Skip to content

CHOiCE! Choose Health: Oncological Patients Cenetered Exercise

Different Modalities of Exercise for Physical Activity Promotion in Cancer Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04226508
Acronym
CHOiCE
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2023-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mixed Cancer

Brief summary

The CHOICE! study is an exercise program following the recommendation of the American College of Sports Science for cancer patients. The aims of the intervention are to test the safety and feasibility of a structured program, letting patients choose the modality of delivery. Secondary endpoints include exercise health-related skills and quality of life. The program considers the preferences of exercise of cancer survivors, giving the possibility to choose the exercise modality (autonomous, with a personal trainer or group class). This program will be tested in different cancer populations with different study designs based on different patients cohort (i.e., RCT or single-arm).

Interventions

OTHERPhysical exercise

The patients can choose between three modality of EX: 1. Autonomous supervised training : a personalized activity is proposed. People choosing this modality have a written material, in which all the exercise, the activity, the frequency, the duration, the intensity are specifically described and reported, to perform the training at home. A training diary and 7 meetings (face to face, or skype or other modality) are proposed for monitoring the intervention. 2. Personal training program: a personalized activity is proposed. Patients are followed individually in a gym contest by a qualified kinesiologist. 3. Group training program: the training is performed in a small group, supervised and monitored by a qualified kinesiologist. The instructor-user ratio is 1:4 - 1:8, depending on the functional conditions and the heterogeneity of the participants.

Sponsors

Universita di Verona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The CHOiCE includes different substudies, with different study designs, i.e., RCT, single arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a confirmed cancer diagnosis; * ≥ 8 weeks post-surgical procedure; * Medical clearance for participation provided by primary care physician or oncologist; * Informed consent signed;

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years old; * Pregnancy; * Inability to ambulate; * Contraindication to participation in a regular physical activity program; * Inability to understand the instructions for PA and/or Mini Mental State index \<24; * Serious physical limitation and/or Karnofsky index \<50.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of participants with an adverse eventChange from baseline to 12 weeksAdverse events will categorize according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0)
The eligibility rateAt 12 weeksThe number of patients considered eligible dividing the number of subjects who meet inclusion criteria
The recruitment rateAt 12 weeksThe number of patients randomized dividing the number of subjects considered eligible
The adherence to exercise protocolAt 12 weeksMeasured by the total number of exercise sessions attended
The dropouts rateAt 6 monthsDefined as a participant who leaves the study for any reason prior to completing the 12-week (24 session) exercise program. All reasons for drop out will be reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body mass indexChange from baseline antrhopometric values at 3 monthsCalculated from weight and height
Waist-hip ratioChange from baseline antrhopometric values at 3 monthsCalculated usign the waist and hip circumferences
Cardiorespiratory fitnessChange from baseline cardiorespiratory fitness at 3 monthsUsing the Six minutes walking test
Quality of life (QoL)Change from baseline quality of life at 3 monthsUsing European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30), ranging from 0 (lowest QoL) to 100 (highest QoL)
Physical activity levelChange from baseline physical activity level at 3 monthsUsing the Godin's Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ). GLTEQ inquires about frequency of vigorous, moderate and mild intensity EX as defined by Godin. Subsequently, each frequency is multiplied by its correspondent metabolic equivalent of the task (MET), i.e. vigorous\*9; moderate\*5; mild\*3. A Leisure Score Index (LSI) was calculated, using the sum of vigorous and moderate components. Based on LSI patients were then classified as active (if LSI≥ 24) and insufficiently active (if LSI\<24) according to the American College of Sport Medicine Physical Activity Guidelines.
EnjoymentChange from baseline enjoyment at 3 monthsUsing the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES), ranging from 0 (no enjoyment) to 75 (max enjoyment)
Upper limb muscle strengthChange from baseline muscle strength at 3 monthsUsing the Handgrip strength test
Lower limb muscle strengthChange from baseline muscle strength at 3 monthsUsing the Isometric Leg Press strength test
Upper limb flexibilityChange from baseline flexibility at 3 monthsUsing the Back Scratch test
Lower limb flexibilityChange from baseline flexibility at 3 monthsUsing the Sit and Reach test

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026