Skip to content

Breath Stacking Technique Associated With Expiratory Muscle Training in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients

Comparison Between Breath Stacking Technique Associated With Expiratory Muscle Training and Breath Stacking Technique in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients: a Randomized Single Blind Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04226144
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2020-01-06
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2023-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Neuromuscular Diseases

Keywords

respiratory function tests, deglution disorders

Brief summary

it will be conducted a randomized parallel controlled trial with patients diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) to compare two techniques to lung recruitment and cough augmentation, to assess their effects on pulmonary function, global functionally, swallowing and ability to speech in these population.

Detailed description

age over 18 years preserved cognition, evidenced by a score greater than or equal to 24 points in the Mini-Mental Status Exam; no barium allergies; without tracheostomy or invasive mechanical ventilation; no diaphragmatic pacemaker and without associated respiratory disease.Participants are excluded if they have pregnancy; previous kidney disease or other concomitant diseases; respiratory diseases and hospitalization in intensive care units (ICUs) during the study.

Interventions

DEVICEBreath Stacking Group

Lung recruitment technique using manual bag resuscitation with oronasal mask interface

DEVICEBreath stacking and EMT

Lung recruitment technique with one way valve with counter resistance during all expiratory phase

Sponsors

Escola Superior de Ciencias da Saude
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

two-arm, parallel (1:1), superiority, blinded-assessor randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of neuromuscular disease confirmed by neurologists at the referral center for neuromuscular diseases at Brasília prior to screening for recruitment * age over 18 years * preserved cognition, evidenced by a score greater than or equal to 24 points in the Mini-Mental Status Exam; * no barium allergies * without tracheostomy or invasive mechanical ventilation * no diaphragmatic pacemaker * without associated respiratory disease

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * previous kidney disease or other concomitant diseases .respiratory diseases and hospitalization in intensive care units (ICUs) during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximal respiratory pressuresfrom baseline to 24 weekschange of decline rate of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) assessed by digital pressure (MVD-500 V.1.1 Microhard System,Porto Alegre, Brazil).
Peak cough flowfrom baseline to 24 weekschange of decline rate of peak cough flow (PCF) assessed by analogic peak cough flow meter (Respironics-Philips Health Care,PA,USA)
Forced Vital Capacity and Slow Vital Capacityfrom baseline to 24 weeksChange of decline rate of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) predicted by brazilian population assessed by digital spirometer (Vitalgraph, London, UK)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ALSFR-BRfrom baseline to 24 weekschange of decline rate of Amyotrofic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Revised Scale Brazil (ALSFR-BR)
Voice parametersfrom baseline to 24 weekschange of Maximum Phonation Time
swalloing functionfrom baseline to 24 weekschange of The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10)

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026