Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of NAVIO

Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Alignment of NAVIO Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blind Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04230616
Enrollment
180
Registered
2020-01-18
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2030-02-28
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and costs of the NAVIO™ system with the conventional intramedullary alignment guide for total knee replacement in a clinical setting. The hypothesis is that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the use of NAVIO™ is at least as efficient and safe as TKA with the use of conventional intramedullary alignment guiding.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtotal knee arthroplasty

total knee arthroplasty

RADIATIONCT scan

The first 52 participants will recieve a pre- and postoperative CT scan of the hip, knee and ankle.

Sponsors

Sint-Trudo Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved, as assessed by X-ray * High need to obtain pain relief and improve function * Above 18 years old * Able and willing to follow instructions * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Active infection in knee * General infection * Failure of previous joint replacement * Post-operative or post traumatic malalignment of the knee/leg * Pregnancy * Not able or willing to undergo CT-scan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in planned and achieved alignment in degrees based on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgeryDifference in preoperatively planned and postoperatively achieved alignment of both the femoral and tibial component of the prosthesis in the frontal, sagittal and coronal plane. Deviations (in degrees varus/valgus, flexion extension, and internal/external rotation) from calculated positions (of both components) to bony anatomic landmarks, used by NAVIO to align the prosthesis, will be obtained.
Difference in planned and achieved mechanical axis in degrees based on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgeryPreoperatively planned and postoperatively achieved mechanical axis of the operated leg. The mechanical axis is defined as the angle between a line from the centre of rotation of the hip to the centre of the femoral component and a line from the centre of the tibial plateau to the centre of the ankle.
Difference in percentage of outliers of alignment on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgeryPercentage of outliers in alignment (defined as \> 3 degrees deviation from positions calculated by software) of the femoral and tibial components in frontal, sagittal and transverse plane.
Difference in percentage of outliers of mechanical axis based on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgeryPercentage of outliers (defined as \> 3 degrees deviation from neutral) in mechanical axis of the of the operated leg. The mechanical axis is defined as the angle between a line from the centre of rotation of the hip to the centre of the femoral component and a line from the centre of the tibial plateau to the centre of the ankle.
Mean change in the visual analogue scale scoreswithin 6 weeks preoperative, 24 hours post-surgery, day of discharge, 6 weeks post-surgery, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryComparison is made between the two study arms, a higher visual analogue pain score means a worse outcome
Mean change in the American Knee Society Scorewithin 6 weeks preoperative, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryin a total of 50 points, stability, 25 points, and range of motion, 25 points. The maximum score of 100 points . Comparison is made between the two study arms. A higher American Knee Society Score means a better outcome
Mean change in the Oxford Knee Scorewithin 6 weeks preoperative, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryComparison is made between the two study arms, score between 0 and 48. Better score means better outcome
Mean change in the Lower Extremities Activity scalewithin 6 weeks preoperative, day of discharge, 6 weeks post-surgery, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryComparison is made between the two study arms, score between 0 and 80. The minimal clinically important difference is 9 scale points. The lower the score the greater the disability.
Mean change in the The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)within 6 weeks preoperative, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryComparison is made between the two study arms. Five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). The higher the score, the poorer the function
Difference in mechanical axis of the prosthesis between the two study arms based on Long-leg X-rayswithin 6 weeks preoperative, 6 weeks post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryPost-operative (at 6 week visit) the baseline mechanical axis will be measured as the angle between a line connecting the center of the femoral head with the center of the knee and the line connecting the center of the knee with the center of the ankle.
Difference in positioning of the prosthesis between the two study arms based on Long-leg X-rayswithin 6 weeks preoperative, 6 weeks post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryIn order to measure positioning of the prosthesis (coronal alignment), long-leg, weight-bearing, standing anteroposterior and lateral X-rays will be made
Difference in wear between the two study arms based on Long-leg X-rayswithin 6 weeks preoperative, 6 weeks post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgeryIn the long term, wear can be roughly measured by measuring again the mechanical axis of the leg and comparing this with baseline mechanical axis and by measuring the distance between medial and lateral femoral condyles and medial and lateral tibial platform respectively.
Significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two study arms1 day of discharge from the hospitalLength of hospital stay (in days) will be registered for both groups.
Operation Timeintraoperative (Time will be recorded from the moment of incision until bandage is being placed)Compare the duration of surgery between the two study arms
Significant difference in blood loss between study armsIntra-operatively until 24 hours post-surgery. .Blood loss will be measured intra-operatively and up to 24 hours post-operatively. The amount of rinsing liquid will be subtracted from the total amount collected in the suction device to obtain the amount (ml) of intra-operative blood loss. The weight of grids and compresses will be measured post-operatively and dry weight will be subtracted from this value to obtain blood loss not collected in the suction device (1mg = 1ml). On day 2 post-operative, Hb and Ht will obtained.
Difference in adverse eventsthrough study completion, an average of 10 yearsComplication registration will be done throughout the entire study period
Difference in frequency of infectionthrough study completion, an average of 10 yearsWhen infection is present, this will be noted on the complication registry form and appropriate action will be taken. Distinction will be made between superficial infections and deep infections.
Difference in frequency of trombo-embolic complicationsthrough study completion, an average of 10 yearsAttention will be focused on clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Difference in frequency of wound problemsFrom day of surgery until 5 days post-surgeryPersistent wound leakage will be registered. Persistent leakage is defined as leakage lasting 5 days after surgery.
Difference in frequency of looseningthrough study completion, an average of 10 years.Loosening of tibial or femoral components of the prosthesis as seen on X-ray.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactPeter Bollars, Dr.
peter.bollars@stzh.be+3211 33 42 86

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026