Crohn's Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The reason for this study is to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of the study drug mirikizumab in participants with Crohn's disease.
Interventions
Administered Q4W
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants must have completed study I6T-MC-AMAG (NCT02891226) or study I6T-MC-AMAM (NCT03926130) * If female, participant must meet the contraception requirements
Exclusion criteria
* Participants must not have developed a new condition, including cancer in the previous study (I6T-MC-AMAG or I6T-MC-AMAM) that would pose an unacceptable risk in the trial. * Participants must not have any important infections including, but not limited to, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV/AIDS, and active tuberculosis (TB) during either previous study. Note: Participants with a history of active TB with documentation of treatment by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria prior to the originator study are not excluded from the study. * Participants must not have a known hypersensitivity to any component of mirikizumab or have experienced acute systemic hypersensitivity event with previous study drug administration in the originating study that precludes mirikizumab therapy. * Participation must not be pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in the study or 16 weeks after receiving the last dose of study drug.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Week 52 | Endoscopic Response defined as ≥50% reduction from AMAM study baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) total score. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (presence/size of ulcers, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/severity of stenosis) across 5 ileocolonic bowel segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum), with each of the 4 variables scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) per segment, resulting in 20 individual assessments. Total SES-CD score is the sum of all 20 individual assessment scores across all the bowel segments. Scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Week 52 | Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score \< (less than) 150. The CDAI measures the severity of active disease using 8 disease variables: stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extra-intestinal manifestations, presence or absence of fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. Each variable is assigned a specific weight/multiplier, and the weighted values are summed to produce a CDAI total score. CDAI total scores can range from 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Week 52 | Alternate endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD Total Score ≤4 with at least a 2-point reduction from the AMAM study baseline and no subscore \>1. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (presence/size of ulcers, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/severity of stenosis) across 5 ileocolonic bowel segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum), with each of the 4 variables scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) per segment, resulting in 20 individual assessments. Total SES-CD score is the sum of all 20 individual assessment scores across all the bowel segments. Scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. No subscore \>1 is defined as no individual assessment score \>1 across all 20 individual assessments. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Week 52 | Clinical response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was defined as a ≥30% decrease from baseline in stool frequency (SF) and/or abdominal pain (AP) score, with neither symptom worsening from baseline. SF was measured as the number of liquid or very soft stools per day. AP was scored daily on a 4-point scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. |
| Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Week 12 | Fecal calprotectin is an indicator of inflammation in the intestines with higher levels indicative of higher levels of inflammation. |
| C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Week 12 | C-Reactive Protein is a biomarker of systemic inflammation measured in the blood, with elevated levels indicating increased inflammatory activity in the body. |
| Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | Baseline, Week 52 | The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is a 32-item participant completed questionnaire that measures 4 aspects of patients' lives: symptoms directly related to the primary bowel disturbance (10 items), systemic symptoms (5 items), emotional function (12 items), and social function(5 items). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale in which 7 denotes "not a problem at all" and 1 denotes "a very severe problem." IBDQ total score is calculated as the sum of all questions. Total scores range from 32 to 224; a higher score indicates a better quality of life. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Korea, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
Eli Lilly and Company
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Eligibility for Study I6T-MC-AMAX (AMAX; NCT04232553) required completion of one of the originating studies: either Study I6T-MC-AMAM (AMAM; NCT03926130) or Study I6T-MC-AMAG (AMAG; NCT02891226). Participants from Study AMAM were classified as having achieved Endoscopic Response if they achieved a reduction from baseline in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease \[SES-CD\] total score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% at Week 52.
Pre-assignment details
(continued) Participants from Study AMAM were classified as not having achieved Endoscopic Response if they did not achieve a reduction from baseline in SES-CD total score \>= 50% at Week 52.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC Participants assigned to mirikizumab in Study AMAM who achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 287 |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC Participants assigned to mirikizumab in Study AMAM who did not achieve Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 900 mg IV Q4W for 3 doses, followed by mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 222 |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC Participants assigned to placebo in Study AMAM who switched from placebo to mirikizumab at week 12 and achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 29 |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC Participants assigned to placebo in Study AMAM who switched from placebo to mirikizumab at week 12 and did not achieve Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 900 mg IV Q4W for 3 doses, followed by mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 34 |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC Participants assigned to ustekinumab in Study AMAM who achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 138 |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC Participants assigned to ustekinumab in Study AMAM who did not achieve Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 900 mg IV Q4W for 3 doses, followed by mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 109 |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC Participants assigned to placebo in Study AMAM who achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 18 |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC Participants assigned to placebo in Study AMAM who did not achieve Endoscopic Response at Week 52 of AMAM continued into Study AMAX and received mirikizumab 900 mg IV Q4W for 3 doses, followed by mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 53 |
| All AMAG Participants: Miri 300 mg SC Participants from Study AMAG who continued into Study AMAX received mirikizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 52 weeks. | 106 |
| Total | 996 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | All AMAG Participants: Miri 300 mg SC | AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Total | AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 38.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.88 | 38.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.66 | 37.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.52 | 37.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68 | 39.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.84 | 37.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.92 | 39.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | 38.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.98 | 37.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.84 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 13 Participants | 6 Participants | 61 Participants | 3 Participants | 21 Participants | 31 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 215 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 23 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 85 Participants | 45 Participants | 154 Participants | 14 Participants | 84 Participants | 102 Participants | 26 Participants | 21 Participants | 738 Participants | 207 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 13 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 9 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 11 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 47 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 29 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 32 Participants | 0 Participants | 16 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 105 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Croatia | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 14 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 58 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 31 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 31 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment India | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 17 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 13 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 37 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Latvia | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Lithuania | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 8 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 16 Participants | 8 Participants | 33 Participants | 2 Participants | 22 Participants | 17 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 142 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 17 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 6 Participants | 8 Participants | 18 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 11 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 74 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Serbia | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 18 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Slovakia | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 14 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 17 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 51 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Turkey | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 34 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ukraine | 13 Participants | 1 Participants | 11 Participants | 2 Participants | 11 Participants | 18 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 83 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 35 Participants | 6 Participants | 26 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants | 19 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 124 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 49 Participants | 21 Participants | 88 Participants | 7 Participants | 54 Participants | 70 Participants | 11 Participants | 17 Participants | 441 Participants | 124 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 57 Participants | 32 Participants | 134 Participants | 11 Participants | 55 Participants | 68 Participants | 23 Participants | 12 Participants | 555 Participants | 163 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 287 | 1 / 222 | 0 / 29 | 1 / 34 | 0 / 138 | 0 / 109 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 53 | 0 / 106 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 189 / 287 | 138 / 222 | 16 / 29 | 21 / 34 | 82 / 138 | 69 / 109 | 12 / 18 | 33 / 53 | 68 / 106 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 19 / 287 | 20 / 222 | 1 / 29 | 8 / 34 | 9 / 138 | 9 / 109 | 0 / 18 | 7 / 53 | 3 / 106 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score \< (less than) 150. The CDAI measures the severity of active disease using 8 disease variables: stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extra-intestinal manifestations, presence or absence of fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. Each variable is assigned a specific weight/multiplier, and the weighted values are summed to produce a CDAI total score. CDAI total scores can range from 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 79.2 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 65.9 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 76.6 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 55.9 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 75.8 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 74.6 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 84.9 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 68.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
Endoscopic Response defined as ≥50% reduction from AMAM study baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) total score. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (presence/size of ulcers, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/severity of stenosis) across 5 ileocolonic bowel segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum), with each of the 4 variables scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) per segment, resulting in 20 individual assessments. Total SES-CD score is the sum of all 20 individual assessment scores across all the bowel segments. Scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 29.7 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 92.6 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 38.7 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 39.7 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 94.1 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 51.4 percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is a 32-item participant completed questionnaire that measures 4 aspects of patients' lives: symptoms directly related to the primary bowel disturbance (10 items), systemic symptoms (5 items), emotional function (12 items), and social function(5 items). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale in which 7 denotes not a problem at all and 1 denotes a very severe problem. IBDQ total score is calculated as the sum of all questions. Total scores range from 32 to 224; a higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 57.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.99 |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 46.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.32 |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 47.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 6.12 |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 38.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 5.81 |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 50.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.82 |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 49.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.29 |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 65.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 7.84 |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at Week 52 : Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 46.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 4.62 |
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
C-Reactive Protein is a biomarker of systemic inflammation measured in the blood, with elevated levels indicating increased inflammatory activity in the body.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study, and had evaluable C-Reactive Protein data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 1.4 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 2.7 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 1.4 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 3.2 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 1.3 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 3.5 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 2.3 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 3.7 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
Fecal calprotectin is an indicator of inflammation in the intestines with higher levels indicative of higher levels of inflammation.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study, and had evaluable fecal calprotectin data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 110.5 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 310.0 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 134.0 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 168.0 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 113.0 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 312.5 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 46.0 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Fecal Calprotectin at Week 12 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 333.5 micrograms per gram (μg/g) |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
Alternate endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD Total Score ≤4 with at least a 2-point reduction from the AMAM study baseline and no subscore \>1. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (presence/size of ulcers, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/severity of stenosis) across 5 ileocolonic bowel segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum), with each of the 4 variables scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) per segment, resulting in 20 individual assessments. Total SES-CD score is the sum of all 20 individual assessment scores across all the bowel segments. Scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. No subscore \>1 is defined as no individual assessment score \>1 across all 20 individual assessments.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 54.6 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 14.2 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 66.3 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 25.8 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 22.1 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 63.1 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Alternate Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 32.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study)
Clinical response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was defined as a ≥30% decrease from baseline in stool frequency (SF) and/or abdominal pain (AP) score, with neither symptom worsening from baseline. SF was measured as the number of liquid or very soft stools per day. AP was scored daily on a 4-point scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants originating from the AMAM study who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline SES-CD total score ≥7 (or ≥4 for isolated ileal disease) in the AMAM study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| AMAM Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 87.3 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 74.7 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO/Miri: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 63.3 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 86.2 percentage of participants |
| AMAM Uste: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 84.0 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 97.8 percentage of participants |
| AMAM PBO: Miri 900 mg IV Then 300 mg SC | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 52 - (Participants Originating From AMAM Study) | 78.2 percentage of participants |