatment groups
C-peptide AUC13, 26 and 39 weeksC-peptide AUC between treatment groups. C-peptide was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following the start of the mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). This is summarized as the area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC). AUC is computed using a trapezoidal rule, which is a weighted sum of the C-peptide values over the 120 min.
Peak C-peptide13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksMaximum of all C-peptide values during the MMTT
Number of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage where maximum of all C-peptide values during the MMTT \>= 0.2 pmol/ml
CGM Mean Glucose6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksMean glucose between treatment groups
Percentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksCGM sensor glucose values \>180 mg/dL between treatment groups
Percentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage of CGM sensor glucose values \>250 mg/dL between treatment groups
Percentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksCGM sensor glucose values from 70 to 180 mg/dL between treatment groups
Percentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage of CGM sensor glucose values \<70 mg/dL between treatment groups
CGM Coefficient of Variation6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksCoefficient of variation between treatment groups. Calculated as the standard deviation of CGM glucose values divided by the mean of CGM glucose values.
HbA1c13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksHbA1c between treatment groups
Number of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c \< 7.0% between treatment groups
Number of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c \< 6.5% between treatment groups
Total Daily Insulin Per kg6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksTotal daily insulin per kg between treatment groups
Basal:Bolus Ratio6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksRatio of basal:bolus insulin between treatment groups
Severe Hypoglycemia52 weeksFrequency of episodes of severe hypoglycemia between treatment groups
DKA52 weeksFrequency of episodes of DKA between treatment groups
Percentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeksPercentage of CGM sensor glucose values \<54 mg/dL between treatment groups

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HCL and Verapamil
Participants assigned to HCL group will initially be randomly assigned 1:1 to use either the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology or a Medtronic HCL system (Medtronic 670G 4.0 AHCL (prior to protocol version 5.0) or Medtronic 780G (starting with protocol version 5.0)). This group will receive intensive diabetes management with frequent contacts by study staff with the goal of near-normalization of glucose concentrations. Verapamil will be taken orally once per day by participants in Cohort A. A dosing scheme will be followed, using 120mg tablets or 60mg half tablets. Whether drug is active or placebo is blinded to both participant and site. \[Cohort B participants will not receive study drug. Instead, they will be randomized 2:1 to HCL or non-HCL.\] HCL: Hybrid Closed Loop therapy verapamil 120mg tablet: verapamil tablet
22
HCL and Placebo
Participants assigned to HCL group will initially be randomly assigned 1:1 to use either the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology or a Medtronic HCL system (Medtronic 670G 4.0 AHCL (prior to protocol version 5.0) or Medtronic 780G (starting with protocol version 5.0)). This group will receive intensive diabetes management with frequent contacts by study staff with the goal of near-normalization of glucose concentrations. Placebo will be taken orally once per day by participants in Cohort A. A dosing scheme will be followed, using 120mg tablets or 60mg half tablets. Whether drug is active or placebo is blinded to both participant and site. \[Cohort B participants will not receive study drug. Instead, they will be randomized 2:1 to HCL or non-HCL.\] HCL: Hybrid Closed Loop therapy placebo: placebo pill manufactured to mimic verapamil 120mg tablet
20
Non-HCL and Verapamil
Participants assigned to non-HCL will receive a Dexcom G6 CGM and diabetes management will follow usual care by their personal diabetes health care provider. Verapamil will be taken orally once per day by participants in Cohort A. A dosing scheme will be followed, using 120mg tablets or 60mg half tablets. Whether drug is active or placebo is blinded to both participant and site. \[Cohort B participants will not receive study drug. Instead, they will be randomized 2:1 to HCL or non-HCL.\] verapamil 120mg tablet: verapamil tablet non-HCL: Usual diabetes care
25
Non-HCL and Placebo
Participants assigned to non-HCL will receive a Dexcom G6 CGM and diabetes management will follow usual care by their personal diabetes health care provider. Placebo will be taken orally once per day by participants in Cohort A. A dosing scheme will be followed, using 120mg tablets or 60mg half tablets. Whether drug is active or placebo is blinded to both participant and site. \[Cohort B participants will not receive study drug. Instead, they will be randomized 2:1 to HCL or non-HCL.\] non-HCL: Usual diabetes care placebo: placebo pill manufactured to mimic verapamil 120mg tablet
21
HCL Only
Participants weighing \<30 kg at study enrollment were randomly assigned 2:1 in a parallel group design to HCL plus intensive diabetes care or usual care with no HCL. Participants assigned to HCL group will initially be randomly assigned 1:1 to use either the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology or a Medtronic HCL system (Medtronic 670G 4.0 AHCL (prior to protocol version 5.0) or Medtronic 780G (starting with protocol version 5.0)). This group will receive intensive diabetes management with frequent contacts by study staff with the goal of near-normalization of glucose concentrations. HCL: Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy
19
Non-HCL Only
Participants weighing \<30 kg at study enrollment were randomly assigned 2:1 in a parallel group design to HCL plus intensive diabetes care or usual care with no HCL. Participants assigned to non-HCL will receive a Dexcom G6 CGM and diabetes management will follow usual care by their personal diabetes health care provider. non-HCL: Usual diabetes care
6
Total113

