Skip to content

Dynamically Tailored Behavioral Interventions in Diabetes

Dynamically Tailoring Interventions for Problem-Solving in Diabetes Self-Management Using Self-Monitoring Data - a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04226027
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2020-01-17
Completion date
2025-03-30
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Mobile health, Mhealth, T2.coach, Smartphone app

Brief summary

In this project, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of a novel approach to personalizing behavioral interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to individuals' behavioral and glycemic profiles discovered using computational learning and self-monitoring data. This study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial with n=280 participants recruited from the participating Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group and the usual care (control) group with 1-1 allocation ratio. Half of the participants (n=140) will be randomly assigned to a usual care (control) group. Both groups will receive standard diabetes education at their respective FQHC site. In addition, the experimental group will receive instructions to use T2.coach for a minimum of 6 months.

Detailed description

One of the main difficulties in managing diabetes is that each affected individual requires personally tailored combination of diet, exercise, and medication to effectively control their blood sugar. Rather than strictly following a doctor's prescription, individuals need to carefully examine their lifestyle choices and their impact on their health. Independent learning, experimentation and problem solving become of great importance. However, they can be challenging for individuals with diabetes. In this project, the investigators will refine and evaluate a novel intervention for diabetes self-management that uses computational analysis of self-monitoring data to help individuals with type 2 diabetes identify what daily activities, including consumption of meals, physical activity, and sleep, have impact on blood glucose levels, and suggest modifications to these daily activities to improve blood glucose levels. Growing evidence highlights significant differences in glycemic function and cultural, social, and economical circumstances of individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) that impact their self-management. Precision medicine strives to personalize medical treatment to an individual's genetic makeup, computationally discovered clinical phenotypes and lifestyle. Studies showed the benefits of tailoring not only medical treatment, but also behavioral interventions. Yet, currently, personalization of self-management in T2DM requires each individual to engage in discovery, reflection, and problem-solving-critical but cognitively demanding activities-or to rely on their healthcare providers. Both of these may present considerable barriers to individuals from medically under-served low income communities. Mobile health (mHealth) solutions in T2DM bring promise of reaching wider populations in need of self-management; however, few such solutions provide assistance with personalizing self-management behaviors. Ongoing efforts on personalizing behavioral interventions outside of T2DM focus on tailoring behavior modification techniques to individuals' psycho-social characteristics, such as self-efficacy ), and tailoring delivery of intervention to individuals' context rather than on personalizing self-management strategies. The ongoing focus of this research is on developing informatics interventions for diabetes self-management, with a specific focus on discovery with self-monitoring data and on problem-solving for improving glycemic control. In the proposed research the investigators introduce T2.coach, an mHealth intervention that uses computational analysis of self-monitoring data to identify behavioral patterns associated with poor glycemic control and formulate personalized behavioral goals for changing problematic behaviors. This study will evaluate T2.coach's efficacy in a two-arm RCT with stratified randomization conducted with Clinical Directors Network (CDN), a well-recognized primary care practice-based research network (PBRN) of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-designated Center of Excellence (P30) for Practice-based Research and Learning.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALT2.coach

T2.coach is a smartphone app for low-burden capture of diet and blood glucose (BG) levels and for reviewing past records, integrated with FitBit for captured of physical activity and sleep. All captured data are sent to the computational inference engine that uses machine learning methods and expert system to formulate personalized behavioral goals. Examples of behavioral goals include the following: "For high carbohydrate breakfasts, reduce your carbs to be about 1 carb choice. Examples of 1 carb choice are 1 slice of whole wheat toast, 1 cup of oatmeal, or 1 apple." The T2.coach chatbot companion uses text messages to help individuals set goals that are consistent with evidence based guidelines for diabetes self-management, inferences on data captured with T2.coach, and their own preferences, as well as send individuals goal reminders and prompts for reflection on goal achievement.

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Clinical Directors Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Because of the nature of the intervention (smartphone app), masking is not possible.

Intervention model description

Two-arm RCT with 1:1 randomization at participant level, with stratified randomization to balance by clinical site, sex, and language, evaluate the efficacy of the T2.coach intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient of the health center for ≥ 6 months and a diagnosis of T2DM * HbA1c ≥ 8.0, * Aged 18 to 65 years * Attends diabetes education program at the health center * Owns a basic mobile phone * Proficient in either English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant * Presence of severe cognitive impairment (recorded in patient chart), * Existence of other serious illnesses (e.g. cancer diagnosis with active treatment, advanced stage heart failure, dialysis, multiple sclerosis, advanced retinopathy, recorded in patient chart), * Plans for leaving the FQHC in the next 12 months, * Participation in the previous trial of diabetes self-management technologies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean HbA1c ValueBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsThe main outcome is the mean Hemoglobin A1c at 12 months. In the statistical analysis, we examine difference in mean HbA1c between the study arms at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SCA-I ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsDiabetes Self-Care Inventory (SCA-I) is a 15-item 5-point Likert scale (1-never engage; 5-always engage) for measuring different aspects of diabetes self-care. The final score ranges from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) with a higher score indicating better self-care (better outcome). To account for missing values, the final score was normalized to a 1-100 scale with a higher score indicating better self-care. All analysis was conducted with normalized scores.
DSES ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsDiabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) is a 15-item 10-point Likert scale (1-not at all confident; 10-totally confident) that measures the belief that one can self-manage one's own health, adapted to diabetes. Final scores are averaged, and the total score ranges from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) with a lower score indicating poor self-efficacy (worse outcome).
PAID ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) is a 20-item 5-point Likert scale (0=not a problem; 4=very serious problem) that measures the emotional aspect of living with diabetes. The final score ranges from 0 (lowest) to 80 (highest), with a higher score indicating greater emotional discomfort (worse outcome).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOROlena Mamykina, PhD

Columbia University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred from 2020-2023. Initially, participants were recruited in person at two FQHCs via waiting-room outreach and staff referrals. Recruitment paused in March 2020 due to COVID-19. By August 2020, the study transitioned to fully virtual procedures, expanding to four additional sites. The team used secure EHR access to identify eligible participants and conducted outreach by phone.

Pre-assignment details

7,616 participants were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 4,552 did not meet inclusion criteria, 775 declined to participate, and 1,989 were excluded for other reasons. The remaining 300 met the inclusion criteria, were consented and randomized into study arms. Participants were randomized on an individual level. No units other than participants were randomized.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Annual Income
<10,000 USD
57 Participants
Annual Income
>=10,000 USD
90 Participants
Annual Income
Unreported
1 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)33.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Education
Did not complete high school
39 Participants
Education
High school and above
100 Participants
Employment
Employed
88 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
92 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
117 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Insurance
Medicaid/Medicare/Dual Enrollment/none
21 Participants
Insurance
Other
156 Participants
Language
English only
122 Participants
Language
Other (including bilingual)
37 Participants
Language
Spanish only
50 Participants
Marital status
Married
133 Participants
Marital status
Other
73 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
65 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1483 / 152
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1480 / 152
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1484 / 152

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026