Skip to content

Pancreatic Endotherapy for Refractory Chronic Pancreatitis

Pancreatic Endotherapy for Refractory Chronic Pancreatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04232670
Acronym
PERCePT
Enrollment
14
Registered
2020-01-18
Start date
2020-10-09
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2025-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Duct Dilatation, Pancreatic Duct Stone, Pancreatic Duct Stricture

Keywords

pancreas, pancreatic duct, ductal stone, duct stricture, ERCP, pancreatic duct obstruction, duct calcification

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) only versus EUS + endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with pancreatic endotherapy reduces pain in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic duct obstruction.

Detailed description

This is a single center, pilot, sham-controlled clinical trial of ERCP with pancreatic endotherapy for pain secondary to chronic calcific pancreatitis with main pancreatic duct obstruction. Potential subjects will undergo a comprehensive baseline assessment including Quantitative Sensory Testing, to ensure enrollment criteria are met and baseline covariates are measured. Eligible subjects will complete a 14-day run-in period. If eligibility criteria persist, subjects will be randomized to diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) + sham pancreatic endotherapy or diagnostic EUS + ERCP with pancreatic endotherapy as defined in the study protocol. Subjects will be followed by a blinded physician for the next 90 days, at which time the pilot trial outcomes will be measured. Regardless of outcomes, all subjects will be followed longitudinally for 12 months after randomization.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEUS + SHAM

Endoscopic Ultrasound

PROCEDUREEUS + Pancreatic Endotherapy

Pancreatic endotherapy may include any or all of the following maneuvers: pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy, stricture dilation using a bougie or hydrostatic balloon catheter, pancreatic stone extraction with or without mechanical or electrohydraulic lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and stent placement.

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

In addition to the participant and the investigator assessing outcomes, study coordinators involved in collecting outcomes data will be masked to the treatment assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Main pancreatic duct obstruction, defined by the presence of one or both of the following features: * Main pancreatic duct calcification with upstream main duct dilation ≥6mm. * Main pancreatic duct stricture, defined by the presence of main pancreatic duct narrowing with upstream main duct dilation ≥6mm. * Baseline average abdominal pain score ≥4 during the run-in period, based on Ecological Momentary Assessment 11-point Numeric Rating Scale * Ability to provide written, informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Symptoms attributable to a pancreatic pseudocyst or walled off necrosis * Clinical suspicion of pancreatobiliary malignancy\* * Low probability of follow-up to complete study objectives * Pregnancy or incarceration * Medical comorbidities that contraindicate the performance of ERCP * Previous pancreatic endotherapy * Current Opioid Misuse Measure score ≥9 * Does not have access to a mobile phone \* Pancreatobiliary malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain Score on the Numeric Rating ScaleDay -14 to Day 90The percent change in average daily pain score from the daily diaries during the 14-day period preceding the 90-day assessment, compared to the average daily pain reported during the 14-day run-in. The investigators employed the standardized 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to capture average daily pain with the empirically-supported anchors of 0=No Pain and 10=Worst Pain Imaginable.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EUS + SHAM
All subjects will undergo anesthesia administered sedation and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The endoscopist will assess the pancreas for parenchymal and ductal features of chronic pancreatitis and confirm the absence of exclusion criteria (such as the presence of an occult pancreatobiliary malignancy). EUS + SHAM: Endoscopic Ultrasound
6
EUS + Pancreatic Endotherapy
If randomized to ERCP with pancreatic endotherapy, the endoscopist will proceed with this intervention immediately following the completion of EUS and treatment allocation (during the same anesthesia). Pancreatic endotherapy may include any or all of the following maneuvers: pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy, stricture dilation using a bougie or hydrostatic balloon catheter, pancreatic stone extraction with or without mechanical or electrohydraulic lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and stent placement. Overall technical success will be defined by the ability to insert at least one pancreatic stent across the dominant main pancreatic duct obstruction. Technical success for pancreatic stone treatment will be defined by the ability to remove all fluoroscopically visible main pancreatic duct stones. EUS + Pancreatic Endotherapy: Pancreatic endotherapy may include any or all of the following maneuvers: pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy, stricture dilation using a bougie or hydrostatic balloon catheter, pancreatic stone extraction with or without mechanical or electrohydraulic lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and stent placement.
8
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEUS + SHAMEUS + Pancreatic EndotherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years46.5 years53 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 62 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 66 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Average Daily Pain Score on the Numeric Rating Scale

The percent change in average daily pain score from the daily diaries during the 14-day period preceding the 90-day assessment, compared to the average daily pain reported during the 14-day run-in. The investigators employed the standardized 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to capture average daily pain with the empirically-supported anchors of 0=No Pain and 10=Worst Pain Imaginable.

Time frame: Day -14 to Day 90

Population: The analysis population is the 9 participants who completed the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) at both the start of the study and at the 90-day follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EUS + SHAMPercent Change in Average Daily Pain Score on the Numeric Rating Scale-36.6 Percent Change
EUS + Pancreatic EndotherapyPercent Change in Average Daily Pain Score on the Numeric Rating Scale-53.7 Percent Change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026