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-HCL OnlyNon-HCL and VerapamilTotalHCL and VerapamilHCL OnlyNon-HCL and PlaceboHCL and Placebo
Age, Continuous9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Annual Household Income
>=$100,000
3 Participants15 Participants62 Participants12 Participants12 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Annual Household Income
<$50,000
0 Participants5 Participants17 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Annual Household Income
$50,000-<$100,000
3 Participants4 Participants26 Participants5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Annual Household Income
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
BMI Percentile at Randomization32 Percentile58 Percentile56 Percentile78 Percentile43 Percentile65 Percentile53 Percentile
Diastolic Blood Pressure at Randomization (mmHg)63 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
65 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
63 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
62 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
62 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
65 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
62 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
DKA at Diagnosis
Missing
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
DKA at Diagnosis
No
2 Participants15 Participants60 Participants13 Participants7 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
DKA at Diagnosis
Yes
4 Participants10 Participants51 Participants8 Participants11 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Health Insurance
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Health Insurance
None
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Health Insurance
Private
3 Participants22 Participants92 Participants16 Participants14 Participants18 Participants19 Participants
Health Insurance
Public
2 Participants3 Participants18 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Highest Parental Education
Advanced Degree
2 Participants8 Participants37 Participants6 Participants9 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Highest Parental Education
Bachelor's
3 Participants11 Participants48 Participants10 Participants8 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Highest Parental Education
Less than Bachelor's
1 Participants6 Participants28 Participants6 Participants2 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Lab HbA1c at Randomization (%)9.4 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
10.6 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
10.6 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
10.1 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
10.6 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
10.1 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
10.3 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
American Indian/Alaskan Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Black/African American
0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic
0 Participants4 Participants15 Participants4 Participants1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
More than One
0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
White
6 Participants20 Participants86 Participants16 Participants15 Participants15 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants12 Participants49 Participants8 Participants10 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants13 Participants64 Participants14 Participants9 Participants14 Participants11 Participants
Systolic Blood Pressure at Randomization (mmHg)95 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
111 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
107 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
108 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
103 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
108 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
107 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Tanner Staging
Group 1
5 Participants3 Participants44 Participants6 Participants18 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Tanner Staging
Group 2-5
1 Participants22 Participants69 Participants16 Participants1 Participants17 Participants12 Participants
Time Since Diagnosis at Randomization (days)23 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
24 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
24 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
24 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
23 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
25 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
24 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 200 / 250 / 210 / 190 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2216 / 2019 / 2514 / 2118 / 194 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 221 / 201 / 253 / 211 / 190 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

C-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)

The primary outcome is the C-peptide in response to a 2-hour MMTT at 52 weeks. C-peptide was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following the start of the mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). This is summarized as the area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC). AUC is computed using a trapezoidal rule, which is a weighted sum of the C-peptide values over the 120 min.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant randomized to Non-HCL and placebo dropped prior to baseline data being collected and was not analyzed. All other participants with at least one available measurement of C-Peptide AUC were included in the analysis model.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)Randomization0.57 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.22
HCL and Intensive ManagementC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)52 Weeks0.45 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.3
Non-HCL and Standard CareC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)52 Weeks0.50 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.31
Non-HCL and Standard CareC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)Randomization0.60 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.18
VerapamilC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)Randomization0.66 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.2
VerapamilC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)52 Weeks0.65 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.31
PlaceboC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)Randomization0.60 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.22
PlaceboC-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC)52 Weeks0.44 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: 0.8995% CI: [-0.11, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.01, 0.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Basal:Bolus Ratio

Ratio of basal:bolus insulin between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HCL and Intensive ManagementBasal:Bolus Ratio26 Weeks0.59 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
HCL and Intensive ManagementBasal:Bolus Ratio39 Weeks0.67 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
HCL and Intensive ManagementBasal:Bolus Ratio52 Weeks0.69 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
HCL and Intensive ManagementBasal:Bolus Ratio6 Weeks0.61 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
HCL and Intensive ManagementBasal:Bolus RatioRandomization0.96 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
HCL and Intensive ManagementBasal:Bolus Ratio13 Weeks0.61 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Non-HCL and Standard CareBasal:Bolus Ratio39 Weeks0.72 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Non-HCL and Standard CareBasal:Bolus Ratio26 Weeks0.85 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Non-HCL and Standard CareBasal:Bolus RatioRandomization1.0 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Non-HCL and Standard CareBasal:Bolus Ratio6 Weeks1.1 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Non-HCL and Standard CareBasal:Bolus Ratio52 Weeks0.75 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Non-HCL and Standard CareBasal:Bolus Ratio13 Weeks1 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
VerapamilBasal:Bolus Ratio13 Weeks0.89 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
VerapamilBasal:Bolus RatioRandomization1.1 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
VerapamilBasal:Bolus Ratio6 Weeks0.89 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
VerapamilBasal:Bolus Ratio26 Weeks0.72 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
VerapamilBasal:Bolus Ratio39 Weeks0.75 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
VerapamilBasal:Bolus Ratio52 Weeks0.82 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
PlaceboBasal:Bolus Ratio52 Weeks0.72 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
PlaceboBasal:Bolus Ratio39 Weeks0.72 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
PlaceboBasal:Bolus RatioRandomization1.1 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
PlaceboBasal:Bolus Ratio13 Weeks0.82 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
PlaceboBasal:Bolus Ratio26 Weeks0.75 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
PlaceboBasal:Bolus Ratio6 Weeks0.85 Daily Basal/Bolus Ratio
Secondary

CGM Coefficient of Variation

Coefficient of variation between treatment groups. Calculated as the standard deviation of CGM glucose values divided by the mean of CGM glucose values.

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Coefficient of Variation39 Weeks34 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Coefficient of Variation13 Weeks31 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Coefficient of Variation52 Weeks34 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Coefficient of Variation26 Weeks32 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Coefficient of Variation6 Weeks31 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Coefficient of Variation26 Weeks32 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Coefficient of Variation39 Weeks33 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Coefficient of Variation52 Weeks33 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Coefficient of Variation13 Weeks30 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 7
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Coefficient of Variation6 Weeks30 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
VerapamilCGM Coefficient of Variation26 Weeks30 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
VerapamilCGM Coefficient of Variation6 Weeks28 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
VerapamilCGM Coefficient of Variation13 Weeks29 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
VerapamilCGM Coefficient of Variation39 Weeks31 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
VerapamilCGM Coefficient of Variation52 Weeks32 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboCGM Coefficient of Variation39 Weeks33 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
PlaceboCGM Coefficient of Variation13 Weeks29 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboCGM Coefficient of Variation6 Weeks30 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboCGM Coefficient of Variation26 Weeks31 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
PlaceboCGM Coefficient of Variation52 Weeks33 Coefficient of Variation PercentageStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

CGM Mean Glucose

Mean glucose between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in the Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at the randomization visit and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Mean Glucose13 Weeks132 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Mean Glucose6 Weeks129 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Mean Glucose52 Weeks145 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Mean Glucose26 Weeks135 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17
HCL and Intensive ManagementCGM Mean Glucose39 Weeks140 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Mean Glucose26 Weeks152 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Mean Glucose39 Weeks161 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Mean Glucose52 Weeks167 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Mean Glucose13 Weeks140 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26
Non-HCL and Standard CareCGM Mean Glucose6 Weeks139 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29
VerapamilCGM Mean Glucose13 Weeks134 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22
VerapamilCGM Mean Glucose6 Weeks131 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23
VerapamilCGM Mean Glucose26 Weeks138 mg/dLStandard Deviation 32
VerapamilCGM Mean Glucose39 Weeks141 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23
VerapamilCGM Mean Glucose52 Weeks151 mg/dLStandard Deviation 27
PlaceboCGM Mean Glucose39 Weeks155 mg/dLStandard Deviation 38
PlaceboCGM Mean Glucose13 Weeks134 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22
PlaceboCGM Mean Glucose6 Weeks132 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22
PlaceboCGM Mean Glucose26 Weeks144 mg/dLStandard Deviation 27
PlaceboCGM Mean Glucose52 Weeks159 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-37, -14]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.7495% CI: [-25, 16]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

C-peptide AUC

C-peptide AUC between treatment groups. C-peptide was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following the start of the mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). This is summarized as the area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC). AUC is computed using a trapezoidal rule, which is a weighted sum of the C-peptide values over the 120 min.

Time frame: 13, 26 and 39 weeks

Population: 1 participant randomized to Non-HCL and placebo dropped prior to baseline data being collected and was not analyzed. All other participants had at least one available measurement of C-peptide AUC and were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementC-peptide AUCRandomization0.57 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.22
HCL and Intensive ManagementC-peptide AUCWeek 130.63 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.23
HCL and Intensive ManagementC-peptide AUCWeek 260.62 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.28
HCL and Intensive ManagementC-peptide AUCWeek 390.51 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.3
Non-HCL and Standard CareC-peptide AUCWeek 130.69 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.25
Non-HCL and Standard CareC-peptide AUCWeek 260.63 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.28
Non-HCL and Standard CareC-peptide AUCWeek 390.57 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.3
Non-HCL and Standard CareC-peptide AUCRandomization0.60 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.18
VerapamilC-peptide AUCWeek 260.77 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.3
VerapamilC-peptide AUCWeek 130.75 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.26
VerapamilC-peptide AUCWeek 390.71 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.31
VerapamilC-peptide AUCRandomization0.66 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboC-peptide AUCWeek 390.52 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.28
PlaceboC-peptide AUCWeek 130.69 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.23
PlaceboC-peptide AUCRandomization0.60 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.22
PlaceboC-peptide AUCWeek 260.62 (pmol/ml)*minutesStandard Deviation 0.25
p-value: 0.895% CI: [-0.1, 0.08]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.895% CI: [-0.08, 0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.895% CI: [-0.13, 0.09]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.6995% CI: [-0.09, 0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-0.02, 0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-0.01, 0.28]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

DKA

Frequency of episodes of DKA between treatment groups

Time frame: 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HCL and Intensive ManagementDKA1 Number of DKA Events
Non-HCL and Standard CareDKA1 Number of DKA Events
VerapamilDKA0 Number of DKA Events
PlaceboDKA1 Number of DKA Events
Secondary

