Stiffness; Spine
Conditions
Keywords
Cupping therapy on lumbar stiffness
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to fill gaps in the literature regarding the effectiveness of cupping therapy on lumbar stiffness. Participants will be recruited from the University of South Carolina and from local clinics in Columbia, South Carolina. Individuals will be classified based on lumbar range of motion limitations, and then they will be equally dispersed into three treatment groups via stratified randomization. These groups include dynamic cupping, static cupping, or stretching. All participants will be assessed prior to selected treatment to obtain baseline values for four measures: back range of motion (BROM), pain pressure threshold (PPT), active straight leg raise (ASLR), and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Participants will be given each measure directly after treatment, followed by a follow-up measurement 24 hours after treatment.
Detailed description
Cupping therapy has become recently popular in Western culture due to affordability, lack of invasiveness, and low risk of adverse effects. However, there is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness on this treatment technique on decreasing pain and increasing range of motion. This project aims to help fill the gaps by using a larger sample size and clear methodology. The aims of the study include to determine if both static and dynamic cupping therapy have a greater effect on BROM, PPT, ASLR, and NRPS as compared to stretching, and if any changes made are maintained to a different degree over a 24 hour period based on treatment. Additional aims of the study include to determine if there is a difference between type of cupping (static vs dynamic) on these four measures. By performing this study, scientific knowledge of cupping therapy will be improved and expanded, thus impacting how it is used in clinical practice.
Interventions
OTHERStatic Cupping
Two cups will be applied unilaterally to the lumbar paraspinals. The skin will be elevated to 1.5 cm ensuring standardized pressure. Cups will remain on the treatment area statically for 4 minutes prior to removal. Another 4 minute bout of identical treatment to the contralateral side will follow. (Participants will be equally dispersed into three treatment groups via stratified randomization).
OTHERDynamic Cupping
One cup will be applied ipsilaterally, raising skin to 1.2 cm of standard pressure. The cup will be continuously moved in a sweeping motion between L1 and L5 within a defined width. This process will be repeated on the other side. Each side will be treated for 4 minutes dynamically for a total treatment duration of 8 minutes. (Participants will be equally dispersed into three treatment groups via stratified randomization).
OTHERStretching
The stretching program performed will involve a double knee to chest stretch, cat stretch, camel stretch, and pelvic tilts. Participants will receive a 30 second rest break between each of the four stretches. (Participants will be equally dispersed into three treatment groups via stratified randomization).
Sponsors
University of South Carolina
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The people collecting the data will not be aware of which intervention group the subjects were allocated to.
Intervention model description
A parallel design typically compares two or more treatments. Participants are randomly assigned to one of the groups, treatments are administered, and then the results are compared. In this study, individuals will be placed in one of three groups: static stretching group, dynamic cupping group, or stretching group.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years or older, 50 degrees or less of lumbar flexion
Exclusion criteria
* Cancer, organ failure, collagen disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pacemakers, bleeding disorders, recent fever
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Back Range of Motion | At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up | The BROM instrument will be used to measure lumbar range of motion in individuals with lumbar stiffness at initial baseline, the change in range of motion immediately following treatment, and any maintained change at 24 hour follow up. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Active Straight Leg Raise | At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up | The ASLR will be used to assess hamstring flexibility in individuals with lumbar stiffness at initial baseline, the change in hamstring flexibility immediately following treatment, and any maintained change at 24 hour follow up. |
| Pain Pressure Threshold | At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up | The Wagner Force Ten FDX Compact Digital Force Gauge hand-held digital algometer will be used to measure pain pressure threshold at initial baseline, the change in pain pressure threshold immediately following treatment, and any maintained change at 24 hour follow up. |
| Numeric Pain Rating Scale | At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up | The Numeric Pain Rating Scale will be used to assess pain in individuals with lumbar stiffness at initial baseline, the change in pain immediately following treatment, and any maintained change in 24 hour follow up. Individuals will be asked to rate their current pain level on a scale of 0-10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed