Skip to content

Indirect Laryngoscopy and Ultrasonography in Prediction of Difficult Airway

The Role of Indirect Laryngoscopy, Clinical and Ultrasonographic Assessment in Prediction of Difficult Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04226703
Enrollment
140
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2019-06-15
Completion date
2019-12-15
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Intubation

Keywords

airway, laryngoscopy, ultrasonography

Brief summary

This study was designed to assess the success of indirect laryngoscopy and ultrasonographic measurements in the prediction of difficult airway. All patients were examined by indirect laryngoscopy and ultrasonography preoperatively and the predictive values for difficult airway of these methods were compared.

Detailed description

Difficult airway is a condition that increases the patient's vital risk and leaves the anesthesia and surgical team in a difficult position. Failure to perform an adequate preoperative evaluation may result in the team being unprepared. Therefore, various methods have been investigated in the prediction of difficult airway from past to present. With the development of technology, imaging methods have become routine applications in clinical use. Ultrasonography and indirect laryngoscopy have been shown to be used in predicting difficult airway in the literature, but there is no study showing which is a better predictor.

Interventions

Ultrasonographic upper airway measurements: Epiglottis-skin distance, Hyoid bone-skin distance, Anterior commissure-skin distance and Thickness of tounge root. Indirect Laryngoscopy: Grading of laryngoscopic view (I=Visible anterior commissure and vocal cords, II= visible posterior part of vocal cords and posterior commissure, III= Visible posterior commissure and epiglottis, IV= Visible only epiglottis tip and posterior pharyngeal wall)

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is operated in ear, nose and throat department. * Subject over the age of 18. * Subject giving consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject under the age of 18 * Subject with a history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region, * Subject with facial deformity, * Subject whose neck movements have been restricted by previous trauma or surgery, * Subject has laryngeal disease * Previously operated subject with known airway assessment * Morbidly obese subject with BMI\> 40

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Indirect Laryngoscopic GradeThe day before surgeryThe otolaryngologist,who is blind about ultrasonographic airway measurements of patients, performs indirect laryngoscopy and evaluates the laryngeal view.
Cormack-Lehane ClassificationThree minutes after induction of anesthesia.The anesthesiologist, who is blind about indirect laryngoscopy findings and ultrasonographic airway measurements, performs intubation and evaluates the laryngeal view.
Epiglottis skin distance in centimeters.Five minutes before induction of anesthesia.The anesthesiologist, who is blind about indirect laryngoscopy findings and is experienced user of ultrasonography, measures epiglottis to skin distance.
Hyoid bone-skin distance in centimeters.Five minutes before induction of anesthesia.The anesthesiologist, who is blind about indirect laryngoscopy findings and is experienced user of ultrasonography, measures hyoid bone to skin distance.
Anterior commissure-skin distance in centimeters.Five minutes before induction of anesthesia.The anesthesiologist, who is blind about indirect laryngoscopy findings and is experienced user of ultrasonography, measures anterior commissure to skin distance.
Thickness of tongue root in centimeters.Five minutes before induction of anesthesia.The anesthesiologist, who is blind about indirect laryngoscopy findings and is experienced user of ultrasonography, measures thickness of tongue root.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thyromental distance in centimetersThe day before surgeryThe distance between thyroid notch and mentum. Evaluated by the anesthesiologist who performs intubation.
Sternomental distance in centimeters.The day before surgeryThe distance between sternal notch and mentum. Evaluated by the anesthesiologist who performs intubation.
Neck circumference in centimeters.The day before surgeryEvaluated by the anesthesiologist who performs intubation.
Mallampati classificationThe day before surgeryEvaluated by the anesthesiologist who performs intubation.
Body mass index (BMI)The day before surgeryWeight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2.Evaluated by the anesthesiologist who performs intubation.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026