Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke, Hemiparesis, Gait, Brain-Computer Interface, Rehabilitation, Exoskeleton
Brief summary
This research will study the effects of a rehabilitation program assisted by a powered lower extremity exoskeleton in patients after stroke. It will compare clinical and biomechanical features of patients at baseline and after intervention. Additionally, it will also examine the use of a brain-computer-interface (BCI) to command movements on the powered lower limb exoskeleton. The findings will be used to improve understanding human-robot interaction, to improve the design of the robotic devices and to improve rehabilitation services.
Detailed description
Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality, morbidity and disability in adults in developed countries. Survivors may suffer several neurological deficits or deficiencies, such as hemiparesis, communication disorders, cognitive deficits and visuospatial perception disorders. Hemiplegia is a par loss of hemi-body voluntary motricity following a brain injury, usually resulting in alterations of the locomotor system with persistent disorders of movement and posture. Hemiplegia significantly affects gait performance. Gait recovery is an important objective in the rehabilitation program for stroke patients.The currently available treatment techniques include classical techniques of gait rehabilitation, functional electrical stimulation, electromechanic devices, robotic devices and brain-computer interfaces, among others.The evidence suggest that the combination of different rehabilitation strategies is more effective than conventional rehabilitation techniques alone. Technology-based rehabilitation methods such as robotic devices need more research to demonstrate their effects on gait recovery. This study will assess the effects of a rehabilitation program with a powered lower extremity exoskeleton in people with stroke. Additionally, it will also examine the use of a brain-computer-interface (BCI) to command movements on the powered lower limb exoskeleton. The findings will be used to improve understanding human-robot interaction, to improve the design of the robotic devices and to improve rehabilitation services.
Interventions
DEVICERobot-assisted training with a lower extremity powered exoskeleton (H3 Exoskeleton, Spain)
The H3 is a powered lower extremity exoskeleton with actuated at hips, knees and ankles joints. A novel control software has been design and implemented in this device, which allows selective joint movement and recording of data from each rehabilitation session.
BEHAVIORALConventional gait rehabilitation
Conventional gait rehabilitation consist in walking and other applicable lower limb exercises performed by participants with assistance of a physical therapist.
Sponsors
Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* unilateral lower extremity paresis * haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke * a minimum of six months after the acute infarction/onset of the disease * full passive range of motion in lower extremity or at least at neutral position * be able to stand freely * be able to walk with or without aid for at least 20 meters in less than 2 minutes
Exclusion criteria
* peripheral nervous system pathology * epilepsy * weight over 100 kg * no cognitive ability to follow the study instructions * pregnancy * use of implanted devices * instable lower extremity joints or fixed contracture
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gait Deviation Index Baseline | Baseline | Gait Deviation Index will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system. |
| Gait Deviation Index Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Gait Deviation Index will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Distance in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Baseline | Baseline | Measure of the distance a subject covers during an indoor gait on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test consist in a evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance. |
| Distance in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Measure of the distance a subject covers during an indoor gait on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test consist in a evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance. |
| Muscle tone measured using modified ashworth scale (MAS) Baseline | Baseline | Tests resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity. |
| Muscle tone measured using modified ashworth scale (MAS) Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Tests resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity. |
| Passive range of motion Baseline | Baseline | Passive range of motion in lower extremities. ROM will be assessed by using an universal goniometer |
| Passive range of motion Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Passive range of motion in lower extremities. ROM will be assessed by using an universal goniometer |
| 10 meter walk test Baseline | Baseline | The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function. |
| 10 meter walk test Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function. |
| Timed Up and Go Baseline | Baseline | Measurement of the time in seconds for a person to rise from sitting from a standard arm chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The person wears regular footwear and customary walking aid. |
| Maximal muscle strength Baseline | Baseline | Maximal muscle strength (peak torque, Nm) during maximal voluntary unilateral hip extension-flexion, and hip adduction-abduction (standing), knee extension-flexion (seated), respectively. Both the affected (AF) and non-affected (NA) leg. A hand-held dynamometer will be used for the assessment. |
| Berg Balance Scale Baseline | Baseline | Berg balance scale is used for functional balance. participants are asked to perform 14 tasks frequently used in daily life activities. The highest possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates better balance. |
| Berg Balance Scale Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Berg balance scale is used for functional balance. participants are asked to perform 14 tasks frequently used in daily life activities. The highest possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates better balance. |
| Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) Baseline | Baseline | FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device. |
| Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device. |
| Patient satisfaction with device: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology | 12 weeks | Measured with QUEST scale. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) is a 12-item outcome measure that assesses user satisfaction with two components, Device and Services. Scores of 1 indicate dissatisfaction and scores of 5 indicate high satisfaction |
| Medical Research Council test (MRC) Baseline | Baseline | Manual evaluation of muscle strength. This scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 0 = no movement is observed, grade 5= muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Six muscles groups are tested at both sides of the body: shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion. Maximal total score is 60. |
| Medical Research Council test (MRC) Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Manual evaluation of muscle strength. This scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 0 = no movement is observed, grade 5= muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Six muscles groups are tested at both sides of the body: shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion. Maximal total score is 60. |
| Gait Speed Baseline | Baseline | Gait Speed will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system. |
| Gait Speed Post-intervention | 12 weeks | Gait Speed will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system. |
| Timed Up and Go Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Measurement of the time in seconds for a person to rise from sitting from a standard arm chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The person wears regular footwear and customary walking aid. |
| Maximal muscle strength Post-Intervention | 12 weeks | Maximal muscle strength (peak torque, Nm) during maximal voluntary unilateral hip extension-flexion, and hip adduction-abduction (standing), knee extension-flexion (seated), respectively. Both the affected (AF) and non-affected (NA) leg. A hand-held dynamometer will be used for the assessment. |
Countries
Chile
Outcome results
None listed