HbA1c

HbA1c between treatment groups

Time frame: 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementHbA1c39 Weeks6.6 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.7
HCL and Intensive ManagementHbA1c13 Weeks6.4 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.5
HCL and Intensive ManagementHbA1c52 Weeks6.5 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.7
HCL and Intensive ManagementHbA1c26 Weeks6.4 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.6
HCL and Intensive ManagementHbA1cRandomization10.3 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.3
Non-HCL and Standard CareHbA1c26 Weeks6.6 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1
Non-HCL and Standard CareHbA1c39 Weeks7.0 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.2
Non-HCL and Standard CareHbA1c52 Weeks7.1 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.3
Non-HCL and Standard CareHbA1c13 Weeks6.5 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.9
Non-HCL and Standard CareHbA1cRandomization10.2 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.6
VerapamilHbA1c26 Weeks6.3 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.9
VerapamilHbA1cRandomization10.3 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.7
VerapamilHbA1c13 Weeks6.3 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.8
VerapamilHbA1c39 Weeks6.4 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.9
VerapamilHbA1c52 Weeks6.6 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboHbA1c39 Weeks7.0 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboHbA1c13 Weeks6.4 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboHbA1cRandomization10.2 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboHbA1c26 Weeks6.5 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboHbA1c52 Weeks6.9 Percentage of Glycosylated HemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.2
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.1, -0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.6595% CI: [-1, 0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml

Percentage where maximum of all C-peptide values during the MMTT \>= 0.2 pmol/ml

Time frame: 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed. N missing in each group are as follows; HCL (N=1 at baseline, N=3 at 13 weeks, N=4 at 26 weeks, N=4 at 39 weeks, N=2 at 52 weeks); Non-HCL (N=0 at baseline, N=0 at 13 weeks, N=2 at 26 weeks , N=6 at 39 weeks, N=5 at 52 weeks); Verapamil (N=1 at baseline, N=1 at 13 weeks, N=2 at 26 weeks, N=4 at 39 Weeks, N=4 at 52 weeks); Placebo (N=0 at baseline, N=1 at 13 weeks, N=3 at 26 weeks, N=3 at 39 weeks, N=2 at 52 weeks).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml39 Weeks49 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml13 Weeks58 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml52 Weeks45 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml26 Weeks56 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/mlRandomization60 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml26 Weeks47 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml39 Weeks38 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml52 Weeks36 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml13 Weeks50 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/mlRandomization51 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml26 Weeks44 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/mlRandomization46 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml13 Weeks45 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml39 Weeks41 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml52 Weeks41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml39 Weeks31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml13 Weeks39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/mlRandomization40 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml26 Weeks37 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Peak C-peptide >= 0.2 Pmol/ml52 Weeks27 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL >=70% at 52 Weeks

Percentage of patients with \>=70% sensor glucose values from 70 to 180 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: N missing in each group are as follows; HCL (N=2 at 52 weeks); Non-HCL (N=4 at 52 weeks); Verapamil (N=3 at 52 weeks); Placebo (N=3 at 52 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL >=70% at 52 Weeks46 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL >=70% at 52 Weeks22 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL >=70% at 52 Weeks30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL >=70% at 52 Weeks23 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.21, 0.53]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.7995% CI: [-0.26, 0.32]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%

Percentage of participants with HbA1c \< 6.5% between treatment groups

Time frame: 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed. N missing in each group are as follows; HCL (N=1 at baseline, N=3 at 13 weeks, N=4 at 26 weeks, N=2 at 39 weeks, N=2 at 52 weeks); Non-HCL (N=0 at baseline, N=0 at 13 weeks, N=2 at 26 weeks , N=5 at 39 weeks, N=3 at 52 weeks); Verapamil (N=0 at baseline, N=0 at 13 weeks, N=2 at 26 weeks, N=4 at 39 Weeks, N=4 at 52 weeks); Placebo (N=1 at baseline, N=1 at 13 weeks, N=3 at 26 weeks, N=1 at 39 weeks, N=1 at 52 weeks).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%39 Weeks33 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%13 Weeks27 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%52 Weeks28 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%26 Weeks37 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%Randomization0 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%26 Weeks23 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%39 Weeks20 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%52 Weeks19 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%13 Weeks24 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%Randomization0 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%26 Weeks31 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%Randomization0 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%13 Weeks27 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%39 Weeks30 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%52 Weeks25 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%39 Weeks18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%13 Weeks20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%Randomization0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%26 Weeks22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <6.5%52 Weeks18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%

Percentage of participants with HbA1c \< 7.0% between treatment groups

Time frame: 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed. N missing in each group are as follows; HCL (N=1 at baseline, N=3 at 13 weeks, N=4 at 26 weeks, N=2 at 39 weeks, N=2 at 52 weeks); Non-HCL (N=0 at baseline, N=0 at 13 weeks, N=2 at 26 weeks , N=5 at 39 weeks, N=3 at 52 weeks); Verapamil (N=0 at baseline, N=0 at 13 weeks, N=2 at 26 weeks, N=4 at 39 Weeks, N=4 at 52 weeks); Placebo (N=1 at baseline, N=1 at 13 weeks, N=3 at 26 weeks, N=1 at 39 weeks, N=1 at 52 weeks).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%39 Weeks44 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%13 Weeks48 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%52 Weeks42 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%26 Weeks45 Participants
HCL and Intensive ManagementNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%Randomization2 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%26 Weeks31 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%39 Weeks23 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%52 Weeks26 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%13 Weeks36 Participants
Non-HCL and Standard CareNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%Randomization1 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%26 Weeks37 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%Randomization3 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%13 Weeks38 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%39 Weeks33 Participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%52 Weeks32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%39 Weeks22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%13 Weeks32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%Randomization0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%26 Weeks25 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With HbA1c <7.0%52 Weeks23 Participants
Secondary

Peak C-peptide

Maximum of all C-peptide values during the MMTT

Time frame: 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant randomized to Non-HCL and placebo dropped prior to baseline data being collected and was excluded from the analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPeak C-peptide39 Weeks0.65 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.35
HCL and Intensive ManagementPeak C-peptide13 Weeks0.81 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.27
HCL and Intensive ManagementPeak C-peptideRandomization0.72 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.25
HCL and Intensive ManagementPeak C-peptide26 Weeks0.78 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.34
HCL and Intensive ManagementPeak C-peptide52 Weeks0.56 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.36
Non-HCL and Standard CarePeak C-peptide26 Weeks0.76 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.33
Non-HCL and Standard CarePeak C-peptideRandomization0.78 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.23
Non-HCL and Standard CarePeak C-peptide39 Weeks0.69 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.35
Non-HCL and Standard CarePeak C-peptide13 Weeks0.87 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.29
Non-HCL and Standard CarePeak C-peptide52 Weeks0.62 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.37
VerapamilPeak C-peptide39 Weeks0.89 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.36
VerapamilPeak C-peptide52 Weeks0.83 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.37
VerapamilPeak C-peptide13 Weeks0.84 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.24
VerapamilPeak C-peptide26 Weeks0.97 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.35
VerapamilPeak C-peptideRandomization0.96 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboPeak C-peptide52 Weeks0.55 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboPeak C-peptide13 Weeks0.78 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.27
PlaceboPeak C-peptide26 Weeks0.76 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboPeak C-peptide39 Weeks0.63 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboPeak C-peptideRandomization0.89 pmol/mLStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL

CGM sensor glucose values \>140 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL39 Weeks38 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 14
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL13 Weeks32 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 13
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL52 Weeks42 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 14
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL26 Weeks34 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 13
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL6 Weeks29 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 11
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL26 Weeks47 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL39 Weeks53 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL52 Weeks56 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL13 Weeks40 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL6 Weeks38 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 23
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL26 Weeks36 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 20
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL6 Weeks32 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL13 Weeks34 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL39 Weeks40 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL52 Weeks47 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL39 Weeks47 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL13 Weeks33 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 20
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL6 Weeks32 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 18
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL26 Weeks41 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 20
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >140 mg/dL52 Weeks49 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL

