Skip to content

MicroUDxTM: a Rapid Diagnostic Tool That Will Prevent Death and Disability From Common Infections

The Development of a Rapid and Accurate Method for Detecting and Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Causing Urinary Tract Infection Using a Metabolomic Platform

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04228081
Acronym
MicroUDxTM
Enrollment
10000
Registered
2020-01-14
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
2023-10-15
Last updated
2022-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection

Brief summary

Background & Rational: Antibiotics are a major underpinning of modern medicine. The global rise of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) organisms is a serious world health problem. With few new antimicrobial drugs on the horizon, it is imperative that we develop novel approaches to extend the service life of our existing drugs. AMR is a complex problem that is being driven by a wide range of factors. More than half of the antibiotics prescribed have no medical benefit, and outpatient visits for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a major contributor to this problem. Recent studies have shown that nearly half of people treated for UTIs receive the wrong frontline drug and in 75% of patients, the duration of therapy is inappropriate. Limitations in the current diagnostic technology make it impossible to identify UTI pathogens and measure their antibiotic sensitivities during the short out-patient clinical visits that are typical for most UTI patients. These circumstances result in the inappropriate use of stronger than necessary or inappropriate antimicrobials. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a system that can detect bacteria in urine and find the best antibiotic in under 4 hours, thus enabling a rapid diagnosis and use of the most appropriate and cost-effective antimicrobial agent for the agent detected.

Detailed description

Testing done in this study will be performed either on bacterial isolates stored in the microbiology laboratory at the Diagnostic and Scientific Center in Calgary, or on up to one milliliter of residual urine sample submitted to the diagnostic laboratory with a request for urine culture and sensitivity. All urine cultures will be performed and reported in accordance with standards laboratory protocols. Research testing will only be done on residual sample once patient samples are processed or reported on for clinical purposes. During the first phase of the study, metabolic biomarkers for uropathogens will be identified using mass spectrometry on sub-cultures of frozen isolates from the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. This will include at least 50 isolates each of uropathogens consisting of but not limited to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus species, and Candida species. Biomarkers that are present in greater than 95% of the isolates will subsequently be using the analysis of 2000 negative, and 2000 positive urine cultures. Compounds that are subsequently identified as high yield will be selected for carbon 13 labeling to service standards. In phase II of the study, following the development of a biomarker enrichment device at the CMRF, a performance urinalysis of the device will be conducted using residual urine sample from 1000 negative and 2000 positive urine specimens as outlined above. The performance of the new device will be evaluated relative to standard cultures and urine liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Following the creation of a sensitive and specific assay, a prospective study will be carried out at the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. 3000 sample submitted for urine culture will be process in parallel with the new device and standard microbiology procedures. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value for each analyte compared to standard culture will be determined in this portion of the study. Cost calculations and performance characteristics including turnaround time of the new assay will be compared to that in the standard laboratory procedure.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Alberta Health services
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have not submitted urine samples will not be included as the samples are required for both standard testing and research. This would include patients who are being treated empirically by physicians.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient's who have not submitted urine samples for culture will not be included in study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assay ID Validation2 yearsIn the validation phase of the study sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for detecting significant bacteriuria using culture as the gold standard, These values will be calculated for the whole cohort as per standard definitions using statistical software (Analyse-it for Excel).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Susceptibility - anti-microbial susceptibility of new assay versus standard laboratory methods2 yearsA secondary outcome variable will be the detection of antimicrobial susceptibility using the new assay will be the calculation of essential and categorical agreement, major, very major and minor errors between the new assay and standard laboratory methods as per standard laboratory definitions.
Turn-around-time to bacterial detection and susceptibility2 yearsAnother secondary outcome will be the turn-around- time (TAT) to bacterial detection and availability of susceptibility results.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactIan A Lewis, PhD
ian.lewis2@ucalgary.ca403-220-4366
Backup ContactTroy D Feener, MSc
tdfeener@ucalgary.ca403-870-1201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026