Skip to content

Performance and Safety of Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses

Clinical Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Safety of a New Monthly Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04226560
Enrollment
65
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2020-04-20
Completion date
2021-05-30
Last updated
2021-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Keywords

Nearsightedness, Eye wear, Myopia control, Contact lens

Brief summary

To demonstrate substantial equivalence of the new Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses(SHSCL) to the commercially available ACUVUE® VITA™ contact lens

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, subject-masked, bilateral, randomized, parallel group dispensing study comparing the SHSCL test lens against the 1-Month ACUVUE® VITA™ (1-MAV) control lenses. Each subject will be randomized to wear either the test or of the control with similar/comparable lens parameters optimized for vision. Both test and control lens will be used in their daily wear, monthly replacement modality for thirteen (13) weeks. It is anticipated that this study will involve up to 6 scheduled visits.

Interventions

DEVICE41% Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses(SHSCL)

Silicone Hydrogel

DEVICEACUVUE® VITA™ (senofilcon C) Brand (Soft) Contact Lens

Senofilcon C (USFDA Device License #K160212)

OTHERContact Lens Care Product

Cefatrizine (propylene Glycol), Sodium Citrate (sodium Citrate Tribasic), Sodium Chloride, Sodium Borate (sodium Biboratesodium Tetraborate, Polyquaternium -1, Hydrochloric Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, Water Purified ( Eq to Aqueous Purified Or Purified Water ), Tetronic 1304, Myristamidopropyl Dimethylamine, Nonanoyl Ethylenediaminetriacetic Acid

OTHERContact Lens Case

Alcon Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens Case (Non-Sterile)

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
ApexLens Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: 1. Healthy adult males or females age ≥20-45 years of age; 2. Be a currently adapted soft contact lens wearer (i.e. be wearing lenses at least 1 month prior to enrolment) and the last contact lenses worn more than a week ago; 3. Have a contact lens powers between -2.00D and -6.00D (both inclusive) in both eyes; 4. Astigmatism of 1.00D or less in both eyes; 5. Be able to wear the lens powers available for this study; 6. Be correctable to a visual acuity of 0.8 decimal (+0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye; 7. The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol; 8. The subject must read and sign the Informed Consent form.

Exclusion criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: 1. Previously unsuccessful with contact lens wear, worn rigid gas permeable contact lenses within past 12 months; 2. Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit); 3. Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may contraindicate contact lens wear; 4. Any ocular medications use within the last one month; 5. Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear; 6. Any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV), by self-report; 7. Any current or previous orthokeratology treatment, or planned for orthokeratology treatment during the study; 8. Any previous history of ocular and/or refractive surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.), or planned for ocular and/or refractive surgery during the study 9. History of herpetic keratitis; 10. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus, by self-report; 11. Allergic reactions to test lens, control lens or the contact lens solution used in this study; 12. A clinical finding or history of entropion, ectropion, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, pathologically dry eye, history of recurrent corneal erosions, aphakia, or moderate or above corneal distortion, by self-report; 13. Employee of investigational clinic (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician); 14. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment; 15. Any slit lamp findings which would contraindicate contact lens wear; 16. Any history of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event within the past 12 months that may contraindicate contact lens wear; or 17. Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures; 18. Subjects are considered ineligible for the study as judged by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best-corrected contact lens visual acuity13 weeksThe primary efficacy endpoint in this evaluation is the percentage of subjects with best-corrected contact lens visual acuity of 0.8 decimal (+0.10 logMAR) and 1.0 decimal (0.00 logMAR) or better. The Snellen chart will be used for visual acuity testing.
Permanent loss of visual acuity13 weeksThe primary safety endpoint in this evaluation is the percentage of subjects with permanent loss of two or more lines of visual acuity.
Serious adverse reactions13 weeksThe primary safety endpoint in this evaluation is the rate of serious adverse reactions related to visual acuity loss as well as accompanying slit-lamp findings and other associated observations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens comfort13 weeksThe secondary efficacy endpoint is the assessment of lens comfort over time with the lens for the recommended wearing time. This will be measured using Study Diary. Subject will be given a Study Diary to be completed at home, to reflect their lens wear experience at the time of rating. Subject will be given careful explanation of how and when to complete them. Comfort after insertion (i.e. after lens settling), after 4 hours, and just before lens removal (0-10 scale)(10 = cannot be felt, 0 = painful)
Subject reported ocular complaints13 weeksSubjects will be asked to assess ocular complaints by using Study Diary.
Symptoms of dryness13 weeksThe secondary efficacy endpoint is the assessment of dryness symptoms with the lens for the recommended wearing time. This will be measured using Study Diary. Subject will be given a Study Diary to be completed at home, to reflect their lens wear experience at the time of rating. Subject will be given careful explanation of how and when to complete them. Dryness after insertion (i.e. after lens settling), after 4 hours, and just before lens removal (0-10 scale)(10 = cannot be felt, 0 = painful)
Slit lamp findings13 weeksThe secondary efficacy endpoint is the assessment of the rate of any Slit Lamp Findings \> Grade 2. The subject will be instructed to take off the study lenses before the slit-lamp biomicroscopy assessment. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy will be assessed according to the approved study biomicroscopy CRF. ISO 11980:2012 Annex B will be used to grade the Slit-lamp findings.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactRex Tsou
rex.tsou@apexlens.com886-3-5752910

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026