CGM sensor glucose values \>180 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL39 Weeks18 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 11
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL13 Weeks14 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 9
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL52 Weeks20 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 11
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL26 Weeks15 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 10
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL6 Weeks12 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 8
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL26 Weeks25 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 20
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL39 Weeks30 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL52 Weeks34 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL13 Weeks19 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 17
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL6 Weeks19 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL26 Weeks17 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 17
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL6 Weeks13 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 15
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL13 Weeks15 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 15
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL39 Weeks19 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 15
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL52 Weeks25 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 18
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL39 Weeks26 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL13 Weeks15 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL6 Weeks14 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL26 Weeks21 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 18
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >180 mg/dL52 Weeks28 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-22, -9]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.7495% CI: [-13, 9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL

Percentage of CGM sensor glucose values \>250 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL39 Weeks3 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 3
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL13 Weeks2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 3
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL52 Weeks4 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 4
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL26 Weeks2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 3
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL6 Weeks1 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 2
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL26 Weeks6 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 8
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL39 Weeks9 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 12
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL52 Weeks10 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 13
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL13 Weeks3 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 4
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL6 Weeks3 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 4
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL26 Weeks2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 3
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL6 Weeks1 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL13 Weeks2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 2
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL39 Weeks3 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 4
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL52 Weeks5 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL39 Weeks7 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL13 Weeks2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL6 Weeks2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL26 Weeks4 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time >250 mg/dL52 Weeks8 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 10
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-7, -1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.7495% CI: [-6, 4]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL

Percentage of CGM sensor glucose values \<54 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL39 Weeks0.32 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.34
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL13 Weeks0.23 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.21
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL52 Weeks0.29 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.34
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL26 Weeks0.25 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.25
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL6 Weeks0.22 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL26 Weeks0.10 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.11
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL39 Weeks0.16 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.2
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL52 Weeks0.18 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL13 Weeks0.12 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.16
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL6 Weeks0.11 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.13
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL26 Weeks0.22 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.25
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL6 Weeks0.14 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.16
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL13 Weeks0.19 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.2
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL39 Weeks0.21 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.27
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL52 Weeks0.20 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL39 Weeks0.26 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL13 Weeks0.16 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL6 Weeks0.16 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL26 Weeks0.14 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <54 mg/dL52 Weeks0.24 Percent of TimeStandard Error 0.26
p-value: 0.2395% CI: [-0.04, 0.17]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.7995% CI: [-1, 0.6]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL

Percentage of CGM sensor glucose values \<70 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL13 Weeks1.6 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.2
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL6 Weeks1.7 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL52 Weeks1.8 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.2
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL26 Weeks1.9 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.1
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL39 Weeks2.0 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.3
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL26 Weeks1.2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL39 Weeks1.2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.3
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL52 Weeks1.4 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.4
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL13 Weeks1.2 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.1
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL6 Weeks1.5 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.6
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL26 Weeks1.6 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.4
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL6 Weeks1.5 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.5
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL13 Weeks1.4 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 0.9
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL39 Weeks1.5 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.4
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL52 Weeks1.3 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL39 Weeks1.7 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL13 Weeks1.4 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL6 Weeks1.7 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL26 Weeks1.4 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time <70 mg/dL52 Weeks1.6 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: 0.3995% CI: [-0.3, 0.7]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.7495% CI: [-1, 0.6]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL

Percentage of CGM sensor glucose values from 70 to 140 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in the Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at the randomization visit and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL39 Weeks60 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 14
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL13 Weeks67 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 13
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL52 Weeks56 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 13
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL26 Weeks64 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 13
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL6 Weeks69 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 11
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL26 Weeks51 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL39 Weeks46 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL52 Weeks43 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL13 Weeks59 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL6 Weeks60 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 22
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL26 Weeks61 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 20
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL6 Weeks67 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL13 Weeks65 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL39 Weeks58 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 19
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL52 Weeks51 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL39 Weeks51 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 20
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL13 Weeks65 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL6 Weeks66 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 18
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL26 Weeks57 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL52 Weeks49 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 21
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10, 22]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.9595% CI: [-8, 14]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)

