Skip to content

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Platelet-rich Plasma vs Needle Tenotomy.

Great Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Parallel Group, Blind Randomised Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PRP Injection Versus Needle Tenotomy With Lidocaine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04231357
Acronym
PRP-GTPS
Enrollment
81
Registered
2020-01-18
Start date
2019-12-04
Completion date
2023-04-28
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tendinopathy

Keywords

ultrasound;platelet-rich plasma;tendinopathy;pain;trochanter

Brief summary

Great trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a difficult problem to manage and results in significant patient morbidity. This study is a single-center, randomized double-blind controlled trial. Eighty patients will be allocated to have an ultrasound (US)-guided injection of pure platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or needle tenotomy. Outcome data will be collected before the intervention, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention. Main outcome measure: percent of patients that experience a reduction of 25% in hip outcome score (HOS) (responders) at 6 months after the intervention. Secondary outcome measures include percent of responders at three and twelve months, and pain reduction (VAS) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Adverse reactions or events will be recorded.

Detailed description

Evaluation of gluteal tendon pathology, including superoposterior and lateral aspects of gluteus medius and gluteus minimus(changes in echotexture, partial tears, calcified deposits, thickness, and loss of fibrillar pattern were evaluated by ultrasound at baseline, six and 12 m post-treatment. Peritrochanteric pathology including tensor fascia lata, trochanteric bursa, and cortical irregularities were also recorded. To analyze the relationship between the possible predictor variables (including sociodemographic and clinical factors, and imaging biomarkers, such as tendon degeneration and abnormalities in the peritrochanteric space) and changes in pain (VAS score) and functionality (HOS score), multivariate analyses were performed using multiple linear regressions.

Interventions

DRUGplatelet rich plasma

platelet rich plasma prepared from peripheral blood using single spin centrifugation

Sponsors

Isabel Andia
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

blocks of four, using EPIDAT3.1 statistical program, and created aluminum paper blinded envelopes with the numbered treatment allocation. The numbered envelopes will be opened on the treatment day by the researcher who is in charge of the PRP preparation. All physicians (including orthopaedists involved in clinical outcome assessments and radiologists involved in ultrasound assessments), except one radiologist who performed the procedures, will be unaware of treatment allocation. All patients will be blinded to the treatment. Peripheral blood will be drawn from all patients, and the syringe containing the treatment will be wrapped with gauze hindering treatment visualization.

Intervention model description

Single center, superiority type, double blinded, randomised controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of both sexes between the ages of 35 and 75 years. * At the screening visit, they present hip pain at 3 points out of 10 in EVA. * Body Mass Index values between 20 and 35 (both values included). * Commitment to comply with all study procedures. * Diagnoses of chronic GTPS according to the diagnostic criteria that have been previously described. * The patient must give written informed consent. * Women of child-bearing age must obtain a negative test result of pregnancy in blood or urine and accept the use of appropriate contraception while in the trial.

Exclusion criteria

* • Body Mass Index\>35. * Presence of full tendon tear. * Systemic autoimmune rheumatologic disease (connective tissue diseases and systemic necrotizing vasculitis) * Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin above 9%) * Blood disorders (thrombopathy, thrombocytopenia, anemia with Hb \<9) * Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments * Treatment by intramuscular corticoid, during the 3 months prior to the first administration of the trial treatment. * Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (more than 10 days consecutive to usual doses), opiates or oral steroids during the 15 days prior to treatment in the study. * Severe heart disease * Patients unable to comply with scheduled visits, for work or spend long periods away from their habitual residence. * Patients with active cancer or cancer diagnosed in the last five years. * Analytical Diagnosis Hepatitis B, C or HIV infection. * Pregnant or lactating. * People who are taking a drug in clinical investigation or participated in any investigational study clinic (with an authorized or not) within 30 days prior to randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of participants that showed a clinically minimal clinically important change in function as measured by HOS (Hip Outcome Score, Activity of Daily Living Scale)6 monthsRate of participants that experience at least 25% change in Hip Outcome score (HOS) (comparing to baseline) (Hip Outcome Score, Activity of Daily Living Scale, 0 (worst) to 100 (level of activity prior to hip problem)
Number of adverse events related to treatment3 monthsDifferences in the patient self-reported adverse events related to treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of patients that experience a significant minimal clinically important change in HOS at 3 and 12 months3 and 12 monthsRate of patients that experience at least 25% change in Hip Outcome score (HOS, Activity of Daily Living Scale, 0 to 100 (level of activity prior to hip problem)
Pain changes (VAS) (0 to 10 maximum pain)3, 6 and 12 monthsPain changes assessed by visual analog scale (VAS)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026