Skip to content

A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group Intervention to Increase HIV Testing and PrEP Use Among Latinx Sexual Minority Men

A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group Intervention to Increase HIV Testing and PrEP Use Among Latinx Sexual Minority Men

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04225832
Enrollment
289
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2020-01-20
Completion date
2024-11-27
Last updated
2025-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV

Keywords

Latino/Hispanic/Latinx, men who have sex with men

Brief summary

This study consists of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multi-session cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) group intervention that aims to improve HIV outcomes by increasing adaptive, effective coping responses to stigma from intersectional identities related to ethnicity, immigration status, sexual minority identity, HIV status, and PrEP use among Latinx sexual minority men (SMM).

Detailed description

This study consists of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multi-session cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) group intervention that aims to improve HIV outcomes by increasing adaptive, effective coping responses to stigma from intersectional identities related to ethnicity, immigration status, sexual minority identity, HIV status, and PrEP use among Latinx sexual minority men (SMM). We will test intervention effects on regular HIV testing and use of prevention strategies. The intervention was developed in partnership with community stakeholders at Bienestar Human Services, Inc., a Latinx-focused organization in Los Angeles County (LAC), CA. The intervention is flexible for use in community-based organizations, such as in ongoing support groups. The Specific Aims are: Aim 1. To conduct a randomized controlled trial of a culturally congruent cognitive behavior therapy group intervention for immigrant Latinx sexual minority men, to test intervention effects on regular HIV testing and PrEP uptake. Aim 2. To examine mechanisms of intervention effects on regular HIV testing and PrEP uptake, including more effective coping (e.g., reduced internalized stigma). Aim 3. To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention.

Interventions

A cognitive behavior therapy group intervention for HIV-negative Latinx sexual minority men aimed at increasing HIV testing and prevention strategies.

Sponsors

Bienestar Human Services, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
RAND
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcomes assessor does not randomize participant until after the baseline assessment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* at least 18 years-old * biologically male at birth * identify as male * identify as Latino * is an immigrant * report having sex with men in the past 12 months * report HIV-negative or unknown serostatus * anticipate being available for the next 12 months to attend study visits * able to interact and communicate in spoken Spanish or English.

Exclusion criteria

* HIV-positive * cisgender women * transgender women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV Test at Least Annuallyfrom baseline to 12-monthsParticipants report being tested for HIV at least once in the 12 months after baseline
Took PrEP in the Past 12 Monthsfrom baseline to 12-monthsParticipants report taking PrEP at any follow-up time-point (within the 12-month follow-up time period)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of Adaptive Copingmeasured at 4-months, 8-months, and 12-months post baselineParticipants completed the Brief COPE, a general measure of coping strategies. Items have the instruction indicate the extent you do what the item says when you are faced with discrimination, and response options 1 = I haven't been doing this at all, 2 = I've been doing this a little bit, 3 = I've been doing this a medium amount and 4 = I've been doing this a lot. This scale (identified by EFA) is the mean of 4 items such as I get emotional support from others. Higher values indicate more use of these coping strategies.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited across Southern California using: in-person in-reach at the partner organization; in-person outreach at relevant events and businesses; passive recruitment via hard copy fliers left at the partner community-based organization and other relevant local organizations; social media recruitment via paid advertisements, video posts, and direct messaging. Participants also were offered $10 per referral, for up to three referrals.

Pre-assignment details

Of 607 screened, 455 met inclusion criteria, of whom 289 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CBT Coping Intervention
The intervention is an 8-session cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) group intervention that aims to improve HIV outcomes by increasing adaptive, effective coping responses to stigma from intersectional identities related to ethnicity, immigration status, sexual minority identity, HIV status, and PrEP among Latinx sexual minority men (SMM). The intervention sessions will address topics such as: understanding and coping with intersectional stigma, multiple identities (e.g., race/ethnicity, sexual orientation), medical mistrust, social support, and structural stigma. Intervention groups will be led by a trained facilitator (with expertise in group therapy with Latinx SMM) and a trained peer co-facilitator matched in identities with participants (Latinx SMM). CBT Coping Intervention: A cognitive behavior therapy group intervention for HIV-negative Latinx sexual minority men aimed at increasing HIV testing and prevention strategies.
145
Control
Participants who are randomized to the control condition will be referred to the standard of care program at Bienestar, which includes an ongoing weekly open wellness-oriented support group available to all clients.
144
Total289

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyNo longer eligible (e.g., seroconversion)63
Overall StudyUnable to recontact or too busy/not recontacted or unknown reason365

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCBT Coping InterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Brief COPE: Social support-seeking2.12 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86
2.28 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
2.20 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
Current PrEP use40 Participants43 Participants83 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
145 Participants144 Participants289 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HIV testing in past 12 months86 Participants81 Participants167 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
145 Participants142 Participants287 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
145 participants144 participants289 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
145 Participants144 Participants289 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1450 / 144
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1450 / 144
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 1453 / 144

Outcome results

Primary

HIV Test at Least Annually

Participants report being tested for HIV at least once in the 12 months after baseline

Time frame: from baseline to 12-months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CBT Coping InterventionHIV Test at Least Annually96 Participants
ControlHIV Test at Least Annually114 Participants
p-value: 0.04995% CI: [1.01, 6.26]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Took PrEP in the Past 12 Months

Participants report taking PrEP at any follow-up time-point (within the 12-month follow-up time period)

Time frame: from baseline to 12-months

Population: Of the N=289 described in Baseline Characteristics, N=50 did not complete any follow up assessments. Outcome measures are assessed for the remaining N=239

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CBT Coping InterventionTook PrEP in the Past 12 Months56 Participants
ControlTook PrEP in the Past 12 Months71 Participants
p-value: 0.8395% CI: [0.62, 1.81]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Level of Adaptive Coping

Participants completed the Brief COPE, a general measure of coping strategies. Items have the instruction indicate the extent you do what the item says when you are faced with discrimination, and response options 1 = I haven't been doing this at all, 2 = I've been doing this a little bit, 3 = I've been doing this a medium amount and 4 = I've been doing this a lot. This scale (identified by EFA) is the mean of 4 items such as I get emotional support from others. Higher values indicate more use of these coping strategies.

Time frame: measured at 4-months, 8-months, and 12-months post baseline

Population: Of the N=289 described in Baseline Characteristics, N=50 did not complete any follow up assessments. An additional N=2 control participants did not respond to any of the 4 items in the scale, leaving N=237 for analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CBT Coping InterventionLevel of Adaptive Coping4-month assessment2.14 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
CBT Coping InterventionLevel of Adaptive Coping8-month assessment2.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
CBT Coping InterventionLevel of Adaptive Coping12-month assessment2.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
ControlLevel of Adaptive Coping4-month assessment2.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
ControlLevel of Adaptive Coping8-month assessment2.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
ControlLevel of Adaptive Coping12-month assessment1.96 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Comparison: Unlike the observed at any FU primary outcomes which have a single value for each participant, for this outcome we employed a repeated measures style structure with one record for each of up to 3 FU observations. A sandwich estimator (SAS Proc Surveyreg) was employed to account for clustering of observations within participant.p-value: 0.14Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026