CGM sensor glucose values from 70 to 180 mg/dL between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in the Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at the randomization visit and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)39 Weeks80 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 11
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)13 Weeks84 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 9
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)52 Weeks78 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 11
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)26 Weeks83 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 10
HCL and Intensive ManagementPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)6 Weeks86 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 8
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)26 Weeks73 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 20
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)39 Weeks68 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)52 Weeks64 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 22
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)13 Weeks79 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 16
Non-HCL and Standard CarePercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)6 Weeks84 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 9
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)26 Weeks81 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 17
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)6 Weeks85 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 15
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)13 Weeks83 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 15
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)39 Weeks80 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 15
VerapamilPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)52 Weeks74 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 18
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)39 Weeks72 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 20
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)13 Weeks84 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)6 Weeks84 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)26 Weeks78 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboPercentage of CGM Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL)52 Weeks70 Percent of TimeStandard Deviation 21
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10, 22]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.7495% CI: [-9, 13]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Severe Hypoglycemia

Frequency of episodes of severe hypoglycemia between treatment groups

Time frame: 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HCL and Intensive ManagementSevere Hypoglycemia1 Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events
Non-HCL and Standard CareSevere Hypoglycemia1 Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events
VerapamilSevere Hypoglycemia1 Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events
PlaceboSevere Hypoglycemia1 Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events
Secondary

Total Daily Insulin Per kg

Total daily insulin per kg between treatment groups

Time frame: 6, 13, 26, 39 weeks and 52 weeks

Population: 1 participant in Non-HCL+Placebo group dropped at baseline and was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HCL and Intensive ManagementTotal Daily Insulin Per kgRandomization0.68 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.28
HCL and Intensive ManagementTotal Daily Insulin Per kg6 Weeks0.54 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.26
HCL and Intensive ManagementTotal Daily Insulin Per kg13 Weeks0.51 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.23
HCL and Intensive ManagementTotal Daily Insulin Per kg26 Weeks0.61 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.28
HCL and Intensive ManagementTotal Daily Insulin Per kg39 Weeks0.68 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.32
HCL and Intensive ManagementTotal Daily Insulin Per kg52 Weeks0.74 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.32
Non-HCL and Standard CareTotal Daily Insulin Per kg52 Weeks0.64 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.25
Non-HCL and Standard CareTotal Daily Insulin Per kg26 Weeks0.53 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.23
Non-HCL and Standard CareTotal Daily Insulin Per kgRandomization0.66 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.3
Non-HCL and Standard CareTotal Daily Insulin Per kg13 Weeks0.53 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.25
Non-HCL and Standard CareTotal Daily Insulin Per kg6 Weeks0.55 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.33
Non-HCL and Standard CareTotal Daily Insulin Per kg39 Weeks0.58 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.27
VerapamilTotal Daily Insulin Per kg6 Weeks0.55 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.33
VerapamilTotal Daily Insulin Per kg13 Weeks0.54 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.25
VerapamilTotal Daily Insulin Per kg26 Weeks0.57 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.28
VerapamilTotal Daily Insulin Per kg52 Weeks0.65 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.26
VerapamilTotal Daily Insulin Per kg39 Weeks0.59 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.29
VerapamilTotal Daily Insulin Per kgRandomization0.74 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.29
PlaceboTotal Daily Insulin Per kg39 Weeks0.66 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboTotal Daily Insulin Per kg52 Weeks0.74 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboTotal Daily Insulin Per kg6 Weeks0.54 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.28
PlaceboTotal Daily Insulin Per kg26 Weeks0.58 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.29
PlaceboTotal Daily Insulin Per kgRandomization0.64 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.27
PlaceboTotal Daily Insulin Per kg13 Weeks0.54 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.26
p-value: 0.0795% CI: [-0.01, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.5295% CI: [-0.3, 0.05]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026